IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i2p646-d1567898.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Logistics Service Supply Chain Coordination in the Context of Green Innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Yuxiang Sun

    (Business School, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China)

  • Xiaopu Zhang

    (Business School, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China)

  • Xirou Huang

    (Business School, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China)

  • Wenbin Cao

    (Business School, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China)

Abstract

With the global advancement of sustainable development concepts, the logistics industry is confronting significant environmental challenges, making green innovation a critical driver for industrial transformation and upgrading. However, during the green innovation process in logistics service supply chains, the differing roles of logistics service integrators and logistics service providers, combined with high costs and uncertain returns, hinder coordination efficiency. Therefore, it is imperative to enhance the coordination of supply chain contracts. Nevertheless, existing literature provides limited insights into the coordination capacities and impacts of different contracts on green innovation in logistics service supply chains. This study develops a Stackelberg game model where the logistics service integrator acts as the leader and logistics service providers serve as followers, examining the effects of cost-sharing contracts, revenue-sharing contracts, and hybrid cost-sharing and revenue-sharing contracts on supply chain coordination. Numerical simulations are employed to validate the findings. The results indicate that hybrid contracts provide the strongest incentives for green innovation among supply chain participants, whereas cost-sharing contracts offer relatively weaker incentives for integrators’ green design innovation. In addition, revenue-sharing contracts and hybrid contracts were effective in reducing the wholesale price of green logistics services, although all three contract types resulted in higher market prices. Finally, all three contract types achieve Pareto improvements in the supply chain, with hybrid contracts maximizing the total profit of the supply chain. This study not only elucidates the incentive mechanisms and relative advantages of different contracts in supply chain collaboration, but also offers critical theoretical and practical insights for designing contracts to foster green innovation in the logistics sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Yuxiang Sun & Xiaopu Zhang & Xirou Huang & Wenbin Cao, 2025. "Research on Logistics Service Supply Chain Coordination in the Context of Green Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-28, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:646-:d:1567898
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/646/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/646/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mansour Rached & Zied Bahroun & Jean-Pierre Campagne, 2016. "Decentralised decision-making with information sharing vs. centralised decision-making in supply chains," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(24), pages 7274-7295, December.
    2. Yihong Hu & Yongrui Duan & Shengnan Qu & Jiazhen Huo, 2024. "Logistics Service Openness Strategy of Online Platforms with Vertical Differentiation and Endogenous Service Level," Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research (APJOR), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 41(04), pages 1-35, August.
    3. Chan He & Xu Xu, 2024. "Research on Green Development Decision Making of Logistics Enterprises Based on Three-Party Game," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-14, March.
    4. Graça Miranda Silva & Paulo J. Gomes & Joseph Sarkis, 2019. "The role of innovation in the implementation of green supply chain management practices," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(5), pages 819-832, July.
    5. Hao Zhang & Jie He & Xiaomeng Shi & Qiong Hong & Jie Bao & Shuqi Xue, 2020. "Technology Characteristics, Stakeholder Pressure, Social Influence, and Green Innovation: Empirical Evidence from Chinese Express Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, April.
    6. Liu, Zugang (Leo) & Anderson, Trisha D. & Cruz, Jose M., 2012. "Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 218(3), pages 602-613.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fei Bu & Xiang Tian & Lulu Sun & Meng Zhang & Yang Xu & Qinge Guo, 2025. "Research on the Impact of University–Industry Collaboration on Green Innovation of Logistics Enterprises in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-35, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Avinadav, Tal & Levy, Priel, 2023. "The effect of an uncertain commission rate on the decisions of a capital-constrained developer," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 11(C).
    2. Yi Zheng & Huchang Liao & Xue Yang, 2016. "Stochastic Pricing and Order Model with Transportation Mode Selection for Low-Carbon Retailers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Wang, Moran & Guo, Xiaolong & Wang, Shouyang, 2022. "Financial hedging in two-stage sustainable commodity supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(2), pages 803-818.
    4. Yang, Yuxiang & Goodarzi, Shadi & Jabbarzadeh, Armin & Fahimnia, Behnam, 2022. "In-house production and outsourcing under different emissions reduction regulations: An equilibrium decision model for global supply chains," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    5. Zhaofu Hong & Hao Wang & Yeming Gong, 2019. "Green product design considering functional-product reference," Post-Print hal-02312293, HAL.
    6. Prudence Dato, 2018. "Investment in Energy Efficiency, Adoption of Renewable Energy and Household Behavior: Evidence from OECD Countries," The Energy Journal, International Association for Energy Economics, vol. 0(Number 3).
    7. Zhang, Dengjun & Xie, Yifan, 2022. "Customer environmental concerns and profit margin: Evidence from manufacturing firms," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    8. Yumin Fu & Jianyun Wu & Cheng Ma & Xiaoyu Fu, 2023. "Agency, Reselling, or Hybrid: Strategic Channel Selection in a Green Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-21, January.
    9. Wenxue Ran & Teng Xu, 2023. "Low-Carbon Supply Chain Coordination Based on Carbon Tax and Government Subsidy Policy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    10. Guo, Jian-Xin & Zhu, Kaiwei, 2021. "Implications for enterprise to adopt cleaner technology: From the perspective of energy market and commodity market," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    11. Ouardighi, Fouad El & Sim, Jeong Eun & Kim, Bowon, 2016. "Pollution accumulation and abatement policy in a supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 982-996.
    12. Takuro Miyamoto, 2023. "Green product diffusion and innovation in supply chains," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 25(3), pages 331-353, July.
    13. Chang-Soo Kim & John Dinwoodie & Young-Joon Seo, 2018. "Inter-Firm Cooperation and Collaboration in Shipper—Shipping Company Relationships for Enhancing Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Hui Li & Chuanxu Wang & Meng Shang & Wei Ou, 2017. "Pricing, Carbon Emission Reduction, Low-Carbon Promotion and Returning Decision in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Vertical and Horizontal Cooperation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, November.
    15. Chunhai Yu & Yingxiang Zhang & Ling Liu & Thomas W. Archibald, 2024. "Low-carbon supply chain strategy and contract coordination considering manufacturers′ fairness concerns," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 24(4), pages 1-51, December.
    16. Jianhong He & Yaling Lei & Xiao Fu, 2019. "Do Consumer’s Green Preference and the Reference Price Effect Improve Green Innovation? A Theoretical Model Using the Food Supply Chain as a Case," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-15, December.
    17. Hongbo Guo & Mengtong Lu & Lili Ding, 2022. "The Effect of Consumer Sentiment on Manufacturers’ Green Technology Innovation: A RDEU Evolutionary Game Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, December.
    18. Liangjie Xia & Yongwan Bai & Sanjoy Ghose & Juanjuan Qin, 2022. "Differential game analysis of carbon emissions reduction and promotion in a sustainable supply chain considering social preferences," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 310(1), pages 257-292, March.
    19. Yuanqiao Chen & Zhisong Chen & Jianhui Peng, 2021. "How does emission right-based lending contribute to sustainable production and green financing? A modelling study," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 13945-13972, September.
    20. Chen, Jiumei & Zhang, Wen & Gong, Bengang & Zhang, Xiaoqi & Li, Hongping, 2022. "Optimal policy for the recycling of electric vehicle retired power batteries," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:646-:d:1567898. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.