IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9350-d1776374.html

Enhancing Transparency and Trust in Higher Education Institutions via Blockchain: A Conceptual Model Utilizing the Ethereum Consortium Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Yerlan Kistaubayev

    (Faculty of Information Technologies, Al-Farabi Kazakh National University, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan)

  • Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas

    (Marketing and Market Research Department, University of Granada, 18071 Granada, Spain)

  • Aijaz A. Shaikh

    (Department of Information Security, The Institute of Information and Computational Technologies, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan)

  • Galimkair Mutanov

    (Department of Information Security, The Institute of Information and Computational Technologies, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan)

  • Olga Ussatova

    (Department of Information Security, The Institute of Information and Computational Technologies, Almaty 050010, Kazakhstan)

  • Ainura Shinbayeva

    (Department of Standardization, Certification and Metrology, Satbayev University, Almaty 050013, Kazakhstan)

Abstract

It has been recognized that Blockchain technology contributes to environmentally sustainable development goals (SDGs). It has emerged as a disruptive innovation capable of transforming various economic and social sectors significantly. This conceptual paper is driven by the need to explore how blockchain, specifically a consortium-based Ethereum architecture, can be integrated into higher education institutions to ensure data sovereignty, integrity, and verifiability while adhering to legal and ethical standards such as GDPR. We propose a multi-layered blockchain-based model for Kazakhstan’s Unified Platform of Higher Education (UPHE). This model employs hybrid on-chain/off-chain data storage, smart contract automation, and a Proof-of-Authority consensus mechanism to address system limitations, including data centralization and inadequate verification of academic credentials. Empirical simulations using Blockscout and Ethereum-compatible tools demonstrate the model’s feasibility and performance. This paper contributes to the growing discussion on educational blockchain applications by presenting a scalable, secure, and transparent architecture that aligns with institutional governance and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles. It also supports the objectives of UN SDG 4 (i.e., Quality education) by fostering trust, transparency, and equitable access to verifiable educational credentials.

Suggested Citation

  • Yerlan Kistaubayev & Francisco Liébana-Cabanillas & Aijaz A. Shaikh & Galimkair Mutanov & Olga Ussatova & Ainura Shinbayeva, 2025. "Enhancing Transparency and Trust in Higher Education Institutions via Blockchain: A Conceptual Model Utilizing the Ethereum Consortium Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-34, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9350-:d:1776374
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9350/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9350/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jesse Yli-Huumo & Deokyoon Ko & Sujin Choi & Sooyong Park & Kari Smolander, 2016. "Where Is Current Research on Blockchain Technology?—A Systematic Review," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, October.
    2. Adele Parmentola & Antonella Petrillo & Ilaria Tutore & Fabio De Felice, 2022. "Is blockchain able to enhance environmental sustainability? A systematic review and research agenda from the perspective of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(1), pages 194-217, January.
    3. Cristian Lepore & Michela Ceria & Andrea Visconti & Udai Pratap Rao & Kaushal Arvindbhai Shah & Luca Zanolini, 2020. "A Survey on Blockchain Consensus with a Performance Comparison of PoW, PoS and Pure PoS," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-26, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Charfeddine, Lanouar & Umlai, Mohamed, 2023. "ICT sector, digitization and environmental sustainability: A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2022," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    2. Kawther Saeedi, 2024. "Promoting Sustainable Household Engagement in Recycling via Blockchain-Based Loyalty Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-14, October.
    3. Li, Zhaochen & Xu, Zimu, 2025. "Digital technology and innovation:The impact of blockchain application on enterprise innovation," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    4. Matteo Vaccargiu & Andrea Pinna & Roberto Tonelli & Luisanna Cocco, 2023. "Blockchain in the Energy Sector for SDG Achievement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-23, October.
    5. Wang Guizhou & Zhang Si & Yu Tao & Ning Yu, 2021. "A Systematic Overview of Blockchain Research," Journal of Systems Science and Information, De Gruyter, vol. 9(3), pages 205-238, June.
    6. Giuseppe Varavallo & Giuseppe Caragnano & Fabrizio Bertone & Luca Vernetti-Prot & Olivier Terzo, 2022. "Traceability Platform Based on Green Blockchain: An Application Case Study in Dairy Supply Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-14, March.
    7. Büttgen, Marion & al.,, 2021. "Blockchain in Service Management and Service Research - Developing a Research Agenda and Managerial Implications," SMR - Journal of Service Management Research, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 5(2), pages 71-102.
    8. Ximing Chen & Jie Shang & Muhammad Zada & Shagufta Zada & Xueqiang Ji & Heesup Han & Antonio Ariza-Montes & Jesús Ramírez-Sobrino, 2021. "Health Is Wealth: Study on Consumer Preferences and the Willingness to Pay for Ecological Agricultural Product Traceability Technology: Evidence from Jiangxi Province China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-13, November.
    9. Saha, Aditi & Raut, Rakesh D. & Kumar, Mukesh & Paul, Sanjoy Kumar & Shi, Yangyan & Shah, Bhavin & Ghoshal, Sudishna, 2025. "Achieving sustainable carbon-neutral supply chain: A perspective of integrating blockchain technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    10. Teck Ming Tan & Saila Saraniemi, 2023. "Trust in blockchain-enabled exchanges: Future directions in blockchain marketing," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 51(4), pages 914-939, July.
    11. Hadiqa Ahmad & Muhammad Yaqub & Seung Hwan Lee, 2024. "Environmental-, social-, and governance-related factors for business investment and sustainability: a scientometric review of global trends," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 2965-2987, February.
    12. Komulainen, Ruey & Nätti, Satu, 2023. "Barriers to blockchain adoption: Empirical observations from securities services value network," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    13. Dehghani, Milad & William Kennedy, Ryan & Mashatan, Atefeh & Rese, Alexandra & Karavidas, Dionysios, 2022. "High interest, low adoption. A mixed-method investigation into the factors influencing organisational adoption of blockchain technology," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 393-411.
    14. Katarzyna Bułkowska & Magdalena Zielińska & Maciej Bułkowski, 2024. "Blockchain-Based Management of Recyclable Plastic Waste," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-25, June.
    15. Gajendra Liyanaarachchi & Giampaolo Viglia & Fidan Kurtaliqi, 2024. "Addressing challenges of digital transformation with modified blockchain," Post-Print hal-04440365, HAL.
    16. Ernest Barceló & Katarina Dimić-Mišić & Monir Imani & Vesna Spasojević Brkić & Michael Hummel & Patrick Gane, 2023. "Regulatory Paradigm and Challenge for Blockchain Integration of Decentralized Systems: Example—Renewable Energy Grids," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-27, January.
    17. Chalmers, Dominic & Fisch, Christian & Matthews, Russell & Quinn, William & Recker, Jan, 2022. "Beyond the bubble: Will NFTs and digital proof of ownership empower creative industry entrepreneurs?," Journal of Business Venturing Insights, Elsevier, vol. 17(C).
    18. Aditi S. Saha & Rakesh D. Raut & Vinay Surendra Yadav & Abhijit Majumdar, 2022. "Blockchain Changing the Outlook of the Sustainable Food Supply Chain to Achieve Net Zero?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-21, December.
    19. Tandon, Anushree & Kaur, Puneet & Mäntymäki, Matti & Dhir, Amandeep, 2021. "Blockchain applications in management: A bibliometric analysis and literature review," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    20. Fuad A. Ghaleb & Waleed Ali & Bander Ali Saleh Al-Rimy & Sharaf J. Malebary, 2023. "Intelligent Proof-of-Trustworthiness-Based Secure Safety Message Dissemination Scheme for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks Using Blockchain and Deep Learning Techniques," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-24, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9350-:d:1776374. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.