IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9348-d1776359.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Incremental Urbanism and the Circular City: Analyzing Spatial Patterns in Permits, Land Use, and Heritage Regulations

Author

Listed:
  • Shriya Rangarajan

    (Department of City and Regional Planning, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA)

  • Jennifer Minner

    (Department of City and Regional Planning, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA)

  • Yu Wang

    (Department of City and Regional Planning, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA)

  • Felix Korbinian Heisel

    (Department of Architecture, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA)

Abstract

The construction industry is a major contributor to global resource consumption and waste. This sector extracts over two billion tons of raw materials each year and contributes over 30% of all solid waste generated annually through construction and demolition debris. The movement toward circularity in the built environment aims to replace linear processes of extraction and disposal by promoting policies favoring building preservation and adaptive reuse, as well as the salvage and reuse of building materials. Few North American cities have implemented explicit policies that incentivize circularity to decouple urban growth from resource consumption, and there remain substantial hurdles to adoption. Nonetheless, existing regulatory and planning tools, such as zoning codes and historic preservation policies, may already influence redevelopment in ways that could align with circularity. This article examines spatial patterns in these indirect pathways through a case study of a college town in New York State, assessing how commonly used local planning tools shape urban redevelopment trajectories. Using a three-stage spatial analysis protocol, including exploratory analysis, Geographically Weighted Regressions (GWRs), and Geographic Random Forest (GRF) modeling, the study evaluates the impact of zoning regulations and historic preservation designations on patterns of demolition, reinvestment, and incremental change in the building stock. National historic districts were strongly associated with more building adaptation permits indicating reinvestment in existing buildings. Mixed-use zoning was positively correlated with new construction, while special overlay districts and low-density zoning were mostly negatively correlated with concentrations of building adaptation permits. A key contribution of this paper is a replicable protocol for urban building stock analysis and insights into how land use policies can support or hinder incremental urban change in moves toward the circular city. Further, we provide recommendations for data management strategies in small cities that could help strengthen analysis-driven policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Shriya Rangarajan & Jennifer Minner & Yu Wang & Felix Korbinian Heisel, 2025. "Incremental Urbanism and the Circular City: Analyzing Spatial Patterns in Permits, Land Use, and Heritage Regulations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-24, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9348-:d:1776359
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9348/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9348/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Elena Rudan, 2023. "Circular Economy of Cultural Heritage—Possibility to Create a New Tourism Product through Adaptive Reuse," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-12, March.
    2. Hossain, Md. Uzzal & Ng, S. Thomas & Antwi-Afari, Prince & Amor, Ben, 2020. "Circular economy and the construction industry: Existing trends, challenges and prospective framework for sustainable construction," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    3. Jenny Schuetz & Genevieve Giuliano & Eun Jin Shin, 2018. "Does zoning help or hinder transit-oriented (re)development?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(8), pages 1672-1689, June.
    4. Jennifer Minner, 2016. "Revealing Synergies, Tensions, and Silences Between Preservation and Planning," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 82(2), pages 72-87, April.
    5. Dubé, Jean & Desaulniers, Sarah & Bédard, Louis-Philippe & Binette, Antoine & Leblanc, Emmanuelle, 2018. "Urban residential reconversion through demolition: A land use model based on administrative spatial micro-data," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 686-696.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mateusz Wielopolski & Willem Bulthuis, 2023. "The Better Building Initiative — a Collaborative Ecosystem Involving All Stakeholders as Catalyst to Accelerate the Adoption of Circular Economy Innovations in the Construction Sector," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 3(2), pages 719-733, June.
    2. Jun Geng & Yi Huang & Xiang Li & Yun Zhang, 2023. "Overcoming Barriers to the Adoption of Recycled Construction Materials: A Comprehensive PEST Analysis and Tailored Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    3. Sultan Çetin & Catherine De Wolf & Nancy Bocken, 2021. "Circular Digital Built Environment: An Emerging Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-34, June.
    4. Le Thanh Ha, 2025. "Does Circularity Transformation Hinder Climate Risk? A New Insight from European Countries," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(4), pages 2873-2899, August.
    5. Magnus Sparrevik & Luitzen Boer & Ottar Michelsen & Christofer Skaar & Haley Knudson & Annik Magerholm Fet, 2021. "Circular economy in the construction sector: advancing environmental performance through systemic and holistic thinking," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 392-400, September.
    6. Andrea R. Roberts, 2020. "Preservation without Representation: Making CLG Programs Vehicles for Inclusive Leadership, Historic Preservation, and Engagement," Societies, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, August.
    7. Zahra Hosseini & Bertrand Laratte & Pierre Blanchet, 2023. "Implementing circular economy in the construction sector: Evaluating CE strategies by developing a framework," Post-Print hal-04124246, HAL.
    8. Nkechi McNeil-Ayuk & Ahmad Jrade, 2025. "Integrating Building Information Modeling and Life Cycle Assessment to Enhance the Decisions Related to Selecting Construction Methods at the Conceptual Design Stage of Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-28, March.
    9. Ellen Sterk, 2023. "Willingness to pay for recycled aggregates in concrete among German construction clients," MAGKS Papers on Economics 202311, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    10. Anna Adamik & Michał Nowicki & Andrius Puksas, 2022. "Energy Oriented Concepts and Other SMART WORLD Trends as Game Changers of Co-Production—Reality or Future?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-38, June.
    11. Igor Ceratti Treptow & Jordana Marques Kneipp & Clandia Maffini Gomes & Isak Kruglianskas & Rodrigo Reis Favarin & Carlos María Fernandez-Jardón, 2022. "Business Model Innovation for Sustainable Value Creation in Construction Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-17, August.
    12. Jiawei Wu & Xunrong Ye & Huachun Cui, 2025. "Recycled Materials in Construction: Trends, Status, and Future of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-38, March.
    13. Ewa Mazur-Wierzbicka, 2021. "Towards Circular Economy—A Comparative Analysis of the Countries of the European Union," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-25, May.
    14. Roope Husgafvel & Daishi Sakaguchi, 2021. "Circular Economy Development in the Construction Sector in Japan," World, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-26, December.
    15. Daniel Ferrández & Manuel Álvarez & Pablo Saiz & Alicia Zaragoza, 2022. "Experimental Study with Plaster Mortars Made with Recycled Aggregate and Thermal Insulation Residues for Application in Building," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-17, February.
    16. Roberto Cerchione & Francesco Colangelo & Ilenia Farina & Patrizia Ghisellini & Renato Passaro & Sergio Ulgiati, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Concrete Production within a Circular Economy Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    17. Lavinia Denisia Cuc & Dana Rad & Daniel Manațe & Silviu Gabriel Szentesi & Anca Dicu & Mioara Florina Pantea & Vanina Adoriana Trifan & Cosmin Silviu Raul Joldeș & Graziella Corina Bâtcă-Dumitru, 2023. "Representations of the Smart Green Concept and the Intention to Implement IoT in Romanian Real Estate Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-15, May.
    18. Jurgita Raudeliuniene & Eva Trinkuniene & Aurelija Burinskiene & Raimonda Bubliene, 2025. "Application of Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach COPRAS for Developing Sustainable Building Practices in the European Region," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-26, April.
    19. Inês Bourgeois & Alexandra Queirós & Joaquim Oliveira & Hugo Rodrigues & Romeu Vicente & Victor M. Ferreira, 2022. "Development of an Eco-Design Tool for a Circular Approach to Building Renovation Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.
    20. Wei Tong Chen & Adiqa Kausar Kiani & Ming-Tsung Wu & Hew Cameron Merrett & Chih-Hsing Wang, 2023. "Comparison of the Technical Efficiency of Construction Industries—A Case Study of Taiwan and Mainland China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9348-:d:1776359. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.