IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9320-d1775742.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moderating Role of Sustainability Reporting on the Relationship Between Social Performance and Firm Value in BRICS Countries

Author

Listed:
  • May Abdulaziz Alamoudi

    (Department of Accounting, Faculty of Economics and Administration, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21589, Saudi Arabia)

Abstract

This study investigates the interconnections among sustainability reporting, social performance, and firm value across the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa). Employing a quantitative research design, the study utilizes firm-level data from the Refinitiv database, covering 862 firms operating in the BRICS countries from 2017 to 2022. The analysis begins with Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) regression and extends to models incorporating year-fixed effects and firm-fixed effects to account for heterogeneity and omitted variable bias. Robustness checks are conducted using OLS regression with robust standard errors, fixed effects regression with Driscoll–Kraay standard errors, and an instrumental variable approach to address potential endogeneity concerns. To examine the moderating role of sustainability reporting, interaction terms are incorporated into the regression models and margin plots are used for visualization. The findings reveal that social performance positively impacts firm value, underscoring the role of social responsibility in driving financial performance. Furthermore, sustainability reporting strengthens this relationship, indicating that firms with well-established reporting frameworks can effectively leverage social initiatives to enhance market valuation. Therefore, this study contributes to the literature by providing empirical evidence on the moderating effect of sustainability reporting in emerging markets. The findings offer valuable implications for policymakers, investors, and corporate leaders seeking to optimize CSR strategies and enhance firm value in dynamic economic environments.

Suggested Citation

  • May Abdulaziz Alamoudi, 2025. "Moderating Role of Sustainability Reporting on the Relationship Between Social Performance and Firm Value in BRICS Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-19, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9320-:d:1775742
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9320/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9320/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bouslah, Kais & Kryzanowski, Lawrence & M’Zali, Bouchra, 2013. "The impact of the dimensions of social performance on firm risk," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1258-1273.
    2. Stuart L. Hart & Gautam Ahuja, 1996. "Does It Pay To Be Green? An Empirical Examination Of The Relationship Between Emission Reduction And Firm Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 5(1), pages 30-37, March.
    3. Prakash J. Singh & Kannan Sethuraman & Jocelin Y. Lam, 2017. "Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Dimensions on Firm Value: Some Evidence from Hong Kong and China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-24, August.
    4. ., 2017. "Corporate social responsibility," Chapters, in: Organizational Opportunity and Deviant Behavior, chapter 8, pages 135-158, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. Yan-Leung Cheung & Kun Jiang & Billy Mak & Weiqiang Tan, 2013. "Corporate Social Performance, Firm Valuation, and Industrial Difference: Evidence from Hong Kong," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(4), pages 625-631, June.
    6. Robert G. Eccles & Ioannis Ioannou & George Serafeim, 2014. "The Impact of Corporate Sustainability on Organizational Processes and Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(11), pages 2835-2857, November.
    7. Irene Wei Kiong Ting & Noor Azlinna Azizan & Rajesh Kumar Bhaskaran & Sujit K Sukumaran, 2019. "Corporate Social Performance and Firm Performance: Comparative Study among Developed and Emerging Market Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Mashiyat Tasnia & Syed Musa Bin Syed Jafaar Alhabshi & Romzie Rosman & Mohammad Rokibul Kabir, 2025. "Corporate social responsibility and the financial performance of global banks: the moderating role of corporate tax," Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(3), pages 644-665, July.
    9. Glen Dowell & Stuart Hart & Bernard Yeung, 2000. "Do Corporate Global Environmental Standards Create or Destroy Market Value?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(8), pages 1059-1074, August.
    10. Amy J. Hillman & Gerald D. Keim, 2001. "Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what's the bottom line?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 22(2), pages 125-139, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Massimo Mariani & Fabio Pizzutilo & Alessandra Caragnano & Marianna Zito, 2021. "Does it pay to be environmentally responsible? Investigating the effect on the weighted average cost of capital: Environmental commitment and the cost of capital," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(6), pages 1854-1869, November.
    2. Wójcik Piotr, 2018. "The business case for corporate social responsibility: A literature overview and integrative framework," Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, Sciendo, vol. 26(1), pages 121-148, March.
    3. Yan-Leung Cheung & Kun Jiang & Billy Mak & Weiqiang Tan, 2013. "Corporate Social Performance, Firm Valuation, and Industrial Difference: Evidence from Hong Kong," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(4), pages 625-631, June.
    4. Giovanni Catello Landi & Francesca Iandolo & Antonio Renzi & Andrea Rey, 2022. "Embedding sustainability in risk management: The impact of environmental, social, and governance ratings on corporate financial risk," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(4), pages 1096-1107, July.
    5. Scott J. Callan & Janet M. Thomas, 2009. "Corporate financial performance and corporate social performance: an update and reinvestigation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 61-78, March.
    6. Xiaoyang Li & Yue Maggie Zhou, 2016. "Offshoring Pollution While Offshoring Production," Working Papers 16-09r, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    7. Ioanna Boulouta & Christos Pitelis, 2014. "Who Needs CSR? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on National Competitiveness," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 119(3), pages 349-364, February.
    8. Jongjin Sohn & Jongseon Lee & Nami Kim, 2020. "Going Green Inside and Out: Corporate Environmental Responsibility and Financial Performance under Regulatory Stringency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-23, May.
    9. Wayne Fu & Che‐Ping (Jack) Su, 2021. "The implications of efficiency differences in sustainable development: An empirical study in the consumer product industry," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(5), pages 2489-2504, July.
    10. Lei Wang & Steven Li & Simon Gao, 2014. "Do Greenhouse Gas Emissions Affect Financial Performance? – an Empirical Examination of Australian Public Firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 23(8), pages 505-519, December.
    11. Xiaoyang Li & Yue Maggie Zhou, 2016. "Offshoring Pollution While Offshoring Production," Working Papers 16-09, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    12. Scott J. Callan & Janet M. Thomas, 2014. "Relating CEO Compensation to Social Performance and Financial Performance: Does the Measure of Compensation Matter?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 21(4), pages 202-227, July.
    13. Jenna J. Burke & Rani Hoitash & Udi Hoitash, 2019. "The Heterogeneity of Board-Level Sustainability Committees and Corporate Social Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(4), pages 1161-1186, February.
    14. Justin Hung Nguyen, 2018. "Carbon risk and firm performance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 43(1), pages 65-90, February.
    15. Dev R. Mishra, 2017. "Post-innovation CSR Performance and Firm Value," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 140(2), pages 285-306, January.
    16. Scott J. Callan & Janet M. Thomas, 2011. "Executive compensation, corporate social responsibility, and corporate financial performance: a multi‐equation framework," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(6), pages 332-351, November.
    17. Nahyun Kim & Jon J. Moon & Haitao Yin, 2016. "Environmental Pressure and the Performance of Foreign Firms in an Emerging Economy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 137(3), pages 475-490, September.
    18. José Allouche & Patrice Laroche, 2005. "A Meta-analytical investigation of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance," Post-Print hal-00923906, HAL.
    19. Markus Hang & Jerome Geyer‐Klingeberg & Andreas W. Rathgeber, 2019. "It is merely a matter of time: A meta‐analysis of the causality between environmental performance and financial performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(2), pages 257-273, February.
    20. Gustavo Lannelongue & Javier Gonzalez‐Benito & Oscar Gonzalez‐Benito, 2015. "Input, Output, and Environmental Management Productivity: Effects on Firm Performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(3), pages 145-158, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9320-:d:1775742. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.