IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9284-d1774867.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hidden Greens, Hidden Inequities? Evaluating Accessibility and Spatial Equity of Non-Park Green Spaces in London

Author

Listed:
  • Tianwen Wang

    (College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150006, China)

  • Xiaofei Du

    (College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin 150001, China)

  • Guanqing Feng

    (College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150006, China)

  • Haihui Hu

    (College of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture, Northeast Agricultural University, Harbin 150006, China)

Abstract

Urban green spaces (UGSs) are critical to ecological sustainability and human well-being, but equitable access remains a key challenge, particularly in high-density cities. While existing studies have predominantly focused on parks, the role of non-park green spaces (NPGSs) has received limited attention. This study examines the spatial equity of NPGSs—an overlooked but essential component of urban green infrastructure in Inner London—using a typological classification informed by previous research, along with multi-threshold accessibility assessment and spatial justice evaluation. We apply GIS-based buffer analysis, decomposed Gini coefficients, and Moran’s I clustering to quantify distributional disparities. The main findings are as follows: (1) five NPGS types are defined and mapped in Inner London: Natural and Protected, Community and Household, Purpose-Specific, Linear, and Underutilized; (2) significant accessibility inequities exist among NPGS types, with Community and Household demonstrating high equity (Gini coefficient < 0.25), while Underutilized exhibit severe deprivation (Gini coefficient > 0.74); (3) spatial clustering analysis reveals a core–periphery differentiation, characterized by persistent low–low clusters in central boroughs and emerging high–high hot spots in southeastern/northwestern boroughs. This study underscores the critical role of NPGS in complementing park-based greening strategies and provides a transferable framework to assess green equity, thereby contributing to the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Suggested Citation

  • Tianwen Wang & Xiaofei Du & Guanqing Feng & Haihui Hu, 2025. "Hidden Greens, Hidden Inequities? Evaluating Accessibility and Spatial Equity of Non-Park Green Spaces in London," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-22, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9284-:d:1774867
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9284/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9284/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Evans, D.L. & Falagán, N. & Hardman, C.A. & Kourmpetli, S. & Liu, L. & Mead, B.R. & Davies, J.A.C., 2022. "Ecosystem service delivery by urban agriculture and green infrastructure – a systematic review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    2. Amy Phillips & Dimitra Plastara & Ahmed Z. Khan & Frank Canters, 2023. "Integrating public perceptions of proximity and quality in the modelling of urban green space access," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/371425, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    3. Biernacka, Magdalena & Kronenberg, Jakub & Łaszkiewicz, Edyta & Czembrowski, Piotr & Amini Parsa, Vahid & Sikorska, Daria, 2023. "Beyond urban parks: Mapping informal green spaces in an urban–peri-urban gradient," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    4. Paul Milbourne, 2021. "Growing public spaces in the city: Community gardening and the making of new urban environments of publicness," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(14), pages 2901-2919, November.
    5. Alessandro Rigolon & Debolina Banerjee & Paul Gobster & Sara Hadavi & William Stewart, 2021. "Transferring Vacant Lots to Private Ownership Improves Care and Empowers Residents," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 87(4), pages 570-584, October.
    6. Evan Elderbrock & Kory Russel & Yekang Ko & Elizabeth Budd & Lilah Gonen & Chris Enright, 2024. "Evaluating Urban Green Space Inequity to Promote Distributional Justice in Portland, Oregon," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-25, May.
    7. Stanford, Hugh R. & Hurley, Joe & Garrard, Georgia E. & Kirk, Holly, 2024. "Finding the forgotten spaces: Using a social-ecological framework to map informal green space in Melbourne, Australia," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    8. Matthew Stern & T. William Lester, 2021. "Does Local Ownership of Vacant Land Reduce Crime?," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 87(1), pages 73-84, January.
    9. Wen Wu & Kewei Ding, 2022. "Optimization Strategy for Parks and Green Spaces in Shenyang City: Improving the Supply Quality and Accessibility," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-13, April.
    10. Jinwon Kim & KangJae Jerry Lee & Brijesh Thapa, 2022. "Visualizing fairness: distributional equity of urban green spaces for marginalized groups," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 65(5), pages 833-851, April.
    11. Sikorski, Piotr & Gawryszewska, Beata & Sikorska, Daria & Chormański, Jarosław & Schwerk, Axel & Jojczyk, Agata & Ciężkowski, Wojciech & Archiciński, Piotr & Łepkowski, Maciej & Dymitryszyn, Izabela &, 2021. "The value of doing nothing – How informal green spaces can provide comparable ecosystem services to cultivated urban parks," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    12. Alessandro Rigolon & Jeremy Németh, 2020. "Green gentrification or ‘just green enough’: Do park location, size and function affect whether a place gentrifies or not?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(2), pages 402-420, February.
    13. Peipei Guo & Fang Yu & Yuan Ren & Dong Liu & Jia Li & Zhiyun Ouyang & Xiaoke Wang, 2018. "Response of Ruderal Species Diversity to an Urban Environment: Implications for Conservation and Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-15, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Yixuan, 2024. "Urban Redevelopment and Gentrification: Evidence from the Atlanta BeltLine," 2024 Annual Meeting, July 28-30, New Orleans, LA 343550, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. J. Amy Belaire & Heather Bass & Heather Venhaus & Keri Barfield & Tim Pannkuk & Katherine Lieberknecht & Shalene Jha, 2023. "High-Performance Landscapes: Re-Thinking Design and Management Choices to Enhance Ecological Benefits in Urban Environments," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-18, August.
    3. Tanmoy Malaker & Qingmin Meng, 2024. "Urban Disparity Analytics Using GIS: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-26, July.
    4. Na’Taki Osborne Jelks & Viniece Jennings & Alessandro Rigolon, 2021. "Green Gentrification and Health: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-23, January.
    5. Parisa Almasi & Francesco Pagliacci & Francesco Bettella & Lucia Bortolini & Vincenzo D’Agostino, 2025. "Benefits, co-benefits, and trade-offs in natural water retention measures: a review of classifications and indicators," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(14), pages 16205-16246, August.
    6. Yasser Jezzini & Ghiwa Assaf & Rayan H. Assaad, 2023. "Models and Methods for Quantifying the Environmental, Economic, and Social Benefits and Challenges of Green Infrastructure: A Critical Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-40, May.
    7. Łowicki, Damian & Fornal-Pieniak, Beata & Schwerk, Axel, 2025. "Urban greenery services for noise attenuation, pollutant filtration, and temperature lowering: Supply potential, demand, and budgets in Poznań, Poland," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 73(C).
    8. Yu Zou & Liwei Zhang & Wen Huang & Jiao Chen, 2025. "The Potential of Informal Green Space (IGS) in Enhancing Urban Green Space Accessibility and Optimization Strategies: A Case Study of Chengdu," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, June.
    9. Riepl, Tobias & Schaffartzik, Anke & Grabow, Simon & Banabak, Selim, 2025. "Living well with the foundational economy: Assessing the spatial accessibility of foundational infrastructures in Vienna and the relationship to socio-economic status," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    10. Khosravi, Faramarz & Izbirak, Gokhan, 2024. "A framework of index system for gauging the sustainability of iranian provinces by fusing analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and rough set theory (RST)," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    11. Stępniewska, Małgorzata & Grunewald, Karsten & Villoslada, Miguel & Mizgajski, Andrzej, 2022. "The various faces of transdisciplinarity in research on ecosystem services: Editorial to Special Issue," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    12. Jiayi Liu & Yanbin Li & Yanhan Xu & Castiel Chen Zhuang & Yang Hu & Yue Yu, 2024. "Impacts of Built Environment on Urban Vitality in Cultural Districts: A Case Study of Haikou and Suzhou," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-26, June.
    13. Siqi Feng & Yuefei Zhuo & Zhongguo Xu & Yang Chen & Guan Li & Xueqi Wang, 2024. "Nature’s Neighborhood: The Housing Premium of Urban Parks in Dense Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.
    14. Bo Wang & Shoukui He & Weiwen Ma, 2022. "Does Park Size Affect Green Gentrification? Insights from Chongqing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-14, August.
    15. Melissa VanSickle & Christopher Coutts, 2022. "Considerations for Children’s Nature Connection and Park Environmental Justice in Western Societies," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-12, August.
    16. Mingjie Song & Shicheng Li & Basanta Paudel & Fangjie Pan, 2025. "A Framework for Multifunctional Green Infrastructure Planning Based on Ecosystem Service Synergy/Trade-Off Analysis: Application in the Qinling–Daba Mountain Area," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-22, June.
    17. Suchocka, Marzena & Heciak, Jakub & Błaszczyk, Magdalena & Adamczyk, Joanna & Gaworski, Marek & Gawłowska, Agnieszka & Mojski, Jacek & Kalaji, Hazem M. & Kais, Karolina & Kosno-Jończy, Joanna & Heciak, 2023. "Comparison of Ecosystem Services and Replacement Value calculations performed for urban trees," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    18. Meriläinen, Marjut & Karhula, Aleksi & Kurvinen, Antti & Falkenbach, Heidi & Ala-Mantila, Sanna, 2024. "Transit-induced socioeconomic ascent and new metro stations in Helsinki Metropolitan Area: Distinct effects on renters, homeowners, and pre-existing housing dwellers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    19. Krzysztof Mitelsztedt & Mariusz Ciesielski & Tomasz Hycza & Marek Lisańczuk & Kacper Guderski & Sylwia Kurpiewska & Krzysztof Korzeniewski, 2025. "Exploring the Possibilities of Implementing the ALS-Based 3-30-300 Concept for Urban Green Space Management in Small Municipalities," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-19, February.
    20. Katherine Stewart & Maria Ignatieva, 2025. "Recognising the Fourth Nature: A Case Study of Spontaneous Urban Vegetation in Southwest Australian Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-20, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9284-:d:1774867. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.