IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i20p9257-d1774380.html

Assessing the State of Sustainability in the Fortune 100: Corporate Trends in Strategy, Transparency, and Seriousness

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Bown

    (Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA)

  • Clifton B. Farnsworth

    (Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA)

  • Andrew J. South

    (Department of Civil and Construction Engineering, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA)

  • Heidi L. Lindsey

    (Educational Inquiry, Measurement, and Evaluation, McKay School of Education, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA)

Abstract

This research assessed the transparency and quality of corporate sustainability efforts among US Fortune 100 companies using seven indicators: alignment with UN Sustainable Development Goals, use of sustainability reporting standards and programs, inclusion of long-term goals and milestones, presence of senior sustainability leadership, and the quality of sustainability websites and reports. This research used a cross-sectoral analysis of publicly available corporate disclosures, including company websites and annual reports, to evaluate how well sustainability claims reflect meaningful integration within corporate strategy. Results show that while two-thirds of companies demonstrated strong sustainability efforts across most indicators, a significant minority lacked transparency or depth. Companies with higher Fortune 100 rankings tended to perform better, suggesting that size and visibility may influence sustainability outcomes. However, only half were meaningfully engaged with the Sustainable Development Goals, and many used multiple reporting standards without clear alignment. Despite low participation in the UN Global Compact, many companies still performed well. Most sectors had strong performers, but the Financials sector consistently lagged across all indicators. This study provides a detailed, independent benchmark of corporate sustainability practices and highlights how leading US companies are integrating and communicating sustainability in an era of growing stakeholder expectations.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Bown & Clifton B. Farnsworth & Andrew J. South & Heidi L. Lindsey, 2025. "Assessing the State of Sustainability in the Fortune 100: Corporate Trends in Strategy, Transparency, and Seriousness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-29, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9257-:d:1774380
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9257/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/20/9257/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Theresa Gehringer, 2020. "Corporate Foundations as Partnership Brokers in Supporting the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-24, September.
    2. Carolin Baier & Max Göttsche & Andreas Hellmann & Frank Schiemann, 2022. "Too Good To Be True: Influencing Credibility Perceptions with Signaling Reference Explicitness and Assurance Depth," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 178(3), pages 695-714, July.
    3. Imperiale, Francesca & Pizzi, Simone & Lippolis, Stella, 2023. "Sustainability reporting and ESG performance in the utilities sector," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    4. Elda Du Toit, 2024. "Thirty Years of Sustainability Reporting: Insights, Gaps and an Agenda for Future Research Through a Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-33, December.
    5. Lucia Rocchi & Elena Ricciolini & Gianluca Massei & Luisa Paolotti & Antonio Boggia, 2022. "Towards the 2030 Agenda: Measuring the Progress of the European Union Countries through the SDGs Achievement Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-23, March.
    6. Dayana Jimenez & Isabel B. Franco & Tahlia Smith, 2021. "A Review of Corporate Purpose: An Approach to Actioning the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-21, April.
    7. S. Sethi & Donald Schepers, 2014. "United Nations Global Compact: The Promise–Performance Gap," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(2), pages 193-208, June.
    8. van Oorschot, Kim E. & Aas Johansen, Vilde & Lynes Thorup, Nanna & Aspen, Dina Margrethe, 2024. "Standardization cycles in sustainability reporting within the Global Reporting Initiative," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 492-502.
    9. Geoffrey Williams & John Zinkin, 2010. "Islam and CSR: A Study of the Compatibility Between the Tenets of Islam and the UN Global Compact," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(4), pages 519-533, February.
    10. Andreas Rasche & Sandra Waddock, 2014. "Global Sustainability Governance and the UN Global Compact: A Rejoinder to Critics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(2), pages 209-216, June.
    11. Sajjad Ali & Talib Hussain & Guoliang Zhang & Mohammad Nurunnabi & Benqian Li, 2018. "The Implementation of Sustainable Development Goals in “BRICS” Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-14, July.
    12. Elena Rivo-López & Mónica Villanueva-Villar & Carmen Pardo-López & Mónica Cortés-García, 2025. "Environmental sustainability reporting: a systematic and bibliometric review of two decades of research," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    13. Temmink, Colette & Flynn, David, 2021. "An environmental, social and governance programme for corporate real estate and facilities departments," Corporate Real Estate Journal, Henry Stewart Publications, vol. 10(3), pages 295-303, March.
    14. Armando Calabrese & Roberta Costa & Nathan Levialdi & Tamara Menichini & Roberth Andres Villazon Montalvan, 2020. "Does More Mean Better? Exploring the Relationship between Report Completeness and Environmental Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Maria Federica Izzo & Mirella Ciaburri & Riccardo Tiscini, 2020. "The Challenge of Sustainable Development Goal Reporting: The First Evidence from Italian Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. María Garrido-Ruso & Beatriz Aibar-Guzmán & Albertina Paula Monteiro, 2022. "Businesses’ Role in the Fulfillment of the 2030 Agenda: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-35, July.
    2. Damian Bäumlisberger, 2019. "The United Nations Global Compact as a Facilitator of the Lockean Social Contract," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(1), pages 187-200, September.
    3. Kenneth E. Goodpaster & T. Dean Maines & Michael Naughton & Brian Shapiro, 2018. "Using UNPRME to Teach, Research, and Enact Business Ethics: Insights from the Catholic Identity Matrix for Business Schools," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(4), pages 761-777, February.
    4. Isabel‐María García‐Sánchez & Víctor Amor‐Esteban & Cristina Aibar‐Guzmán & Beatriz Aibar‐Guzmán, 2023. "Translating the 2030 Agenda into reality through stakeholder engagement," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 941-958, April.
    5. Onyeka K. Osuji & Ugochukwu L. Obibuaku, 2016. "Rights and Corporate Social Responsibility: Competing or Complementary Approaches to Poverty Reduction and Socioeconomic Rights?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 136(2), pages 329-347, June.
    6. Eva Nilsson & Martin Fougère, 2025. "Global South States’ Views on Building Partnerships with Corporations: An Agonistic Struggle in the UN and Beyond," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 197(3), pages 445-463, March.
    7. Andreas G. F. Hoepner & Arleta A. A. Majoch & Xiao Y. Zhou, 2021. "Does an Asset Owner’s Institutional Setting Influence Its Decision to Sign the Principles for Responsible Investment?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 168(2), pages 389-414, January.
    8. Roger Leonard Burritt & Katherine Leanne Christ & Hussain Gulzar Rammal & Stefan Schaltegger, 2020. "Multinational Enterprise Strategies for Addressing Sustainability: the Need for Consolidation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 389-410, June.
    9. Jill A. Brown & Cynthia Clark & Anthony F. Buono, 2018. "The United Nations Global Compact: Engaging Implicit and Explicit CSR for Global Governance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 147(4), pages 721-734, February.
    10. Francesco Pacchera & Mariagrazia Provenzano & Cecilia Silvestri & Fabrizio Rossi & Alessandro Ruggieri, 2026. "Challenges and Enablers in Embedding SDGs Within Sustainability Reports," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 2210-2231, March.
    11. Elena Nechita & Cristina Lidia Manea & Elena-Mirela Nichita & Alina-Mihaela Irimescu & Diana Manea, 2020. "Is Financial Information Influencing the Reporting on SDGs? Empirical Evidence from Central and Eastern European Chemical Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-34, November.
    12. Stephanie Schrage & Dirk Ulrich Gilbert, 2021. "Addressing Governance Gaps in Global Value Chains: Introducing a Systematic Typology," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 170(4), pages 657-672, May.
    13. Christian Voegtlin & Nicola Pless, 2014. "Global Governance: CSR and the Role of the UN Global Compact," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 122(2), pages 179-191, June.
    14. María Garrido‐Ruso & Beatriz Aibar‐Guzmán & Óscar Suárez‐Fernández, 2023. "What kind of leaders can promote the disclosure of information on the sustainable development goals?," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 2694-2710, August.
    15. Victor Tomaz de Oliveira & Denilson Teixeira & Antonio Boggia & Lucia Rocchi, 2025. "Performance Towards Sustainability: A Regional Assessment Supported by the Geographic Information Systems," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(6), pages 8855-8869, December.
    16. Shahriyar Mukhtarov & Hasan Dinçer & Halim Baş & Serhat Yüksel, 2022. "Policy Recommendations for Handling Brain Drains to Provide Sustainability in Emerging Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-24, December.
    17. Datu Buyung Agusdinata & Wenjuan Liu & Sinta Sulistyo & Philippe LeBillon & Je'anne Wegner, 2023. "Evaluating sustainability impacts of critical mineral extractions: Integration of life cycle sustainability assessment and SDGs frameworks," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 746-759, June.
    18. Aleksandra Andjelković & Vesna Janković Milić & Marija Radosavljević & Saša Petković & Ditjona Kule & Stojan Debarliev, 2025. "Sustainable Entrepreneurship in the Western Balkan Countries: Key Constraints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-18, October.
    19. Marcelo Royo-Vela & Jonathan Cuevas Lizama, 2022. "Creating Shared Value: Exploration in an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-23, July.
    20. Khemani, Purnima & Kumar, Dilip, 2025. "Do opposites attract? Understanding the influence of infographics and message credibility on investor perceptions and decision-making," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:20:p:9257-:d:1774380. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.