IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i1p270-d1558835.html

Understanding Farmers’ Readiness to Develop a Succession Plan: Barriers, Motivators, and Preliminary Recommendations

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca Purc-Stephenson

    (Augustana Faculty, University of Alberta, Camrose, AB T4V 1R3, Canada)

  • Casey Hartman

    (Augustana Faculty, University of Alberta, Camrose, AB T4V 1R3, Canada)

  • Ella Kim Marriott

    (Faculty of Agricultural, Life & Environmental Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1C9, Canada)

  • Stefanie Phillips

    (Augustana Faculty, University of Alberta, Camrose, AB T4V 1R3, Canada)

  • Cale Scotton

    (Augustana Faculty, University of Alberta, Camrose, AB T4V 1R3, Canada)

Abstract

Although succession planning benefits workforce development, rural economic stability, and the sustainability of a farm, few farmers in Canada have a written succession plan. As the farming population ages and fewer people enter the profession, understanding what promotes farmers to prepare succession plans is essential. Our study aimed to understand (a) the priorities farm operators have for developing a succession plan, (b) the factors that delay or motivate succession planning, and (c) the resources that would be helpful for creating a succession plan. Using dyadic multiple case study methodology, we interviewed 35 participants from 16 farms in Alberta, Canada. The thematic analysis revealed seven themes influencing decisions to develop a succession plan: legacy and identity, physical health, government policies, farm growth, professional guidance and expertise, family dynamics, and farm culture norms. From the themes, two overarching variables—risk perception and self-efficacy—shaped farmers’ readiness for succession planning and informed the development of the Farm Succession Readiness Framework. This framework categorizes farmers into four types: Active Planners, Succession Avoiders, Back Burners, and End-of-the-Line Farmers. Farm succession planning is complex and multifaceted, and our findings may assist advisors, policymakers, and researchers in understanding farmers and tailoring interventions to meet their needs.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca Purc-Stephenson & Casey Hartman & Ella Kim Marriott & Stefanie Phillips & Cale Scotton, 2025. "Understanding Farmers’ Readiness to Develop a Succession Plan: Barriers, Motivators, and Preliminary Recommendations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-21, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:270-:d:1558835
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/270/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/270/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas Glauben & Martin Petrick & Hendrik Tietje & Christoph Weiss, 2009. "Probability and timing of succession or closure in family firms: a switching regression analysis of farm households in Germany," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 45-54.
    2. Rochelle Thompson & Briana N. M. Hagen & Margaret N. Lumley & Charlotte B. Winder & Basem Gohar & Andria Jones-Bitton, 2022. "Mental Health and Substance Use of Farmers in Canada during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Block, Julia B. & Michels, Marius & Mußhoff, Oliver, 2023. "A Trans-Theoretical Model for Farmers’ perceived Usefulness of Digital Risk Management Tools – A Case Study from Germany," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 72(03), January.
    4. Chloe M. E. Fletcher & Louise Stewart & Kate M. Gunn, 2023. "Stressors, Barriers and Facilitators Faced by Australian Farmers When Transitioning to Retirement: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-19, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Johanna Wilkes, 2026. "Influence and legitimacy in public policy: investigating the Canadian agricultural subsystem," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 43(2), pages 1-17, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Rebecca Purc-Stephenson & Nicole Roy & Adachukwu Chimaobi & Deanna Hood, 2024. "An Evidence-Based Guide for Delivering Mental Healthcare Services in Farming Communities: A Qualitative Study of Providers’ Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 21(6), pages 1-16, June.
    2. Thiermann, Insa & Breustedt, Gunnar & Rosenau, Carolin, . "Einfluss der Größe auf die Aufgabe der Tierproduktion – empirische Analyse Milchvieh und Sauen haltender Betriebe in Deutschland," German Journal of Agricultural Economics, Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics, vol. 68(3).
    3. Morais, Manoela & Binotto, Erlaine & Borges, João Augusto Rossi, 2017. "Identifying beliefs underlying successors’ intention to take over the farm," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 48-58.
    4. Victor Antonio Rodriguez Lizano & Mercedes Montero-Vega & Nicole Sibelet, 2023. "Drivers and actions that determine the choice of young farmers in Costa Rica to stay on the family farm," Post-Print hal-05180427, HAL.
    5. Ogawa, Keishi & Garrod, Guy & Yagi, Hironori, 2023. "Sustainability strategies and stakeholder management for upland farming," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    6. Dudek, Michał & Pawłowska, Aleksandra, 2022. "Can succession improve the economic situation of family farms in the short term? Evidence from Poland based on panel data," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    7. Petrick, Martin & Kloss, Mathias, 2018. "Identifying Agricultural Factor Productivity from Micro-data: A Review of Approaches with an Application to EU Countries," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 67(2), pages 67-79.
    8. Boufous, Sawssan & Robinson, Chadelle, 2025. "Farm/Ranch Succession: Are Young New Mexicans Interested?," Western Economics Forum, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 23(1).
    9. Hung-Hao Chang, 2013. "Old Farmer Pension Program and Farm Succession: Evidence from a Population-Based Survey of Farm Households in Taiwan," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 95(4), pages 976-991.
    10. Rochelle Thompson & Briana N. M. Hagen & Margaret N. Lumley & Charlotte B. Winder & Basem Gohar & Andria Jones-Bitton, 2023. "“An Incredible Amount of Stress before You Even Put a Shovel in the Ground”: A Mixed Methods Analysis of Farming Stressors in Canada," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    11. Jeanneaux, P & Desjeux, Y. & Enjolras, G. & Latruffe, L., 2017. "Farm value evaluation: methods and challenges," 21st Congress, Edinburgh, Scotland, July 2-7, 2017 345774, International Farm Management Association.
    12. Manel Plana-Farran & Unai Arzubiaga & Angel Blanch, 2023. "Successors’ Future Training in Family Farms: The Impact of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Factors," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4216-4237, December.
    13. Bertoni, Danilo & Cavicchioli, Daniele & Latruffe, Laure, "undated". "Performance post succession on Italian family farms," 2017 International Congress, August 28-September 1, 2017, Parma, Italy 261435, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    14. Pessotto, Ana Paula & Costa, Carlos & Schwinghamer, Timothy & Colle, Gabriel & Corte, Vitor Francisco Dalla, 2019. "Factors influencing intergenerational succession in family farm businesses in Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    15. Fertő, Imre & Bojnec, Štefan & Iwasaki, Ichiro & Shida, Yoshisada, 2024. "Why do corporate farms survive in Central and Eastern Europe?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    16. Banovic, Marija & Duesberg, Stefanie & Renwick, Alan & Keane, Mark & Bogue, Pat, 2015. "The Field: Land mobility measures as seen through the eyes of Irish farmers," 89th Annual Conference, April 13-15, 2015, Warwick University, Coventry, UK 204200, Agricultural Economics Society.
    17. Sobeida Velázquez, 2025. "Transfronterizx Family, Their Children, and U.S. Educators in Border Communities," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, April.
    18. Rodriguez-Lizano, Víctor & Montero-Vega, Mercedes, . "Probability Of Generational Agricultural Succession Explained Through A Holistic Structural Equations Model In Costa Rica," International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics (IJFAEC), Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat University, Department of Economics and Finance, vol. 8(4).
    19. Petrick, Martin & Kloss, Mathias, "undated". "Identifying factor productivity from micro-data: the case of EU agriculture," IAMO Discussion Papers 271870, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    20. Chacattrai Rayasawath, 2018. "Factors Affecting the Household Succession in Agricultural Occupation in Nakhon Ratchasima Province, Thailand," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-14, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:270-:d:1558835. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.