IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i1p259-d1558672.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of the Social Performance of Urban Stormwater Parks: A Case Study in Jinhua, Zhejiang

Author

Listed:
  • Yaohui Su

    (Academy of Art & Design, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)

  • Lingxiao Shu

    (Department of Architecture, School of Creative Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo 169-8555, Japan)

Abstract

An urban rain flood park refers to a park built with ecological function as the guide. The aim of this study is to examine the social benefits of urban stormwater landscapes. By establishing an evaluation model, conducting field research and analysis, comparing parks, and applying mathematical model analysis, the feedback from various user groups is assessed. The purpose is to explore whether ecologically oriented urban stormwater parks offer superior social benefits and to provide references for optimizing the benefits of urban stormwater park design. The paper selects Yanweizhou Park, Zhejiang Jinhua, a representative of innovative design practices in an urban rainwater park in China, as a case study for evaluation research and introduces the traditional park, Wuzhou Park, for comparison. The results show that Yanweizhou Park, which is designed based on ecology as the first principle, is still highly evaluated in terms of social performance. People think that ecological parks are more representative of the urban image. The eco-park is more popular with young people and more dispersed in activities. Both types of parks suffer from insufficient infrastructure construction.

Suggested Citation

  • Yaohui Su & Lingxiao Shu, 2025. "Evaluation of the Social Performance of Urban Stormwater Parks: A Case Study in Jinhua, Zhejiang," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-25, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:259-:d:1558672
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/259/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/1/259/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kai Wang & Jianjun Liu, 2017. "The Spatiotemporal Trend of City Parks in Mainland China between 1981 and 2014: Implications for the Promotion of Leisure Time Physical Activity and Planning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, September.
    2. Jisoo Sim & Cermetrius Lynell Bohannon & Patrick Miller, 2019. "What Park Visitors Survey Tells Us: Comparing Three Elevated Parks—The High Line, 606, and High Bridge," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Cohen, D.A. & McKenzie, T.L. & Sehgal, A. & Williamson, S. & Golinelli, D. & Lurie, N., 2007. "Contribution of public parks to physical activity," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 97(3), pages 509-514.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ziyan Lu & Tongxin Zhong & Yue Qiao & Guiyi Wu & Haishun Xu, 2025. "Enhancing Microclimate Sustainability: The Impact of Blue–Green–Gray Underlying Surfaces in Stormwater Parks Under Subtropical Monsoon Climates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-24, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mark P.C. Cherrie & Niamh K. Shortt & Catharine Ward Thompson & Ian J. Deary & Jamie R. Pearce, 2019. "Association Between the Activity Space Exposure to Parks in Childhood and Adolescence and Cognitive Aging in Later Life," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-13, February.
    2. Xiaohu Zhang & Scott Melbourne & Chinmoy Sarkar & Alain Chiaradia & Chris Webster, 2020. "Effects of green space on walking: Does size, shape and density matter?," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(16), pages 3402-3420, December.
    3. Boncinelli, Fabio & Riccioli, Francesco & Marone, Enrico, 2015. "Do forests help to keep my body mass index low?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 11-17.
    4. Nam Nguyen-Dinh & Heng Zhang, 2025. "Do Positive Environmental Changes Impact Residents’ Intention of Rural Development? Role of Leisure and Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-20, February.
    5. Stephanie A. Prince & Elizabeth A. Kristjansson & Katherine Russell & Jean-Michel Billette & Michael Sawada & Amira Ali & Mark S. Tremblay & Denis Prud’homme, 2011. "A Multilevel Analysis of Neighbourhood Built and Social Environments and Adult Self-Reported Physical Activity and Body Mass Index in Ottawa, Canada," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-26, October.
    6. Olga L. Sarmiento & Ana Paola Rios & Diana C. Paez & Karoll Quijano & Rogério César Fermino, 2017. "The Recreovía of Bogotá, a Community-Based Physical Activity Program to Promote Physical Activity among Women: Baseline Results of the Natural Experiment Al Ritmo de las Comunidades," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Qin Huang & Ryosuke Shimoda & Yingnan Jiao & Jingyi Yin & Junhua Zhang & Shiro Takeda, 2025. "The Influence of Usage and Spatial Experiences on Personal Desirability of a Park Plan: Using Structural Equation Modeling—A Case Study of a Park near a Station in a Suburban City in Japan," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-24, January.
    8. Antonios Kolimenakis & Alexandra D. Solomou & Nikolaos Proutsos & Evangelia V. Avramidou & Evangelia Korakaki & Georgios Karetsos & Georgios Maroulis & Eleftherios Papagiannis & Konstantinia Tsagkari, 2021. "The Socioeconomic Welfare of Urban Green Areas and Parks; A Literature Review of Available Evidence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-26, July.
    9. Elliott, Lewis R. & White, Mathew P. & Taylor, Adrian H. & Herbert, Stephen, 2015. "Energy expenditure on recreational visits to different natural environments," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 53-60.
    10. Mohammad Paydar & Asal Kamani Fard & Verónica Gárate Navarrete, 2023. "Design Characteristics, Visual Qualities, and Walking Behavior in an Urban Park Setting," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, September.
    11. Zhou, Min & Tan, Shukui & Tao, Yinghui & Lu, Yongzhong & Zhang, Zuo & Zhang, Lu & Yan, Danping, 2017. "Neighborhood socioeconomics, food environment and land use determinants of public health: Isolating the relative importance for essential policy insights," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 246-253.
    12. Congbao Xu & Jing Wang & Yanxue Li & Weijun Gao, 2023. "Evaluation and Optimization Design of Coastal Cycling Environment Based on Importance Performance Analysis," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, August.
    13. Bittencourt, Tainá A. & Giannotti, Mariana, 2023. "Evaluating the accessibility and availability of public services to reduce inequalities in everyday mobility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    14. Amy Hillier & Bing Han & Theodore S. Eisenman & Kelly R. Evenson & Thomas L. McKenzie & Deborah A. Cohen, 2016. "Using Systematic Observations to Understand Conditions that Promote Interracial Experiences in Neighbourhood Parks," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 1(4), pages 51-64.
    15. Haiyun Xu & Tobias Plieninger & Jørgen Primdahl, 2019. "A Systematic Comparison of Cultural and Ecological Landscape Corridors in Europe," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-32, February.
    16. Kai Wang & Jianjun Liu, 2017. "The Spatiotemporal Trend of City Parks in Mainland China between 1981 and 2014: Implications for the Promotion of Leisure Time Physical Activity and Planning," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-15, September.
    17. Jeffrey Wilson & Xiao Xiao, 2023. "The Economic Value of Health Benefits Associated with Urban Park Investment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(6), pages 1-13, March.
    18. Rachel Tolbert Kimbro & Jeanne Brooks-Gunn & Sara McLanahan, 2010. "Neighborhood Context, Poverty, and Urban Children's Outdoor Play," Working Papers 1226, Princeton University, School of Public and International Affairs, Center for Research on Child Wellbeing..
    19. Ruochen Ma & Yuxin Luo & Katsunori Furuya, 2023. "Gender Differences and Optimizing Women’s Experiences: An Exploratory Study of Visual Behavior While Viewing Urban Park Landscapes in Tokyo, Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-14, February.
    20. Siqi Feng & Yuefei Zhuo & Zhongguo Xu & Yang Chen & Guan Li & Xueqi Wang, 2024. "Nature’s Neighborhood: The Housing Premium of Urban Parks in Dense Cities," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-19, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:1:p:259-:d:1558672. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.