IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i18p8449-d1754064.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial Assessment of Ecotourism Development Suitability Incorporating Carrying Capacity in the Yellow River Estuary National Park

Author

Listed:
  • Haoyu Wang

    (College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
    Observation and Research Station of Bohai Strait Eco-Corridor, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao 266061, China)

  • Yanming Zhang

    (Qingdao Municipal Landscape Gardens and Forestry Bureau, Qingdao 266075, China)

  • Quanbin Wang

    (First Institute of Oceanography, Ministry of Natural Resources, Qingdao 266061, China)

  • Jing Yu

    (College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China
    Institute of Marine Development, Ocean University of China, Qingdao 266100, China)

  • Chunjiu Yuan

    (Qingdao Municipal Landscape Gardens and Forestry Bureau, Qingdao 266075, China)

Abstract

Ecotourism is vital for harmonious human–nature coexistence in national parks, making the quantification of its spatial suitability an urgent scientific priority. This study took the Yellow River Estuary National Park (YRENP) as the study area and constructed a multi-criteria evaluation model by interpreting the relationship between Ecotourism Environmental Carrying Capacity (EECC) and Ecotourism Development Suitability (EDS), addressing the critical gap in the integrated land–sea ecotourism suitability assessment for coastal national parks, using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) to determine indicator weights and ArcGIS for spatial visualization. Multi-source geospatial data, including land use, NDVI, DEM, and socio-economic datasets, were integrated. The results revealed the following: (1) Overall moderate EECC levels with stronger terrestrial capacity contrast with weaker marine capacity—high-carrying zones being limited to nearshore areas; (2) The overall EDS level was favorable, where southern section significantly outperformed northern zones, forming concentrated high-suitability clusters encircling lower-suitability areas; (3) Marine EDS slightly exceeds terrestrial suitability, with optimal coastal zones transitioning landward toward progressively higher suitability. This research provided a replicable methodology for ecotourism suitability assessment in coastal protected areas and supported sustainable spatial planning in land–sea integrated national parks.

Suggested Citation

  • Haoyu Wang & Yanming Zhang & Quanbin Wang & Jing Yu & Chunjiu Yuan, 2025. "Spatial Assessment of Ecotourism Development Suitability Incorporating Carrying Capacity in the Yellow River Estuary National Park," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-23, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8449-:d:1754064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8449/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/18/8449/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guoqing Chen & Saifei Wang, 2023. "Evaluation of Urban Resource Environmental Carrying Capacity and Land Spatial Development Suitability in a Semiarid Area of the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Arrow, Kenneth & Bolin, Bert & Costanza, Robert & Dasgupta, Partha & Folke, Carl & Holling, C.S. & Jansson, Bengt-Owe & Levin, Simon & Mäler, Karl-Göran & Perrings, Charles & Pimentel, David, 1996. "Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment," Environment and Development Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 104-110, February.
    3. Ronizi, Saeed Reza Akbarian & Mokarram, Marzieh & Negahban, Saeed, 2020. "Utilizing multi-criteria decision to determine the best location for the ecotourism in the east and central of Fars province, Iran," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    4. Xianlei Dong & Shan Gao & Airong Xu & Zhikun Luo & Beibei Hu, 2022. "Research on Tourism Carrying Capacity and the Coupling Coordination Relationships between Its Influencing Factors: A Case Study of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-28, November.
    5. Costanza, Robert, 1995. "Economic growth, carrying capacity, and the environment," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 89-90, November.
    6. Yu Chen & Shuangshuang Liu & Wenbo Ma & Qian Zhou, 2023. "Assessment of the Carrying Capacity and Suitability of Spatial Resources and the Environment and Diagnosis of Obstacle Factors in the Yellow River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-26, February.
    7. Qin Huang & Chen Zhou & Manchun Li & Yu Ma & Song Hua, 2024. "An Approach for Mapping Ecotourism Suitability Using Machine Learning: A Case Study of Zhangjiajie, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Opschoor, J. (Hans) B., 1995. "Ecospace and the fall and rise of throughput intensity," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 15(2), pages 137-140, November.
    2. Kaika, Dimitra & Zervas, Efthimios, 2013. "The environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) theory. Part B: Critical issues," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 1403-1411.
    3. G. Mythili & Shibashis Mukherjee, 2011. "Examining Environmental Kuznets Curve for river effluents in India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 13(3), pages 627-640, June.
    4. George Halkos & Iacovos Psarianos, 2016. "Exploring the effect of including the environment in the neoclassical growth model," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 18(3), pages 339-358, July.
    5. Carmen van der Merwe & Martin de Wit, 2021. "An In-Depth Investigation into the Relationship Between Municipal Solid Waste Generation and Economic Growth in the City of Cape Town," Working Papers 07/2021, Stellenbosch University, Department of Economics, revised 2021.
    6. Thomas Bolognesi, 2015. "The water vulnerability of metro and megacities: An investigation of structural determinants," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 39(2), pages 123-133, May.
    7. Figge, Frank & Hahn, Tobias & Barkemeyer, Ralf, 2014. "The If, How and Where of assessing sustainable resource use," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 274-283.
    8. Rothman, Dale S., 1998. "Environmental Kuznets curves--real progress or passing the buck?: A case for consumption-based approaches," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 25(2), pages 177-194, May.
    9. B. Venkatraja, 2021. "Does China exhibit any evidence of an Environmental Kuznets Curve? An ARDL bounds testing approach," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 1, pages 88-110,111-.
    10. Andreoni, James & Levinson, Arik, 2001. "The simple analytics of the environmental Kuznets curve," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(2), pages 269-286, May.
    11. Edyta Kiedrzyńska & Marcin Kiedrzyński & Maciej Zalewski, 2015. "Sustainable floodplain management for flood prevention and water quality improvement," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 76(2), pages 955-977, March.
    12. W. Neil Adger & Jennifer Hodbod, 2014. "Ecological and social resilience," Chapters, in: Giles Atkinson & Simon Dietz & Eric Neumayer & Matthew Agarwala (ed.), Handbook of Sustainable Development, chapter 6, pages 91-102, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    13. Costantini, Valeria & Monni, Salvatore, 2008. "Environment, human development and economic growth," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 64(4), pages 867-880, February.
    14. Himayatullah Khan & Ehsan Inamullah & Khadija Shams, 2009. "Population, environment and poverty in Pakistan: linkages and empirical evidence," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 11(2), pages 375-392, April.
    15. Funk, Matt, 2008. "On the Problem of Sustainable Economic Development: A Theoretical Solution to this Prisoner's Dilemma," MPRA Paper 19025, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 08 Jun 2008.
    16. Marta Santagata & Enrico Ivaldi & Riccardo Soliani, 2019. "Development and Governance in the Ex-Soviet Union: An Empirical Inquiry," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 157-190, January.
    17. Shenglan Ma & Junlin Huang, 2023. "Analysis of the spatio-temporal coupling coordination mechanism supporting economic resilience and high-quality economic development in the urban agglomeration in the middle reaches of the Yangtze Riv," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(2), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Hörisch, Jacob & Ortas, Eduardo & Schaltegger, Stefan & Álvarez, Igor, 2015. "Environmental effects of sustainability management tools: An empirical analysis of large companies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 241-249.
    19. Baumgärtner, Stefan & Quaas, Martin F., 2009. "Ecological-economic viability as a criterion of strong sustainability under uncertainty," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(7), pages 2008-2020, May.
    20. Roca, Jordi & Serrano, Monica, 2007. "Income growth and atmospheric pollution in Spain: An input-output approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 63(1), pages 230-242, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:18:p:8449-:d:1754064. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.