IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7802-d1737705.html

Spatial Analysis of Public Transport and Urban Mobility in Mexicali, B.C., Mexico: Towards Sustainable Solutions in Developing Cities

Author

Listed:
  • Julio Calderón-Ramírez

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali 21280, Mexico)

  • Manuel Gutiérrez-Moreno

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali 21280, Mexico)

  • Alejandro Mungaray-Moctezuma

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali 21280, Mexico)

  • Alejandro Sánchez-Atondo

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali 21280, Mexico)

  • Leonel García-Gómez

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali 21280, Mexico)

  • Marco Montoya-Alcaraz

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali 21280, Mexico)

  • Itzel Núñez-López

    (Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Mexicali 21280, Mexico)

Abstract

Historically, traditional transportation planning has promoted public policies focused on building and maintaining infrastructure for private cars to improve travel efficiency. This approach presents a significant challenge for cities in the Global South due to their unique socioeconomic conditions and urban development patterns. Dedicated public transport infrastructure can make better use of the road network by moving more people and reducing congestion. Beyond its environmental benefits, it also provides the population with greater accessibility, creating new development opportunities. This study uses Mexicali, Mexico, a medium-sized city with dispersed urban growth and a high dependence on cars, as a case study. The goal is to identify the relationship between the supply of public bus routes and actual work-related commuting patterns. The methodology considers that, given the scarcity of economic resources and prior studies in the Global South, using Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for the spatial analysis of travel is a key tool for redesigning more inclusive and sustainable public transport systems. Specifically, this study utilized origin–destination survey data from 14 urban areas to assess modal coverage, work-related commuting patterns, and the spatial distribution of employment centres. The findings reveal a marked misalignment between the existing public transport network and the population’s travel needs, particularly in marginalized areas. Users face long travel times, multiple transfers, low service frequency, and limited connectivity to key employment areas. This configuration reinforces an exclusionary urban structure, with negative impacts on equity, modal efficiency, and sustainability. The study concludes that GIS-based spatial analysis generates sufficient evidence to redesign the public transport system and reorient urban mobility policy toward sustainability and social inclusion.

Suggested Citation

  • Julio Calderón-Ramírez & Manuel Gutiérrez-Moreno & Alejandro Mungaray-Moctezuma & Alejandro Sánchez-Atondo & Leonel García-Gómez & Marco Montoya-Alcaraz & Itzel Núñez-López, 2025. "Spatial Analysis of Public Transport and Urban Mobility in Mexicali, B.C., Mexico: Towards Sustainable Solutions in Developing Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-25, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7802-:d:1737705
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7802/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7802/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mokhtarian, Patricia L. & Cao, Xinyu, 2008. "Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: A focus on methodologies," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 42(3), pages 204-228, March.
    2. Xinyu (Jason) Cao & Patricia L. Mokhtarian & Susan L. Handy, 2008. "Examining the Impacts of Residential Self‐Selection on Travel Behaviour: A Focus on Empirical Findings," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 29(3), pages 359-395, October.
    3. Vasco Santos & Nuno Almeida, 2022. "Ethical Marketing Model for Luxury Hotel Chains: Development and Validation of a Performance Evaluation Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-17, June.
    4. De Vos, Jonas & Derudder, Ben & Van Acker, Veronique & Witlox, Frank, 2012. "Reducing car use: changing attitudes or relocating? The influence of residential dissonance on travel behavior," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 1-9.
    5. Enver Cenan İnce, 2025. "Mapping the Path to Sustainable Urban Mobility: A Bibliometric Analysis of Global Trends and Innovations in Transportation Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-32, February.
    6. Heejoo Son & Jinhyeok Jang & Jihan Park & Akos Balog & Patrick Ballantyne & Heeseo Rain Kwon & Alex Singleton & Jinuk Hwang, 2025. "Leveraging Advanced Technologies for (Smart) Transportation Planning: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-35, March.
    7. Dorina Pojani & Dominic Stead, 2015. "Sustainable Urban Transport in the Developing World: Beyond Megacities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-22, June.
    8. Cao, Xinyu & Mokhtarian, Patricia & Handy, Susan, 2008. "Examining The Impacts of Residential Self-Selection on Travel Behavior: Methodologies and Empirical Findings," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt08x1k476, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    9. Mitra, Suman K. & Saphores, Jean-Daniel M., 2019. "Why do they live so far from work? Determinants of long-distance commuting in California," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    10. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    11. David Levinson & Ajay Kumar, 1994. "The Rational Locator: Why Travel Times Have Remained Stable," Working Papers 199402, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    12. Delbosc, Alexa & Currie, Graham, 2011. "Exploring the relative influences of transport disadvantage and social exclusion on well-being," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(4), pages 555-562, August.
    13. Hensher, David A. & Beck, Matthew J. & Wei, Edward, 2021. "Working from home and its implications for strategic transport modelling based on the early days of the COVID-19 pandemic," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 64-78.
    14. Schwanen, Tim & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2005. "What Affects Commute Mode Choice: Neighborhood Physical Structure or Preferences Toward Neighborhoods?," University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt4nq9r1c9, University of California Transportation Center.
    15. Páez, Antonio & Scott, Darren M. & Morency, Catherine, 2012. "Measuring accessibility: positive and normative implementations of various accessibility indicators," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 141-153.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janke, Julia, 2021. "Re-visiting residential self-selection and dissonance: Does intra-household decision-making change the results?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 379-401.
    2. Jarass, Julia & Scheiner, Joachim, 2018. "Residential self-selection and travel mode use in a new inner-city development neighbourhood in Berlin," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 68-77.
    3. Kamruzzaman, Md. & Baker, Douglas & Washington, Simon & Turrell, Gavin, 2013. "Residential dissonance and mode choice," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 12-28.
    4. Xinyu Cao & Patricia L. Mokhtarian, 2012. "The connections among accessibility, self- selection and walking behaviour: a case study of Northern California residents," Chapters, in: Karst T. Geurs & Kevin J. Krizek & Aura Reggiani (ed.), Accessibility Analysis and Transport Planning, chapter 5, pages 73-95, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    5. De Vos, Jonas & Van Acker, Veronique & Witlox, Frank, 2014. "The influence of attitudes on Transit-Oriented Development: An explorative analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 326-329.
    6. Humphreys, John & Ahern, Aoife, 2019. "Is travel based residential self-selection a significant influence in modal choice and household location decisions?," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 150-160.
    7. Shen, Qing & Chen, Peng & Pan, Haixiao, 2016. "Factors affecting car ownership and mode choice in rail transit-supported suburbs of a large Chinese city," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 31-44.
    8. Islam, Md Rabiul & Saphores, Jean-Daniel M., 2022. "An L.A. story: The impact of housing costs on commuting," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    9. van Wee, Bert & De Vos, Jonas & Maat, Kees, 2019. "Impacts of the built environment and travel behaviour on attitudes: Theories underpinning the reverse causality hypothesis," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    10. Große, Juliane & Olafsson, Anton Stahl & Carstensen, Trine Agervig & Fertner, Christian, 2018. "Exploring the role of daily “modality styles” and urban structure in holidays and longer weekend trips: Travel behaviour of urban and peri-urban residents in Greater Copenhagen," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 138-149.
    11. Cao, Xinyu (Jason), 2015. "Heterogeneous effects of neighborhood type on commute mode choice: An exploration of residential dissonance in the Twin Cities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 48(C), pages 188-196.
    12. Li, Jianling, 2018. "Residential and transit decisions: Insights from focus groups of neighborhoods around transit stations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-9.
    13. repec:osf:socarx:2p896_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Mendiola, Lorea & González, Pilar & Cebollada, Àngel, 2014. "The link between urban development and the modal split in commuting: the case of Biscay," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 1-9.
    15. Jingfei Zhang & Lijun Zhang & Yaochen Qin & Xia Wang & Zhicheng Zheng, 2019. "Impact of Residential Self-Selection on Low-Carbon Behavior: Evidence from Zhengzhou, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-17, December.
    16. Páez, Antonio, 2013. "Mapping travelers’ attitudes: does space matter?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 117-125.
    17. Werner, Carol M. & Brown, Barbara B. & Tribby, Calvin P. & Tharp, Doug & Flick, Kristi & Miller, Harvey J. & Smith, Ken R. & Jensen, Wyatt, 2016. "Evaluating the attractiveness of a new light rail extension: Testing simple change and displacement change hypotheses," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 15-23.
    18. Kamruzzaman, Md. & Baker, Douglas & Washington, Simon & Turrell, Gavin, 2014. "Advance transit oriented development typology: case study in Brisbane, Australia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 54-70.
    19. Van Acker, Veronique & Ho, Loan & Stevens, Larissa & Mulley, Corinne, 2020. "Quantifying the effects of childhood and previous residential experiences on the use of public transport," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    20. Lin, Tao & Wang, Donggen & Zhou, Meng, 2018. "Residential relocation and changes in travel behavior: what is the role of social context change?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 360-374.
    21. Bert Van Wee & David Banister, 2016. "How to Write a Literature Review Paper?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(2), pages 278-288, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7802-:d:1737705. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.