IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i17p7656-d1732026.html

Preventing Snow-Induced Traffic Isolation Through Data-Driven Control: Toward Resilient and Sustainable Highway Management

Author

Listed:
  • Sang-Hoon Lee

    (Disaster & Risk Management Laboratory, Interdisciplinary Program in Crisis & Disaster and Risk Management Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea)

  • Yoo-Kyung Lee

    (Disaster & Risk Management Laboratory, Interdisciplinary Program in Crisis & Disaster and Risk Management Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea)

  • Hong-Sik Yun

    (Geodesy Laboratory, Civil & Architectural and Environmental System Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea)

  • Seung-Jun Lee

    (Geodesy Laboratory, Civil & Architectural and Environmental System Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University (SKKU), Suwon 16419, Gyeonggi, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

This study develops a data-driven framework to prevent traffic isolation on snow-affected highways by analyzing vehicle detection system (VDS) data collected over the past decade in the Yeongdong region of the Republic of Korea. Specifically, we used hourly traffic volume and average travel speed between interchange to interchange (IC-IC) segments on days with cumulative snowfall exceeding 30 cm, enabling the identification of critical thresholds that trigger congestion and isolation under extreme snow conditions. By examining the correlation between hourly snowfall intensity, traffic volume, and travel speed, we identified critical thresholds that signal the onset of traffic congestion and isolation, where traffic congestion refers to temporary flow deterioration with average speeds falling below 40 km/h, and traffic isolation denotes and operational breakdown characterized by average travel speeds falling below 20 km/h and prolonged loss of roadway functionality. Results indicated that when snowfall intensity exceeded 2 cm per hour, traffic congestion generally emerged once hourly volumes surpassed 1500 vehicles, whereas traffic isolation became likely when volumes exceeded 2200 vehicles per hour. Building on these findings, this study proposes adaptive traffic control measures that can be proactively implemented during snowstorm conditions. The proposed framework further provides a basis for determining the optimal timing of intervention before isolation occurs, thereby preventing operational breakdowns and enhancing both the resilience and sustainability of winter highway operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Sang-Hoon Lee & Yoo-Kyung Lee & Hong-Sik Yun & Seung-Jun Lee, 2025. "Preventing Snow-Induced Traffic Isolation Through Data-Driven Control: Toward Resilient and Sustainable Highway Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-32, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7656-:d:1732026
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7656/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/17/7656/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liang Jia & Saini Yang & Weiping Wang & Xinlong Zhang, 2022. "Impact analysis of highways in China under future extreme precipitation," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 110(2), pages 1097-1113, January.
    2. Datla, Sandeep & Sharma, Satish, 2008. "Impact of cold and snow on temporal and spatial variations of highway traffic volumes," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 358-372.
    3. Chen Chen & Xiaohua Zhao & Hao Liu & Guichao Ren & Yunlong Zhang & Xiaoming Liu, 2019. "Assessing the Influence of Adverse Weather on Traffic Flow Characteristics Using a Driving Simulator and VISSIM," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-16, February.
    4. Michael K. Lindell & Ronald W. Perry, 2012. "The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(4), pages 616-632, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Annabelle Workman & Penelope J. Jones & Amanda J. Wheeler & Sharon L. Campbell & Grant J. Williamson & Chris Lucani & David M.J.S. Bowman & Nick Cooling & Fay H. Johnston, 2021. "Environmental Hazards and Behavior Change: User Perspectives on the Usability and Effectiveness of the AirRater Smartphone App," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Zha, Wenbin & Li, Jian, 2025. "Understanding commuters' perceived accessibility and travel intentions under rainstorm warnings in Shanghai, China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 276-294.
    3. Julia S. Becker & Sally H. Potter & Lauren J. Vinnell & Kazuya Nakayachi & Sara K. McBride & David M. Johnston, 2020. "Earthquake early warning in Aotearoa New Zealand: a survey of public perspectives to guide warning system development," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-12, December.
    4. David V. Pynadath & Bistra Dilkina & David C. Jeong & Richard S. John & Stacy C. Marsella & Chirag Merchant & Lynn C. Miller & Stephen J. Read, 2023. "Disaster world," Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 84-117, March.
    5. Choi, Sunkyung & Maharjan, Rajali & Hong, Tran Thi Nhat & Hanaoka, Shinya, 2024. "Impact of information provision on tsunami evacuation behavior of residents and international tourists in Japan," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 264-273.
    6. Manqing Wu & Guochun Wu, 2020. "An Analysis of Rural Households’ Earthquake-Resistant Construction Behavior: Evidence from Pingliang and Yuxi, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(23), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Lingxin Min & Zhiyuan Yu, 2025. "Intergenerational Information-Sharing Behavior During the COVID-19 Pandemic in China: From Protective Action Decision Model Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-25, August.
    8. Ji Yun Lee & Fangjiao Ma & Yue Li, 2022. "Understanding homeowner proactive actions for managing wildfire risks," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 114(2), pages 1525-1547, November.
    9. Michael R. Greenberg & Marc D. Weiner & Robert Noland & Jeanne Herb & Marjorie Kaplan & Anthony J. Broccoli, 2014. "Public Support for Policies to Reduce Risk After Hurricane Sandy," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(6), pages 997-1012, June.
    10. Jiaqi Liu & Xiaodan Yu, 2025. "Social Media as a Catalyst for Sustainable Public Health Practices: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis of Protective Behaviors in China During the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-23, May.
    11. Seungil Yum, 2023. "Spatial response and power law distribution according to Winter storm Jonas," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(6), pages 5241-5255, December.
    12. Graf, Julia & Renner, Renate & Klebel, Thomas, 2025. "Bridging Warning and Adaptation Addressing Risk Communication Strategies for Short-Term Natural Hazard Warnings and Long-Term Risk Adaptation – A Scoping Review," SocArXiv tmwrv_v1, Center for Open Science.
    13. Andrea Cerase & Lorenzo Cugliari, 2023. "Something Still Remains: Factors Affecting Tsunami Risk Perception on the Coasts Hit by the Reggio Calabria-Messina 1908 Event (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-26, February.
    14. Yufei Liu & Yukuan Ou-Yang & Jian Wang & Lei Wang & Bing Li & Zimo Chen, 2025. "Research on Design of Underground Space for Refuge Based on Environmental Psychology and Virtual Reality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-32, August.
    15. Taixiang Duan & Hechao Jiang & Xiangshu Deng & Qiongwen Zhang & Fang Wang, 2020. "Government Intervention, Risk Perception, and the Adoption of Protective Action Recommendations: Evidence from the COVID-19 Prevention and Control Experience of China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-17, May.
    16. Raul P. Lejano & Muhammad Saidur Rahman & Laila Kabir, 2020. "Risk Communication for Empowerment: Interventions in a Rohingya Refugee Settlement," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 40(11), pages 2360-2372, November.
    17. Joop de Boer & W. J. Wouter Botzen & Teun Terpstra, 2014. "Improving Flood Risk Communication by Focusing on Prevention‐Focused Motivation," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 309-322, February.
    18. Morshedi, Mohamad Ali & Kashani, Hamed, 2022. "Assessment of vulnerability reduction policies: Integration of economic and cognitive models of decision-making," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    19. Chen, Cong & Zhang, Su & Zhang, Guohui & Bogus, Susan M. & Valentin, Vanessa, 2014. "Discovering temporal and spatial patterns and characteristics of pavement distress condition data on major corridors in New Mexico," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 148-158.
    20. Ye, Maoxin & Lyu, Zeyu, 2020. "Trust, risk perception, and COVID-19 infections: Evidence from multilevel analyses of combined original dataset in China," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:17:p:7656-:d:1732026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.