IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i15p7057-d1717025.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study of Multi-Stakeholder Mechanism in Inter-Provincial River Basin Eco-Compensation: Case of the Inland Rivers of Eastern China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhijie Cao

    (National Research Center for Resettlement, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

  • Xuelong Chen

    (National Research Center for Resettlement, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China
    School of Public Administration, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China)

Abstract

Based on a comprehensive review of the current research status of ecological compensation both domestically and internationally, combined with field survey data, this study delves into the issue of multi-stakeholder participation in the ecological compensation mechanisms of the Xin’an River Basin. This research reveals that the joint participation of multiple stakeholders is crucial to achieving the goals of ecological compensation in river basins. The government plays a significant role in macro-guidance, financial support, policy guarantees, supervision, and management. It promotes the comprehensive implementation of ecological environmental protection by formulating relevant laws and regulations, guiding the public to participate in ecological conservation, and supervising and punishing pollution behaviors. The public, serving as the main force, forms strong awareness and behavioral habits of ecological protection through active participation in environmental protection, monitoring, and feedback. As participants, enterprises contribute to industrial transformation and green development by improving resource utilization efficiency, reducing pollution emissions, promoting green industries, and participating in ecological restoration projects. Scientific research institutions, as technology enablers, have effectively enhanced governance efficiency through technological research and innovation, ecosystem value accounting to provide decision-making support, and public education. Social organizations, as facilitators, have injected vitality and innovation into watershed governance by extensively mobilizing social forces and building multi-party collaboration platforms. Communities, as supporters, have transformed ecological value into economic benefits by developing characteristic industries such as eco-agriculture and eco-tourism. Based on the above findings, further recommendations are proposed to mobilize the enthusiasm of upstream communities and encourage their participation in ecological compensation, promote the market-oriented operation of ecological compensation mechanisms, strengthen cross-regional cooperation to establish joint mechanisms, enhance supervision and evaluation, and establish a sound benefit-sharing mechanism. These recommendations provide theoretical support and practical references for ecological compensation worldwide.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhijie Cao & Xuelong Chen, 2025. "Study of Multi-Stakeholder Mechanism in Inter-Provincial River Basin Eco-Compensation: Case of the Inland Rivers of Eastern China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-16, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:7057-:d:1717025
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/7057/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/15/7057/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:15:p:7057-:d:1717025. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.