IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i14p6597-d1705281.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Threats and Opportunities for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use in the Buffer Zones of National Parks in the Brazilian Cerrado

Author

Listed:
  • Ana Cristina da Silva Soares

    (Institute of Geosciences, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

  • Edson Eyji Sano

    (Embrapa Cerrados, Planaltina 73301-970, Brazil)

  • Fabiana de Góis Aquino

    (Embrapa Cerrados, Planaltina 73301-970, Brazil)

  • Tati de Almeida

    (Institute of Geosciences, University of Brasília, Brasília 70910-900, Brazil)

Abstract

In recent decades, the Brazilian Cerrado has faced rapid land conversion, resulting in the loss of approximately half of its original vegetation cover. Most existing conservation units within the biome are increasingly threatened by the expansion of land use around their boundaries. The establishment of buffer zones with land use regulations may protect biodiversity within these protected areas. In this study, we evaluated and ranked the 10 km buffer zones of 15 national parks (NPs) located in the Cerrado biome, identifying their priority for biodiversity conservation and sustainable land use interventions. The analysis considered the following data: land use and land cover change from 2012 to 2020, extent of natural vegetation fragments, presence or absence of state and municipal conservation units within the buffer zones, and drainage density. Two multicriteria analysis methods, the analytic hierarchy process and the weighted linear combination, were applied to classify the buffer zones into five levels of threat: very high, high, moderate, low, and very low. Among the 15 buffer zones analyzed, 11 were classified as having high to very high priority for conservation actions. The buffer zones surrounding the Serra da Bodoquena, Emas, Canastra, and Brasília NPs were ranked as having very high priority. Between 2012 and 2020, the most severe reductions in ecological connectivity were observed in the buffer zones of Grande Sertão Veredas (44.5%), Nascentes do Rio Parnaíba (40.4%), and Serra das Confusões (36.7%). Given the relatively high proportion of natural vegetation in the buffer zones located in the northern Cerrado, we recommend prioritizing conservation efforts in this region. In contrast, in the southern portion of the biome, where land occupation is more intense, strategies should focus on promoting environmentally sustainable land use practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Ana Cristina da Silva Soares & Edson Eyji Sano & Fabiana de Góis Aquino & Tati de Almeida, 2025. "Threats and Opportunities for Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Use in the Buffer Zones of National Parks in the Brazilian Cerrado," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-21, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6597-:d:1705281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6597/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/14/6597/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wenwu Du & Sofia M. Penabaz-Wiley & Anthony Murithi Njeru & Isami Kinoshita, 2015. "Models and Approaches for Integrating Protected Areas with Their Surroundings: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(7), pages 1-27, June.
    2. Édson Luis Bolfe & Daniel de Castro Victoria & Edson Eyji Sano & Gustavo Bayma & Silvia Maria Fonseca Silveira Massruhá & Aryeverton Fortes de Oliveira, 2024. "Potential for Agricultural Expansion in Degraded Pasture Lands in Brazil Based on Geospatial Databases," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-17, February.
    3. Brayan Ricardo de Oliveira & Sónia Maria Carvalho-Ribeiro & Paulina Maria Maia-Barbosa, 2020. "A multiscale analysis of land use dynamics in the buffer zone of Rio Doce State Park, Minas Gerais, Brazil," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(5), pages 935-957, April.
    4. Carlos Henrique Pires Luiz & Valdir Adilson Steinke, 2022. "Recent Environmental Legislation in Brazil and the Impact on Cerrado Deforestation Rates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-15, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Colussi, Joana & Paulson, Nick & Schnitkey, Gary & Zulauf, Carl & Baltz, Jim, 2024. "Potential for Crop Expansion in Brazil Based on Pastureland and Double-Cropping," farmdoc daily, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, vol. 14(69).
    2. Rodrigo Neiva Santos & Stefanie Alvarenga Santos & Luís Gabriel Alves Cirne & Douglas dos Santos Pina & José Esler de Freitas Junior & José Augusto Gomes Azevedo & Robério Rodrigues Silva & Henry Dani, 2025. "Dietary Fiber Levels as a Sustainability Strategy in Lamb Production: Impacts on Digestion, Behavior, and Rumen Function," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-13, August.
    3. Ivan Bergier & Jayme G. A. Barbedo & Édson L. Bolfe & Luciana A. S. Romani & Ricardo Y. Inamasu & Silvia M. F. S. Massruhá, 2024. "Framing Concepts of Agriculture 5.0 via Bipartite Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-22, December.
    4. Bernadetta Zawilińska & Patrycja Brańka & Karol Majewski & Marcin Semczuk, 2021. "National Parks—Areas of Economic Development or Stagnation? Evidence from Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-24, October.
    5. Brayan Ricardo Oliveira & Sónia Maria Carvalho-Ribeiro & Paulina Maria Maia-Barbosa, 2021. "Rio Doce State Park buffer zone: forest fragmentation and land use dynamics," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 8365-8376, June.
    6. Wenwu Du & Sofia M Penabaz-Wiley & Isami Kinoshita, 2019. "Relationships between land use changes, stakeholders, and national scenic area administrations: A case study of Mount Jinfo and its surroundings in China," Environment and Planning C, , vol. 37(8), pages 1507-1530, December.
    7. Yuan Kang & Haolian Luan & Xiao Zhao & Chengzhao Wu, 2025. "Conceptual Evolution, Governance Transformation, and Spatial Planning Approaches for Protected Area–Community Conservation–Livelihood Trade-Offs," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Liang Chang & Teiji Watanabe & Hanlin Xu & Jiho Han, 2022. "Knowledge Mapping on Nepal’s Protected Areas Using CiteSpace and VOSviewer," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-23, July.
    9. Juliana Carmo Souza & Tatiana Sussel Gonçalves Mendes & Rafael Beltrame Bignotto & Enner Herenio Alcântara & Klécia Gili Massi, 2025. "Land use dynamics in a tropical protected area buffer zone: is the management plan helping?," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 15(1), pages 156-166, March.
    10. Ntuli, Herbert & Muchapondwa, Edwin & Okumu, Boscow, 2020. "Can local communities afford full control over wildlife conservation? The case of Zimbabwe," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 37(C).
    11. Mariane Paulina Batalha Roque & José Ambrósio Ferreira Neto & André Luiz Lopes Faria, 2022. "Degraded grassland and the conflict of land use in protected areas of hotspot in Brazil," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 1475-1492, January.
    12. Freitas Lima, Elizete Aparecida Checon & Ranieri, Victor Eduardo Lima, 2018. "Land use planning around protected areas: Case studies in four state parks in the Atlantic forest region of southeastern Brazil," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 453-458.
    13. Yufen Zhang & Hongfan Bu & Shengxi Cao & Xiongfei Zhao, 2021. "Performance-Based Design of a Main Exhibition Hall and Its Ecological Connectivity with Surroundings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-15, October.
    14. J. Marc Foggin, 2018. "Environmental Conservation in the Tibetan Plateau Region: Lessons for China’s Belt and Road Initiative in the Mountains of Central Asia," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-34, April.
    15. Lingyue Li & Zhixin Qi & Shi Xian & Dong Yao, 2021. "Agricultural Land Use Change in Chongqing and the Policy Rationale behind It: A Multiscale Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    16. Maryann Harris & Claire Cave & Karen Foley & Thomas Bolger & Tamara Hochstrasser, 2019. "Urbanisation of Protected Areas within the European Union—An Analysis of UNESCO Biospheres and the Need for New Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-26, October.
    17. Jie Yin & Xu Tang & Wenjia Zhang & Xiongfei Liang & Jiancheng Zhu, 2019. "Where to Preserve? Evaluating the Integrity Principle for Delineating Protection Scopes of Kaiping Diaolou and Villages," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-15, April.
    18. Reed, James & Ickowitz, Amy & Chervier, Colas & Djoudi, Houria & Moombe, Kaala & Ros-Tonen, Mirjam & Yanou, Malaika & Yuliani, Linda & Sunderland, Terry, 2020. "Integrated landscape approaches in the tropics: A brief stock-take," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:14:p:6597-:d:1705281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.