IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i13p6198-d1695976.html

Assessment of Ecological Environment Quality and Analysis of Its Driving Forces in the Dabie Mountain Area of Anhui Province Based on the Improved Remote Sensing Ecological Index

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Ding

    (School of Environmental and Energy Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China)

  • Guangzhou Chen

    (School of Environmental and Energy Engineering, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
    Cultivated Land Protection Innovation Demonstration Center of Anhui Province, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
    Anhui Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Waste Water Recycling, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China
    Anhui Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution Control and Waste Resource Utilization, Anhui Jianzhu University, Hefei 230601, China)

Abstract

The Dabie Mountain area in Anhui Province is an essential ecological security barrier and a critical protected area in East China. It is very important to assess its ecological environment quality and identify its key driving forces. Five indicators, including Greenness, Wetness, Dryness, Heat, and Biological Richness, were used to construct an improved remote sensing ecological Index (IRSEI) to assess ecological environment quality. The weights of the five indicators were determined by coupling the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the entropy weight method (EWM). The optimal parameters-based geographical detector (OPGD) was used to recognize driving factors. The main conclusions were as follows: (1) the overall rank of ecological environment quality was mainly good and excellent. The ecological quality of forest land was excellent, that of farmland was good, and that of built-up areas was poor. (2) The change in ecological environment quality was mainly stable from 2000 to 2020. The ecological quality of some forests and farmlands improved, with a deteriorating trend in the built-up areas. (3) The Moran’s Index of ecological quality ranged from 0.77 to 0.85, indicating high spatial agglomeration. (4) The OPGD indicated that the DEM had the most explanatory power for ecological quality, and the interactive relationship between the DEM and population density had the most significant impact. (5) In comparison to the conventional remote sensing ecological Index (RSEI), the IRSEI exhibited higher congruence with observed circumstances and improved ecological interpretability.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Ding & Guangzhou Chen, 2025. "Assessment of Ecological Environment Quality and Analysis of Its Driving Forces in the Dabie Mountain Area of Anhui Province Based on the Improved Remote Sensing Ecological Index," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-19, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6198-:d:1695976
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6198/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/13/6198/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Na Chen & Gang Cheng & Jie Yang & Huan Ding & Shi He, 2023. "Evaluation of Urban Ecological Environment Quality Based on Improved RSEI and Driving Factors Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Ying, Xiong & Zeng, Guang-Ming & Chen, Gui-Qiu & Tang, Lin & Wang, Ke-Lin & Huang, Dao-You, 2007. "Combining AHP with GIS in synthetic evaluation of eco-environment quality—A case study of Hunan Province, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 209(2), pages 97-109.
    3. Giovanni Forzieri & Vasilis Dakos & Nate G. McDowell & Alkama Ramdane & Alessandro Cescatti, 2022. "Emerging signals of declining forest resilience under climate change," Nature, Nature, vol. 608(7923), pages 534-539, August.
    4. Thomas Wiedmann & John Barrett, 2010. "A Review of the Ecological Footprint Indicator—Perceptions and Methods," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 2(6), pages 1-49, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guifang Yang & Zhenghong Chen, 2015. "RS-based fuzzy multiattribute assessment of eco-environmental vulnerability in the source area of the Lishui River of northwest Hunan Province, China," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 78(2), pages 1145-1161, September.
    2. Rui Zhao & Hualing He & Ning Zhang, 2015. "Regional Water Footprint Assessment: A Case Study of Leshan City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(12), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Moumita Palchaudhuri & Sujata Biswas, 2016. "Application of AHP with GIS in drought risk assessment for Puruliya district, India," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(3), pages 1905-1920, December.
    4. Majid Ebrahimi & Hamid Nejadsoleymani & Mohammad Reza Mansouri Daneshvar, 2019. "Land suitability map and ecological carrying capacity for the recognition of touristic zones in the Kalat region, Iran: a multi-criteria analysis based on AHP and GIS," Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, Springer, vol. 3(3), pages 697-718, October.
    5. Hui Li & Haitao Jing & Geding Yan & Huanchao Guo & Wenfei Luan, 2023. "Long-Term Ecological Environment Quality Evaluation and Its Driving Mechanism in Luoyang City," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Ming Shi & Fei Lin & Xia Jing & Bingyu Li & Yang Shi & Yimin Hu, 2023. "Ecological Environment Quality Assessment of Arid Areas Based on Improved Remote Sensing Ecological Index—A Case Study of the Loess Plateau," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-25, September.
    7. Suranjan Sinha & Surajit Chakraborty & Shatrajit Goswami, 2017. "Ecological footprint: an indicator of environmental sustainability of a surface coal mine," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 807-824, June.
    8. Luo, Jin & Zhang, Qi & Liang, Changming & Wang, Haiqi & Ma, Xinning, 2023. "An overview of the recent development of the Ground Source Heat Pump (GSHP) system in China," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 269-279.
    9. Jorge Quijada-Alarcón & Roberto Rodríguez-Rodríguez & Nicoletta González-Cancelas & Gabriel Bethancourt-Lasso, 2023. "Spatial Analysis of Territorial Connectivity and Accessibility in the Province of Coclé in Panama," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-21, July.
    10. Debrupa Chakraborty & Joyashree Roy, 2015. "Ecological footprint of paperboard and paper production unit in India," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 909-921, August.
    11. Min-Chun Yu & Min-Hong Su, 2017. "Using Fuzzy DEA for Green Suppliers Selection Considering Carbon Footprints," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(4), pages 1-11, March.
    12. Li, Lu & Shi, Zhi-Hua & Yin, Wei & Zhu, Dun & Ng, Sai Leung & Cai, Chong-Fa & Lei, A-Lin, 2009. "A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to eco-environmental vulnerability assessment for the danjiangkou reservoir area, China," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(23), pages 3439-3447.
    13. POPESCU Alexandra-Codruta & SIPOS Ciprian Alexandru, 2015. "Green Logistics - A Condition Of Sustainable Development," Revista Economica, Lucian Blaga University of Sibiu, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 67(4), pages 112-130.
    14. Jean-Marc Douguet & Martin O 'Connor & Jean-Pierre Doussoulin & Philippe Lanceleur & Karine Philippot, 2014. "L'Empreinte Écologique Du Parc Naturel De La Haute Vallée De Chevreuse : Du Concept À La Construction De L'Outil," Working Papers hal-01243385, HAL.
    15. Ting Chang & Degang Yang & Jinwei Huo & Fuqiang Xia & Zhiping Zhang, 2018. "Evaluation of Oasis Sustainability Based on Emergy and Decomposition Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-14, June.
    16. Coline C. F. Boonman & Josep M. Serra-Diaz & Selwyn Hoeks & Wen-Yong Guo & Brian J. Enquist & Brian Maitner & Yadvinder Malhi & Cory Merow & Robert Buitenwerf & Jens-Christian Svenning, 2024. "More than 17,000 tree species are at risk from rapid global change," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Naimah Alanazi, 2024. "Tree resources decline in Saudi Arabia: Climate change or pest attack causes?," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 70(5), pages 223-234.
    18. Meiling Han & Martin de Jong & Minghui Jiang, 2019. "City Branding and Industrial Transformation from Manufacturing to Services: Which Pathways do Cities in Central China Follow?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-46, October.
    19. Daniel Rainham & Rory Cantwell & Timothy Jason, 2013. "Nature Appropriation and Associations with Population Health in Canada’s Largest Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-16, March.
    20. Zefeng Chen & Weiguang Wang & Giovanni Forzieri & Alessandro Cescatti, 2024. "Transition from positive to negative indirect CO2 effects on the vegetation carbon uptake," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:13:p:6198-:d:1695976. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.