IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5471-d1678484.html

Use of Sands from Wastewater Treatment Plants as a Substitute for Natural Aggregate in the Context of a Circular Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Monika Czop

    (Department of Technologies and Installations for Waste Management, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, The Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 18, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Elwira Zajusz-Zubek

    (Department of Air Protection, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, The Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 22B, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Beata Łaźniewska-Piekarczyk

    (Department of Building Processes and Building Physics, Faculty of Civil Engineering, The Silesian University of Technology, Akademicka 5, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

Abstract

In light of the global raw material crisis and the ongoing degradation of the natural environment, this study provides a significant contribution to the advancement of the circular economy in the construction sector. The authors conducted a comprehensive analysis of the feasibility of using waste sands originating from wastewater treatment plants as substitutes for natural fine aggregates in concrete mixtures. The investigation included the evaluation of the physicochemical, environmental, and mechanical properties of the analyzed waste sands. The results demonstrate a high application potential for sewer cleaning sand (SC), which, in its current form, can be used in non-structural applications. The key advantages of the sand that was examined include a high sand-equivalent value (98.2%), low contents of impurities (LOI < 1.5%), and a favorable chemical composition. Leaching tests for harmful substances, including heavy metals, for both the sand and the mortar samples, did not indicate any significant environmental risk. One principal conclusion of the study is the identification of the possibility of closing the waste life cycle at the wastewater treatment plant stage, which could significantly contribute to the reduction of landfilled waste volumes and operational costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Monika Czop & Elwira Zajusz-Zubek & Beata Łaźniewska-Piekarczyk, 2025. "Use of Sands from Wastewater Treatment Plants as a Substitute for Natural Aggregate in the Context of a Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-20, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5471-:d:1678484
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5471/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5471/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Huang, Lizhen & Krigsvoll, Guri & Johansen, Fred & Liu, Yongping & Zhang, Xiaoling, 2018. "Carbon emission of global construction sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 1906-1916.
    2. Maja Kępniak & Paweł Łukowski, 2024. "Multicriteria Analysis of Cement Mortar with Recycled Sand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-13, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Junlong Peng & Zhuo Su & Xiao Liu & Chongsen Ma, 2025. "Promoting Low-Carbonization in the Construction Supply Chain: Key Influencing Factors and Sustainable Practices," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-36, April.
    2. Zhang, Yanfang & Gao, Qi & Wei, Jinpeng & Shi, Xunpeng & Zhou, Dequn, 2023. "Can China's energy-consumption permit trading scheme achieve the “Porter” effect? Evidence from an estimated DSGE model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    3. Liu, Lirong & Huang, Guohe & Baetz, Brian & Huang, Charley Z. & Zhang, Kaiqiang, 2019. "Integrated GHG emissions and emission relationships analysis through a disaggregated ecologically-extended input-output model; A case study for Saskatchewan, Canada," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 97-109.
    4. Marin Pellan & Denise Almeida & Mathilde Louërat & Guillaume Habert, 2024. "Integrating Consumption-Based Metrics into Sectoral Carbon Budgets to Enhance Sustainability Monitoring of Building Activities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-25, August.
    5. Pérez-Sánchez, Laura À. & Velasco-Fernández, Raúl & Giampietro, Mario, 2022. "Factors and actions for the sustainability of the residential sector. The nexus of energy, materials, space, and time use," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    6. Vitória Silva Martins de Oliveira & José Anselmo da Silva Neto & Gustavo Lira do Nascimento & Marcos Alyssandro Soares dos Anjos & Ricardo Peixoto Suassuna Dutra & Cinthia Maia Pederneiras, 2025. "Evaluating Porcelain Polishing Waste as a Pyro-Expansive Agent in Clay Formulations for Sustainable Lightweight Aggregates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-27, August.
    7. Wenchao Li & Jian Xu & Zhengming Wang & Jialiang Yang, 2020. "The impact of LCTI on China's low-carbon transformation from the spatial spillover perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-11, November.
    8. Yeguan Yu, 2023. "The Impact of Financial System on Carbon Intensity: From the Perspective of Digitalization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-22, January.
    9. Li, Dezhi & Huang, Guanying & Zhu, Shiyao & Chen, Long & Wang, Jiangbo, 2021. "How to peak carbon emissions of provincial construction industry? Scenario analysis of Jiangsu Province," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    10. Lachlan Curmi & Kumudu Kaushalya Weththasinghe & Muhammad Atiq Ur Rehman Tariq, 2022. "Global Policy Review on Embodied Flows: Recommendations for Australian Construction Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, November.
    11. Alberto Bezama & Jakob Hildebrandt & Daniela Thrän, 2021. "Integrating Regionalized Socioeconomic Considerations onto Life Cycle Assessment for Evaluating Bioeconomy Value Chains: A Case Study on Hybrid Wood–Concrete Ceiling Elements," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, April.
    12. Long Li & Yinting Li, 2022. "The Spatial Relationship between CO 2 Emissions and Economic Growth in the Construction Industry: Based on the Tapio Decoupling Model and STIRPAT Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.
    13. Mengcheng Li & Haimeng Liu & Shangkun Yu & Jianshi Wang & Yi Miao & Chengxin Wang, 2022. "Estimating the Decoupling between Net Carbon Emissions and Construction Land and Its Driving Factors: Evidence from Shandong Province, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-26, July.
    14. Senchang Hu & Shaoyi Li & Xiangxin Meng & Yingzheng Peng & Wenzhe Tang, 2023. "Study on Regional Differences of Carbon Emission Efficiency: Evidence from Chinese Construction Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Karlsson, Ida & Rootzén, Johan & Johnsson, Filip, 2020. "Reaching net-zero carbon emissions in construction supply chains – Analysis of a Swedish road construction project," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    16. Ye, Fengyang & Wei, Hanlin & Xiao, Yan & Berardi, Umberto & Quaranta, Giuseppe & Demartino, Cristoforo, 2025. "Bio-based insulation materials in sustainable constructions: A review of environmental, thermal and acoustic insulation, durability, and mechanical performances," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    17. Yunfei Hou & Shouwei Liu, 2024. "Predictive Modeling and Validation of Carbon Emissions from China’s Coastal Construction Industry: A BO-XGBoost Ensemble Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-19, May.
    18. Lisa Stelzer & Friederike Hoberg & Vanessa Bach & Bertram Schmidt & Sven Pfeiffer & Vera Meyer & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2021. "Life Cycle Assessment of Fungal-Based Composite Bricks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    19. Onat, Nuri Cihat & Kucukvar, Murat, 2020. "Carbon footprint of construction industry: A global review and supply chain analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 124(C).
    20. Pan, Xiongfeng & Guo, Shucen & Xu, Haitao & Tian, Mengyuan & Pan, Xianyou & Chu, Junhui, 2022. "China's carbon intensity factor decomposition and carbon emission decoupling analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PC).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5471-:d:1678484. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.