IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i12p5329-d1675126.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable Transition Pathways for Steel Manufacturing: Low-Carbon Steelmaking Technologies in Enterprises

Author

Listed:
  • Jinghua Zhang

    (Yisheng College/College of Iron & Steel Carbon Neutrality, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China)

  • Haoyu Guo

    (College of Metallurgy and Energy, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China)

  • Gaiyan Yang

    (Yisheng College/College of Iron & Steel Carbon Neutrality, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China)

  • Yan Wang

    (Yanzhao Iron and Steel Laboratory, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China)

  • Wei Chen

    (Yisheng College/College of Iron & Steel Carbon Neutrality, North China University of Science and Technology, Tangshan 063210, China)

Abstract

Amid escalating global climate crises and the urgent imperative to meet the Paris Agreement’s carbon neutrality targets, the steel industry—a leading contributor to global greenhouse gas emissions—confronts unprecedented challenges in driving sustainable industrial transformation through innovative low-carbon steelmaking technologies. This paper examines decarbonization technologies across three stages (source, process, and end-of-pipe) for two dominant steel production routes: the long process (BF-BOF) and the short process (EAF). For the BF-BOF route, carbon reduction at the source stage is achieved through high-proportion pellet charging in the blast furnace and high scrap ratio utilization; at the process stage, carbon control is optimized via bottom-blowing O 2 -CO 2 -CaO composite injection in the converter; and at the end-of-pipe stage, CO 2 recycling and carbon capture are employed to achieve deep decarbonization. In contrast, the EAF route establishes a low-carbon production system by relying on green and efficient electric arc furnaces and hydrogen-based shaft furnaces. At the source stage, energy consumption is reduced through the use of green electricity and advanced equipment; during the process stage, precision smelting is realized through intelligent control systems; and at the end-of-pipe stage, a closed-loop is achieved by combining cascade waste heat recovery and steel slag resource utilization. Across both process routes, hydrogen-based direct reduction and green power-driven EAF technology demonstrate significant emission reduction potential, providing key technical support for the low-carbon transformation of the steel industry. Comparative analysis of industrial applications reveals varying emission reduction efficiencies, economic viability, and implementation challenges across different technical pathways. The study concludes that deep decarbonization of the steel industry requires coordinated policy incentives, technological innovation, and industrial chain collaboration. Accelerating large-scale adoption of low-carbon metallurgical technologies through these synergistic efforts will drive the global steel sector toward sustainable development goals. This study provides a systematic evaluation of current low-carbon steelmaking technologies and outlines practical implementation strategies, contributing to the industry’s decarbonization efforts.

Suggested Citation

  • Jinghua Zhang & Haoyu Guo & Gaiyan Yang & Yan Wang & Wei Chen, 2025. "Sustainable Transition Pathways for Steel Manufacturing: Low-Carbon Steelmaking Technologies in Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-37, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5329-:d:1675126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5329/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/12/5329/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julian Suer & Marzia Traverso & Nils Jäger, 2022. "Carbon Footprint Assessment of Hydrogen and Steel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-20, December.
    2. Boldrini, Annika & Koolen, Derck & Crijns-Graus, Wina & van den Broek, Machteld, 2024. "The impact of decarbonising the iron and steel industry on European power and hydrogen systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bożena Gajdzik & Radosław Wolniak & Wiesław Grebski, 2025. "An Econometric Analysis of CO 2 Emission Intensity in Poland’s Blast Furnace–Basic Oxygen Furnace Steelmaking Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-30, April.
    2. Neill Raath & Darren J. Hughes, 2025. "The Environmental Impact of Collecting and Processing Abandoned Shopping Trolleys in the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-25, March.
    3. Bożena Gajdzik & Radosław Wolniak & Anna Sączewska-Piotrowska & Wiesław Wes Grebski, 2025. "Polish Steel Production Under Conditions of Decarbonization—Steel Volume Forecasts Using Time Series and Multiple Linear Regression," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(7), pages 1-38, March.
    4. Raillard--Cazanove, Quentin & Rogeau, Antoine & Girard, Robin, 2025. "Decarbonisation modelling for key industrial sectors focusing on process changes in a cost-optimised pathway," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 382(C).
    5. Weiss, Robert & Ikäheimo, Jussi, 2024. "Flexible industrial power-to-X production enabling large-scale wind power integration: A case study of future hydrogen direct reduction iron production in Finland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    6. Béres, Rebeka & Nijs, Wouter & Boldrini, Annika & van den Broek, Machteld, 2024. "Will hydrogen and synthetic fuels energize our future? Their role in Europe's climate-neutral energy system and power system dynamics," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).
    7. Mengxuan Yan & Shen-En Peng & Chun Sing Lai & Si-Zhe Chen & Jing Liu & Junhua Xu & Fangyuan Xu & Loi Lei Lai & Gang Chen, 2023. "Two-Layer Optimization Planning Model for Integrated Energy Systems in Hydrogen Refueling Original Station," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-16, May.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:12:p:5329-:d:1675126. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.