IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p5133-d1671211.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Large-Scale Flood Risks: A Multi-Source Data Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mengyao Wang

    (College of Environmental and Disaster Governance, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Beijing 101601, China)

  • Hong Zhu

    (College of Environmental and Disaster Governance, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Beijing 101601, China)

  • Jiaqi Yao

    (Academy of Eco-Civilization Development for Jing-Jin-Ji Megalopolis, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300387, China)

  • Liuru Hu

    (College of Geomatics, Xi’an University of Science and Technology, Xi’an 710054, China
    Departamento de Ingeniería Civil, Escuela Politécnica Superior de Alicante, Universidad de Alicante, P.O. Box 99, E-03080 Alicante, Spain)

  • Haojie Kang

    (Faculty of Geomatics, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • An Qian

    (College of Environmental and Disaster Governance, Institute of Disaster Prevention, Beijing 101601, China)

Abstract

Flood hazards caused by intense short-term precipitation have led to significant social and economic losses and pose serious threats to human life and property. Accurate disaster risk assessment plays a critical role in verifying disaster statistics and supporting disaster recovery and reconstruction processes. In this study, a novel Large-Scale Flood Risk Assessment Model (LS-FRAM) is proposed, incorporating the dimensions of hazard, exposure, vulnerability, and coping capacity. Multi-source heterogeneous data are utilized for evaluating the flood risks. Soil erosion modeling is incorporated into the assessment framework to better understand the interactions between flood intensity and land surface degradation. An index system comprising 12 secondary indicators is constructed and screened using Pearson correlation analysis to minimize redundancy. Subsequently, the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is utilized to determine the weights of the primary-level indicators, while the entropy weight method, Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP), and an integrated weighting approach are combined to calculate the weights of the secondary-level indicators. This model addresses the complexity of large-scale flood risk assessment and management by incorporating multiple perspectives and leveraging diverse data sources. The experimental results demonstrate that the flood risk assessment model, utilizing multi-source data, achieves an overall accuracy of 88.49%. Specifically, the proportions of areas classified as high and very high flood risk are 54.11% in Henan, 31.74% in Shaanxi, and 18.2% in Shanxi. These results provide valuable scientific support for enhancing flood control, disaster relief capabilities, and risk management in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River. Furthermore, they can furnish the necessary data support for post-disaster reconstruction efforts in impacted areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Mengyao Wang & Hong Zhu & Jiaqi Yao & Liuru Hu & Haojie Kang & An Qian, 2025. "Assessing Large-Scale Flood Risks: A Multi-Source Data Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-25, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5133-:d:1671211
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5133/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/5133/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:5133-:d:1671211. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.