IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p4967-d1666698.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-Disaster Recovery Assessment Using Sentiment Analysis of English-Language Tweets: A Tenth-Anniversary Case Study of the 2010 Haiti Earthquake

Author

Listed:
  • Diana Contreras

    (School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK)

  • Dimosthenis Antypas

    (School of Computer Sciences;Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 4A, UK)

  • Javier Hervas

    (Independent Researcher, Cardiff CF10 2HS, UK)

  • Sean Wilkinson

    (School of Engineering; Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK)

  • Jose Camacho-Collados

    (School of Computer Sciences;Cardiff University, Cardiff CF24 4A, UK)

  • Philippe Garnier

    (AE&CC Research Unit, CRAterre Research Lab, École Nationale Supérieure d'Architecture de Grenoble, Université Grenoble Alpes, 12636 Grenoble, France)

  • Cécile Cornou

    (ISTerre, IRD, Université Grenoble Alpes, 38000 Grenoble, France)

Abstract

The 2010 Haiti earthquake stands as one of the most catastrophic events in terms of loss of life and destruction. Following an earthquake, there is an urgent demand for information. Regrettably, few studies have tracked the progress of the post-disaster recovery, leaving this phase poorly understood. In previous years, data were exclusively collected through on-site missions, but today, social media (SM) has enhanced earthquake reconnaissance teams’ capacity to collect data beyond the emergency phase. However, text data from SM is unstructured, making it necessary to use natural language processing techniques to extract meaningful information. Sentiment analysis (SA), which classifies people’s opinions into positive, negative, or neutral polarity, is a promising tool for understanding earthquake recovery. For the purposes of this paper, we conduct SA at the tweet level on data collected around the tenth anniversary of the earthquake using human expertise to fine-tune automatic classification methods. We conclude that the anniversary date is the best time to collect data. In our sample, 56.3% of the tweets in the sample were classified as negative, followed by positive (27.3%), neutral (8.2%), and unrelated (8.1%). In our study, we conclude that the assessment of the recovery progress based on data collected from Twitter is negative. The automatic method for SA with the highest accuracy is ‘btweet’. The assessment result must be validated by stakeholders.

Suggested Citation

  • Diana Contreras & Dimosthenis Antypas & Javier Hervas & Sean Wilkinson & Jose Camacho-Collados & Philippe Garnier & Cécile Cornou, 2025. "Post-Disaster Recovery Assessment Using Sentiment Analysis of English-Language Tweets: A Tenth-Anniversary Case Study of the 2010 Haiti Earthquake," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-32, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4967-:d:1666698
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4967/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4967/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4967-:d:1666698. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.