IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0302423.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of adjective and adverb types for effective Twitter sentiment classification

Author

Listed:
  • Syed Fahad Ali
  • Nayyer Masood

Abstract

Twitter, the largest microblogging platform, has reported more than 330 million active users in recent years. Many users express their sentiments about politics, sports, products, personalities, etc. Sentiment analysis has emerged as a specialized branch of machine learning in which tweets are binary-classified to provide sentimental insights. A major step in sentiment classification is feature selection, which primarily revolves around parts of speech (POS). Few techniques merely focused on single features such as adjectives, adverbs, and verbs, while other techniques examined types of these features, such as comparative adjectives, superlative adjectives, or general adverbs. Furthermore, POS as linguistic entities have also been studied and extensively classified by researchers, such as CLAWS-C7. For sentiment analysis, none of the studies conceptualized all possible POS features under similar conditions to draw firm conclusion. This research is centered on the following objectives: 1) examining the impact of various types of adjectives and adverbs that have not been previously explored for sentiment classification; 2) analyzing potential combinations of adjectives and adverbs types 3) conducting a comparison with a benchmark dataset for better classification accuracy. To assess the concept, a renowned human annotated dataset of tweets is investigated. Results showed that classification accuracy for adjectives is improved up to 83% based on the general superlative adjective whereas for adverbs, comparative general adverb also depicted significant accuracy improvement. Their combination with general adjectives and general adverbs also played a substantial role. The unexplored potential of adjectives and adverb types proved better in accuracy against state-of-the-art probabilistic model. In comparison to lexicon-based model, proposed research model overruled the dependency of lexicon-based dictionary where each term first needs to be matched for semantic orientation. The evident outcomes also help in time reduction aspect where huge volume of data need to be processed swiftly. This noteworthy contribution brought up significant knowledge and direction for domain experts. In the future, the proposed technique will be explored for other types of textual data across different domains.

Suggested Citation

  • Syed Fahad Ali & Nayyer Masood, 2024. "Evaluation of adjective and adverb types for effective Twitter sentiment classification," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0302423
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0302423
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0302423&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0302423?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fatma Najar & Nizar Bouguila, 2023. "On smoothing and scaling language model for sentiment based information retrieval," Advances in Data Analysis and Classification, Springer;German Classification Society - Gesellschaft für Klassifikation (GfKl);Japanese Classification Society (JCS);Classification and Data Analysis Group of the Italian Statistical Society (CLADAG);International Federation of Classification Societies (IFCS), vol. 17(3), pages 725-744, September.
    2. Ragini, J. Rexiline & Anand, P.M. Rubesh & Bhaskar, Vidhyacharan, 2018. "Big data analytics for disaster response and recovery through sentiment analysis," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 13-24.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. de Camargo Fiorini, Paula & Roman Pais Seles, Bruno Michel & Chiappetta Jabbour, Charbel Jose & Barberio Mariano, Enzo & de Sousa Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes, 2018. "Management theory and big data literature: From a review to a research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 112-129.
    2. Carlos Carrasco-Farré, 2022. "The fingerprints of misinformation: how deceptive content differs from reliable sources in terms of cognitive effort and appeal to emotions," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-18, December.
    3. Acharya, Abhilash & Singh, Sanjay Kumar & Pereira, Vijay & Singh, Poonam, 2018. "Big data, knowledge co-creation and decision making in fashion industry," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 90-101.
    4. Umar Ali Bukar & Fatimah Sidi & Marzanah A. Jabar & Rozi Nor Haizan Nor & Salfarina Abdullah & Iskandar Ishak & Mustafa Alabadla & Ali Alkhalifah, 2022. "How Advanced Technological Approaches Are Reshaping Sustainable Social Media Crisis Management and Communication: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-26, May.
    5. Muhammad Ashraf Fauzi, 2023. "Social media in disaster management: review of the literature and future trends through bibliometric analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(2), pages 953-975, September.
    6. Ni, Zi-jian & Rong, Lili & Wang, Ning & Cao, Shuo, 2019. "Knowledge model for emergency response based on contingency planning system of China," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 10-22.
    7. Abhinav Kumar & Jyoti Prakash Singh & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Nripendra P. Rana, 2022. "A deep multi-modal neural network for informative Twitter content classification during emergencies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 791-822, December.
    8. Turgut Acikara & Bo Xia & Tan Yigitcanlar & Carol Hon, 2023. "Contribution of Social Media Analytics to Disaster Response Effectiveness: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-50, May.
    9. Abhilash Kondraganti & Gopalakrishnan Narayanamurthy & Hossein Sharifi, 2024. "A systematic literature review on the use of big data analytics in humanitarian and disaster operations," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 335(3), pages 1015-1052, April.
    10. Harri Raisio & Alisa Puustinen & Juha Lindell, 2022. "#StrongTogether? Qualitative Sentiment Analysis of Social Media Reactions to Disaster Volunteering during a Forest Fire in Finland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Guo, Yuanyuan & Chen, Yilang & Wu, Liang & Li, Longzhen & Li, Ruoxi, 2025. "How ecosystems coordinate architectures and AI in humanitarian operations? A configurational view," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    12. Gupta, Shivam & Kar, Arpan Kumar & Baabdullah, Abdullah & Al-Khowaiter, Wassan A.A., 2018. "Big data with cognitive computing: A review for the future," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 78-89.
    13. Pablo M. Flores & Martin Hilbert, 2023. "Temporal communication dynamics in the aftermath of large-scale upheavals: do digital footprints reveal a stage model?," Journal of Computational Social Science, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 973-999, October.
    14. Bo Yang & Yue Hu & Xusen Cheng & Ying Bao & Wenjing Chen, 2023. "Exploring the factors affecting content dissemination through WeChat official accounts: a heuristic-systematic model perspective," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 2713-2735, December.
    15. Paras Bhatt & Naga Vemprala & Rohit Valecha & Govind Hariharan & H. Raghav Rao, 2023. "User Privacy, Surveillance and Public Health during COVID-19 – An Examination of Twitterverse," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 1667-1682, October.
    16. Siqing Shan & Xijie Ju & Yigang Wei & Xin Wen, 2022. "Concerned or Apathetic? Using Social Media Platform (Twitter) to Gauge the Public Awareness about Wildlife Conservation: A Case Study of the Illegal Rhino Trade," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-21, June.
    17. Cheng-Chun Lee & Mikel Maron & Ali Mostafavi, 2022. "Community-scale big data reveals disparate impacts of the Texas winter storm of 2021 and its managed power outage," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-12, December.
    18. Vimala Balakrishnan & Zhongliang Shi & Chuan Liang Law & Regine Lim & Lee Leng Teh & Yue Fan & Jeyarani Periasamy, 2022. "A Comprehensive Analysis of Transformer-Deep Neural Network Models in Twitter Disaster Detection," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(24), pages 1-14, December.
    19. Sachin Modgil & Rohit Kumar Singh & Cyril Foropon, 2022. "Quality management in humanitarian operations and disaster relief management: a review and future research directions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 1045-1098, December.
    20. Elbanna, Amany & Bunker, Deborah & Levine, Linda & Sleigh, Anthony, 2019. "Emergency management in the changing world of social media: Framing the research agenda with the stakeholders through engaged scholarship," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 112-120.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0302423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.