IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i11p4828-d1663241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing Supply and Demand Discrepancies of Urban Green Space in High-Density Built-Up Areas Based on Vitality Impacts: Evidence from Beijing’s Central Districts, China

Author

Listed:
  • Jingyi Han

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Shoubang Huang

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Shiyang Zhang

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Qing Lin

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

  • Xiangrong Wang

    (School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China)

Abstract

In rapidly urbanizing areas, there is a notable aggregation of vitality in high-density urban environments, accompanied by an increasing discrepancy between the supply and demand of urban green space (UGS). This study presented an integrated framework comprising a model for UGS supply-demand coupling coordination and a measure of urban vitality. Using downtown Beijing as a case study, the Gini coefficient assessed UGS supply-demand disparities across different vitality types. The study examined how UGS supply and demand factors interact with urban vitality, revealing the impact of UGS supply-demand imbalances on various dimensions of vitality and the UGS mismatches experienced by different vitality groups. The study showed that: (1) 63.29% of central Beijing’s areas had low UGS supply-demand coordination, with 39.23% experiencing UGS mismatches; (2) UGS supply and demand were significantly correlated with urban vitality spatial distribution; (3) these factors significantly impacted urban comprehensive vitality; (4) and there were notable UGS distribution disparities among vitality groups, with economic vitality group perceiving the greatest inequity (Gini = 0.311), followed by social vitality (Gini = 0.289) and cultural vitality group (Gini = 0.247). These findings offer valuable insights for a more refined assessment and enhancement of UGS, aiming to achieve balanced, high-quality, and sustainable urban development.

Suggested Citation

  • Jingyi Han & Shoubang Huang & Shiyang Zhang & Qing Lin & Xiangrong Wang, 2025. "Assessing Supply and Demand Discrepancies of Urban Green Space in High-Density Built-Up Areas Based on Vitality Impacts: Evidence from Beijing’s Central Districts, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-31, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4828-:d:1663241
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4828/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/11/4828/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:11:p:4828-:d:1663241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.