IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4744-d1661247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the Sustainability of Construction Companies in the Digital Context: An Econometric Approach Based on Financial, Social, and Environmental Indicators

Author

Listed:
  • Lucia Morosan-Danila

    (Faculty of Economics, Administration and Business, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, 720229 Suceava, Romania)

  • Claudia-Elena Grigoras-Ichim

    (Faculty of Economics, Administration and Business, Stefan cel Mare University of Suceava, 720229 Suceava, Romania)

  • Florin Victor Jeflea

    (Faculty of Economic Sciences, Ovidius University of Constanta, 900527 Constanta, Romania)

  • Dumitru Filipeanu

    (Faculty of Constructions and Installations, Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi, 700050 Iasi, Romania)

  • Alexandru Tugui

    (Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi, 700506 Iasi, Romania)

Abstract

The increasing pressure for transparency in corporate sustainability reporting, especially under frameworks such as the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive and the European Sustainability Reporting Standards, has raised the need for sector-specific models to integrate financial, social, and environmental indicators coherently and measurably. This study proposes a composite econometric model to assess the sustainability performance of companies in the construction sector in a digital context, a domain that remains underexplored despite its substantial economic and environmental impact. Drawing on a sample of 1600 Romanian construction companies over ten years (2013–2023), this study develops a multidimensional sustainability score and tests its financial drivers using ordinary least squares regression models. The model incorporates nine financial structure variables as predictors of sustainability outcomes across three dimensions—financial, social, and environmental—while ensuring robustness through heteroscedasticity and multicollinearity diagnostics. The results show that indicators such as the return on assets, debt ratio, and equity structure significantly influence sustainability performance, particularly in the financial and environmental dimensions. In contrast, the social dimension exhibits lower explanatory power. The findings suggest that financial resilience plays a critical role in shaping sustainable practices in the construction industry and support the adoption of integrated models for performance benchmarking and policy alignment.

Suggested Citation

  • Lucia Morosan-Danila & Claudia-Elena Grigoras-Ichim & Florin Victor Jeflea & Dumitru Filipeanu & Alexandru Tugui, 2025. "Assessing the Sustainability of Construction Companies in the Digital Context: An Econometric Approach Based on Financial, Social, and Environmental Indicators," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-26, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4744-:d:1661247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4744/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4744/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katarzyna Chudy-Laskowska & Sabina Rokita, 2024. "Profitability of Energy Sector Companies in Poland: Do Internal Factors Matter?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-28, October.
    2. León-Bravo, Verónica & Caniato, Federico, 2024. "Sustainability performance measurement in the food supply chain: Trade-offs, institutional pressures, and contextual factors," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 633-646.
    3. Henri, Jean-Francois, 2006. "Management control systems and strategy: A resource-based perspective," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(6), pages 529-558, August.
    4. Michael Kühnen & Samanthi Silva & Rüdiger Hahn, 2022. "From negative to positive sustainability performance measurement and assessment? A qualitative inquiry drawing on framing effects theory," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 1985-2001, July.
    5. Sujit Singh & Ezutah Udoncy Olugu & Siti Nurmaya Musa & Abu Bakar Mahat, 2018. "Fuzzy-based sustainability evaluation method for manufacturing SMEs using balanced scorecard framework," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Ioan Batrancea & Ioan-Dan Morar & Ema Masca & Sabau Catalin & Liviu Bechis, 2018. "Econometric Modeling of SME Performance. Case of Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Utz Schäffer & Matthias D. Mahlendorf & Jochen Rehring, 2014. "Does the Interactive Use of Headquarter Performance Measurement Systems in Foreign Subsidiaries Endanger the Potential to Profit from Local Relationships?," Australian Accounting Review, CPA Australia, vol. 24(1), pages 21-38, March.
    2. Anja Heinicke, 2018. "Performance measurement systems in small and medium-sized enterprises and family firms: a systematic literature review," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 28(4), pages 457-502, February.
    3. Hall, Matthew, 2010. "Accounting information and managerial work," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 28539, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    4. Nuraddeen Abubakar Nuhu & Kevin Baird & Sophia Su, 2022. "The association between the interactive and diagnostic use of financial and non-financial performance measures with individual creativity: The mediating role of perceived fairness," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 33(3), pages 371-402, September.
    5. Lepori, Benedetto & Montauti, Martina, 2020. "Bringing the organization back in: Flexing structural responses to competing logics in budgeting," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    6. Chen, Clara Xiaoling & Lill, Jeremy B. & Lucianetti, Lorenzo, 2023. "Performance measurement system diversity and product innovation: Evidence from longitudinal survey data," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    7. Abdessamad Dibi & Hamid Amifi, 2023. "Hidden cost-performance control, an innovative managerial practice for more resilient organizations [Le contrôle de gestion des coûts-performance cachés, une pratique managériale innovante pour des," Post-Print hal-04569445, HAL.
    8. Christophe Herriau & Lionel Touchais, 2012. "Changement et système de contrôle : une perspective dynamique," Post-Print hal-01737425, HAL.
    9. James T. Mackey & F. Johnny Deng, 2016. "Examining the Role of Management Control Systems in the Creation of an Innovative Culture," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 13(03), pages 1-27, June.
    10. Christina Boedker & Kar Ming Chong, 2022. "The mediating role of accounting controls between supervisors' empowering leadership style and subordinates' creativity and goal productivity," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 62(4), pages 4587-4614, December.
    11. Walid Cheffi, 2008. "Etude Des Roles De La Comptabilite De Gestion Pour Les Managers : Le Cas D'Un Grand Groupe Automobile," Post-Print halshs-00522472, HAL.
    12. Yaffa Moskovich, 2018. "Belief systems and business strategy in a privatized kibbutz factory," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 29(1), pages 5-36, March.
    13. Gérald Naro & Denis Travaillé, 2010. "Construire les stratégies avec le Balanced Scorecard:vers une approche interactive du modèle de Kaplan et Norton," Revue Finance Contrôle Stratégie, revues.org, vol. 13(2), pages 33-66., June.
    14. Szutowski Dawid, 2019. "Management Control Systems and Innovation Process Efficiency. A Conceptual Model," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 19(2), pages 160-175, December.
    15. repec:dau:papers:123456789/10751 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Ranjith Appuhami & Faruk Bhuiyan & Christina Boedker, 2024. "Navigating frugality and creativity urgencies: the role of diagnostic use of budgets and goal clarity," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 35(2), pages 235-264, June.
    17. Tiina Henttu-Aho, 2018. "The role of rolling forecasting in budgetary control systems: reactive and proactive types of planning," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 29(3), pages 327-360, December.
    18. Erli Dan & Jianfei Shen & Xinyuan Zheng & Peng Liu & Ludan Zhang & Feiyu Chen, 2023. "Asset Structure, Asset Utilization Efficiency, and Carbon Emission Performance: Evidence from Panel Data of China’s Low-Carbon Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-20, April.
    19. Ismail Benslimane & Sanae Benjelloun, 2025. "Re-writing management control philosophy," Post-Print hal-04912311, HAL.
    20. Kevin Hermanto Tupamahu & Imam Ghozali & P.T. Basuki, 2019. "Lean Management, Competitive Advantage, and Firm Performance: The Role of Management Control Systems (Evidence from Indonesia Manufacturing Firms)," Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, Richtmann Publishing Ltd, vol. 8, November.
    21. Hofmann, Thorsten, 2011. "Balanced Scorecard: Theoretische Konzeption und Anwendung in der Praxis," Research Papers on Marketing Strategy 4/2011, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Lehrstuhl für BWL und Marketing.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4744-:d:1661247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.