Author
Listed:
- Abdulaziz Alharbi
(Department of Environment and Natural Resources, College of Agriculture and Food, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia)
- Mohamed Ghonimy
(Department of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, College of Agriculture and Food, Qassim University, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia)
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the environmental benefits of utilizing by-products from olive farms and olive oil mills within the framework of sustainable resource management and the reduction in agricultural waste, through an integrated circular approach that involves composting and bioenergy recovery. A total of 10.7–11.2 t/ha of biomass, including pruning residues and olive pomace, was generated, with a utilization efficiency of 63.5–67.5%. The energy potential of olive biomass was highlighted through assessments that revealed a theoretical generation potential of approximately 96 GJ/ha (25–28 MW·h/ha), primarily from repurposed woody biomass and pomace. The environmental analysis showed a 50–60% reduction in greenhouse gas emissions compared to conventional disposal, due to avoided open burning, carbon stabilization via compost, and the displacement of fossil fuels. Economically, the circular strategy yielded a net benefit of ~70 $/ha, with revenues from bioenergy and compost exceeding processing costs. Soil organic matter increased from 1.3% to 1.5% after compost application, improving fertility and water retention. The waste reduction percentage reached ~65%, significantly decreasing the volume of unutilized biomass. These outcomes, confirmed through statistical and correlation analyses, demonstrate a robust model for circular agriculture that enhances energy self-sufficiency, mitigates the environmental impact, and supports economic and agronomic sustainability. The findings offer a replicable framework for transforming olive farming waste into valuable bioresources.
Suggested Citation
Abdulaziz Alharbi & Mohamed Ghonimy, 2025.
"Environmental Benefits of Olive By-Products in Energy, Soil, and Sustainable Management,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-21, May.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4722-:d:1660626
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4722-:d:1660626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.