IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i10p4653-d1659097.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Impact of Social Capital and Community Empowerment on Regional Revitalization Practices: A Case Study on the Practice of University Social Responsibility Programs in Wanli and Jinshan Districts

Author

Listed:
  • Hung-Chieh Chen

    (College of General Education, Chihlee University of Technology, New Taipei City 220305, Taiwan)

  • Tzu-Chao Lin

    (College of General Education, Chihlee University of Technology, New Taipei City 220305, Taiwan)

  • Ying-Hui Chen

    (College of General Education, Chihlee University of Technology, New Taipei City 220305, Taiwan)

Abstract

Amid accelerating globalization and urbanization, regional revitalization has become a key policy direction for countries to address regional decline. Among these, social capital and community empowerment can significantly promote regional development. Social capital emphasizes how trust, norms, and reciprocity facilitate collective action, while community empowerment focuses on improving residents’ participation and autonomous decision-making capacity. Existing research primarily focuses on cases from Europe and America; there is no in-depth exploration of the interaction between regional revitalization and social capital in Taiwan. Notably, systematic studies are lacking regarding the mechanisms through which University Social Responsibility (USR) programs engage and promote community development. This study takes the Wanli and Jinshan districts in northern Taiwan as case study examples. We employ action research and qualitative research methods to analyze the role of social capital and community empowerment in regional revitalization. This paper reviews how internal trust and cooperation within a community build bonding social capital. It explores how USR programs promote collaboration between communities and external resources through bridging social capital. The findings indicate that bonding social capital can enhance community cohesion and support regional revitalization efforts; bridging social capital can introduce academic, corporate, and governmental resources, providing technical and financial support for community innovation. The participatory mechanism of USR programs not only fosters civic awareness development but also offers a cross-organizational cooperation platform for regional revitalization, enabling communities to integrate internal and external resources more effectively. The results of this study indicate that bonding and bridging social capital can achieve complementary effects through USR programs, further promoting community empowerment and regional development. This study deepens the application of social capital theory in regional revitalization. It provides an empirical basis for policymakers and academic institutions to optimize the planning and implementation of future USR programs. While the study focuses on a geographically bounded set of cases and employs an exploratory qualitative design, these choices enabled a rich, context-sensitive understanding of how regional self-governance and community capital may be strengthened in practice. Future research could extend this line of inquiry by examining additional locales, adopting longitudinal perspectives, and integrating mixed-method approaches, thereby further amplifying the robustness and applicability of the propositions advanced here.

Suggested Citation

  • Hung-Chieh Chen & Tzu-Chao Lin & Ying-Hui Chen, 2025. "The Impact of Social Capital and Community Empowerment on Regional Revitalization Practices: A Case Study on the Practice of University Social Responsibility Programs in Wanli and Jinshan Districts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-35, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4653-:d:1659097
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4653/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/10/4653/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Anna Grignani & Michela Gozzellino & Alessandro Sciullo & Dario Padovan, 2021. "Community Cooperative: A New Legal Form for Enhancing Social Capital for the Development of Renewable Energy Communities in Italy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bianchi, F.R. & Bosio, B. & Conte, F. & Massucco, S. & Mosaico, G. & Natrella, G. & Saviozzi, M., 2023. "Modelling and optimal management of renewable energy communities using reversible solid oxide cells," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    2. Monica Musolino & Domenica Farinella, 2025. "Renewable Energy Communities as Examples of Civic and Citizen-Led Practices: A Comparative Analysis from Italy," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-29, March.
    3. Musolino, Monica & Maggio, Gaetano & D'Aleo, Erika & Nicita, Agatino, 2023. "Three case studies to explore relevant features of emerging renewable energy communities in Italy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 540-555.
    4. Osman Arrobbio & Dario Padovan & Alessandro Sciullo, 2022. "Collective Action Initiatives as a Tool for a Peaceful Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-4, April.
    5. Natalia Magnani & Valentina-Miriam Cittati, 2022. "Combining the Multilevel Perspective and Socio-Technical Imaginaries in the Study of Community Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, February.
    6. Andrea Sarcina & Rubina Canesi, 2023. "Renewable Energy Community: Opportunities and Threats towards Green Transition," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Remigijus Civinskas & Rimantas Stašys & Asta Pancerovienė & Aušra Anužienė, 2023. "Social Cooperative Model Choices in the Socially Unsustainable Environment: Evidence from Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Luisa Losada-Puente & José Antonio Blanco & Adina Dumitru & Ioannis Sebos & Aggelos Tsakanikas & Ioanna Liosi & Stelios Psomas & Mariangela Merrone & Diego Quiñoy & Eduardo Rodríguez, 2023. "Cross-Case Analysis of the Energy Communities in Spain, Italy, and Greece: Progress, Barriers, and the Road Ahead," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.
    9. Giulia Taromboli & Laura Campagna & Cristina Bergonzi & Filippo Bovera & Vincenzo Trovato & Marco Merlo & Giuliano Rancilio, 2025. "Renewable Energy Communities: Frameworks and Implementation of Regulatory, Technical, and Social Aspects Across EU Member States," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-32, May.
    10. Roberta Roberto & Gabriella Ferruzzi & Viviana Negro & Michel Noussan, 2023. "Mapping of Energy Community Development in Europe: State of the Art and Research Directions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-29, September.
    11. Anita Tatti & Sibilla Ferroni & Martina Ferrando & Mario Motta & Francesco Causone, 2023. "The Emerging Trends of Renewable Energy Communities’ Development in Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    12. Michael Krug & Maria Rosaria Di Nucci & Matteo Caldera & Elena De Luca, 2022. "Mainstreaming Community Energy: Is the Renewable Energy Directive a Driver for Renewable Energy Communities in Germany and Italy?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-24, June.
    13. Michael Krug & Maria Rosaria Di Nucci & Lucas Schwarz & Irene Alonso & Isabel Azevedo & Massimo Bastiani & Anna Dyląg & Erik Laes & Arthur Hinsch & Gaidis Klāvs & Ivars Kudreņickis & Pouyan Maleki & G, 2023. "Implementing European Union Provisions and Enabling Frameworks for Renewable Energy Communities in Nine Countries: Progress, Delays, and Gaps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-29, May.
    14. Roberto De Lotto & Calogero Micciché & Elisabetta M. Venco & Angelo Bonaiti & Riccardo De Napoli, 2022. "Energy Communities: Technical, Legislative, Organizational, and Planning Features," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:10:p:4653-:d:1659097. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.