IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i9p3513-d1380825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effectiveness of Educational Interventions in Improving Waste Management Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Alessio Conti

    (Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy)

  • Elena Viottini

    (Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
    Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome “Tor Vergata”, 00133 Rome, Italy)

  • Rosanna Irene Comoretto

    (Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy)

  • Chiara Piovan

    (Department of Orthopedics and Functional Rehabilitation, Città della Salute e della Scienza University Hospital of Torino, 10126 Torino, Italy)

  • Barbara Martin

    (Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy)

  • Beatrice Albanesi

    (Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy)

  • Marco Clari

    (Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy)

  • Valerio Dimonte

    (Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

  • Sara Campagna

    (Department of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy
    These authors contributed equally to this work.)

Abstract

The healthcare sector represents a major source of waste production, and healthcare workers (HCWs) are crucial in waste management. Educational interventions (EIs) can be delivered through a single component (mono-component) or by combining different components (multi-component); although they have a potential impact on the sustainability of healthcare, their effectiveness in waste management still needs to be identified. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to describe EIs to improve waste management knowledge, attitudes, and practices among HCWs and provide an estimate of their effectiveness. Six relevant databases were searched; 24 articles were included, and 19 were meta-analyzed. These were mainly from low-income countries and did not consider EIs for recycling, reducing, and reusing. Compared to the mono-component EIs, the multi-component Eis showed a higher statistically significant positive post-intervention effect on knowledge, with greater retention in the medium–long term, and on practices, particularly among non-hands-on HCWs. The effects of the EIs on attitudes were not significant. Our results suggest that multi-component EIs should be preferred to improve waste management standards in the healthcare sector. Given the heterogeneity found among EIs, the standardization of types, content, duration, and assessment methods should be considered. Finally, their harmonization at a global level could influence international and national policies on sustainability.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessio Conti & Elena Viottini & Rosanna Irene Comoretto & Chiara Piovan & Barbara Martin & Beatrice Albanesi & Marco Clari & Valerio Dimonte & Sara Campagna, 2024. "The Effectiveness of Educational Interventions in Improving Waste Management Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among Healthcare Workers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-22, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3513-:d:1380825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3513/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/9/3513/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:9:p:3513-:d:1380825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.