IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i7p2866-d1366558.html

Biophilic Experience in High-Rise Residential Areas in China: Factor Structure and Validity of a Scale

Author

Listed:
  • Miao Yue

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China
    Department of Architecture and Art, Zhejiang College of Construction, Hangzhou 311231, China)

  • Xinshuo Zhang

    (College of Design and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 999002, Singapore)

  • Junjie Zhang

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Shandong Jianzhu University, Jinan 250101, China)

Abstract

The increasing popularity of high-rise, high-density residential areas in urban environments has brought about problems such as isolation from nature and increasingly depauperate ecological conditions, and consequently, adverse effects on residents’ health and environmental sustainability. Therefore, creating a high-quality biophilic living space environment is key to solving this conflict, considering the health benefits that nature brings to people. However, there are currently no appropriate assessment tools to measure the biophilic living environment of high-rise residential areas. In response, we have developed an environment assessment scale for measuring the Biophilic Experience in High-Rise Residential Areas (BornA) based on resident experiences. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to identify the measurement items relevant to their biophilic living experiences and behaviors. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were performed to identify the scale’s structure and examine its reliability and validity. The study resulted in the development of an 18-item BornA, comprising five dimensions: natural landscape, natural interaction, cultural identity, neighborhood interaction, and personal space. The BornA contributes to the assessment of the biophilic living space environment in high-rise residential areas from the perspective of resident behavior and perception, identifying health intervention environments for sample populations and understanding how the residential environment affects residents’ health.

Suggested Citation

  • Miao Yue & Xinshuo Zhang & Junjie Zhang, 2024. "Biophilic Experience in High-Rise Residential Areas in China: Factor Structure and Validity of a Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-19, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2866-:d:1366558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2866/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/7/2866/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kwan, Mei-Po, 2009. "From place-based to people-based exposure measures," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 69(9), pages 1311-1313, November.
    2. Pei Yi Lim & Denise Dillon & Peter K. H. Chew, 2020. "A Guide to Nature Immersion: Psychological and Physiological Benefits," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-26, August.
    3. Ahmed Tarek Zaky Fouad & Danielle Sinnett & Isabelle Bray & Rachael McClatchey & Rebecca Reece, 2023. "Measures of Greenspace Exposure and Their Association to Health-Related Outcomes for the Periods before and during the 2020 Lockdown: A Cross-Sectional Study in the West of England," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, March.
    4. Nicole V. DeVille & Linda Powers Tomasso & Olivia P. Stoddard & Grete E. Wilt & Teresa H. Horton & Kathleen L. Wolf & Eric Brymer & Peter H. Kahn & Peter James, 2021. "Time Spent in Nature Is Associated with Increased Pro-Environmental Attitudes and Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Eun Ji Lee & Sung Jun Park, 2021. "Toward the Biophilic Residential Regeneration for the Green New Deal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, March.
    6. Rob Bailey & Stephen Ball, 2006. "An exploration of the meanings of hotel brand equity," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(1), pages 15-38, January.
    7. Eun-Ji Lee & Sung-Jun Park, 2022. "Biophilic Experience-Based Residential Hybrid Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-25, July.
    8. Sarah P. Church, 2018. "From street trees to natural areas: retrofitting cities for human connectedness to nature," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(5-6), pages 878-903, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eun-Ji Lee & Sung-Jun Park, 2025. "Generative AI for Biophilic Design in Historic Urban Alleys: Balancing Place Identity and Biophilic Strategies in Urban Regeneration," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-29, October.
    2. Li, Jingjing & Kim, Changjoo & Sang, Sunhee, 2018. "Exploring impacts of land use characteristics in residential neighborhood and activity space on non-work travel behaviors," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 141-147.
    3. Carlos Monteiro & Mara Franco & Raquel Meneses & Rui Alexandre Castanho, 2023. "Customer Co-Creation on Revisiting Intentions: A Focus on the Tourism Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-22, October.
    4. Shearer, Cindy & Rainham, Daniel & Blanchard, Chris & Dummer, Trevor & Lyons, Renee & Kirk, Sara, 2015. "Measuring food availability and accessibility among adolescents: Moving beyond the neighbourhood boundary," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 322-330.
    5. Abdullah Uslu & Gözde Seval Ergün, 2021. "The Moderator Effect of the Perception of Value Co-Creation on the Relationship between Hotel Brand Equity and WOM," Academica Turistica - Tourism and Innovation Journal, University of Primorska Press, vol. 14(2), pages 149-164.
    6. Neutens, Tijs, 2015. "Accessibility, equity and health care: review and research directions for transport geographers," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 14-27.
    7. Laura Pasca, 2022. "Pride and guilt as mediators in the relationship between connection to nature and pro-environmental intention," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 175(1), pages 1-15, November.
    8. Mao, Liang & Stacciarini, Jeanne-Marie R. & Smith, Rebekah & Wiens, Brenda, 2015. "An individual-based rurality measure and its health application: A case study of Latino immigrants in North Florida, USA," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 300-308.
    9. David Wong & Shih-Lung Shaw, 2011. "Measuring segregation: an activity space approach," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 13(2), pages 127-145, June.
    10. Liu, Matthew Tingchi & Wong, IpKin Anthony & Tseng, Ting-Hsiang & Chang, Angela Wen-Yu & Phau, Ian, 2017. "Applying consumer-based brand equity in luxury hotel branding," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 192-202.
    11. Carly E. Gray & Peter H. Kahn & Joshua J. Lawler & Pooja S. Tandon & Gregory N. Bratman & Sara P. Perrins & Yian Lin & Frances Boyens, 2023. "Time Spent Interacting with Nature Is Associated with Greater Well-Being for Girl Scouts Before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Başak Aytatlı & Selcan Bayram & Semiha İsmailoğlu, 2025. "Deepening Layers of Urban Space: A Scenario-Based Approach with Artificial Intelligence for the Effective and Sustainable Use of Underground Parking Structures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-31, October.
    13. Zhang, Zhengyong & Cui, Wanjing & Deng, Xiaoxiao, 2025. "Can executive green experience improve enterprise total factor productivity? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    14. Tunstall, Helena & Shortt, Niamh K. & Niedzwiedz, Claire L. & Richardson, Elizabeth A. & Mitchell, Richard J. & Pearce, Jamie R., 2018. "Tobacco outlet density and tobacco knowledge, beliefs, purchasing behaviours and price among adolescents in Scotland," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 1-13.
    15. Agnieszka Wojewódzka-Wiewiórska & Gintarė Vaznonienė & Bernardas Vaznonis, 2022. "Who Cares for Nature in Rural Areas? Exploration of Relationships between People’s Socio-Economic Characteristics and the Perception of Nature as a Value in Poland and Lithuania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    16. Nicolo P Pinchak & Christopher R Browning & Catherine A Calder & Bethany Boettner, 2021. "Activity locations, residential segregation and the significance of residential neighbourhood boundary perceptions," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 58(13), pages 2758-2781, October.
    17. Farber, Steven & O'Kelly, Morton & Miller, Harvey J. & Neutens, Tijs, 2015. "Measuring segregation using patterns of daily travel behavior: A social interaction based model of exposure," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 26-38.
    18. Majid Esmaeilpour & Zahra Mohamadi & Azade Rajabi, 2016. "Effect Of Dimensions Of Service Quality On The Brand Equity In The Fast Food Industry," Romanian Economic Business Review, Romanian-American University, vol. 11(3), pages 68-83, September.
    19. Shen, Yao, 2019. "Segregation through space: A scope of the flow-based spatial interaction model," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 10-23.
    20. Ray, Arghya & Bala, Pradip Kumar & Chakraborty, Shibashish & Dasgupta, Shilpee A., 2021. "Exploring the impact of different factors on brand equity and intention to take up online courses from e-Learning platforms," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:7:p:2866-:d:1366558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.