IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i5p1729-d1342090.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Carbon Emissions Reduction of a Circular Architectural Practice: A Study on a Reversible Design Pavilion Using Recycled Materials

Author

Listed:
  • Hui Zhu

    (Department of Architecture, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan
    School of Architecture and Allied Arts, Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts, 257 Changgang Donglu, Haizhu District, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Shuenn-Ren Liou

    (Department of Architecture, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan)

  • Pi-Cheng Chen

    (Department of Environmental Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan)

  • Xia-Yun He

    (School of Architecture and Allied Arts, Guangzhou Academy of Fine Arts, 257 Changgang Donglu, Haizhu District, Guangzhou 510006, China)

  • Meng-Lin Sui

    (Department of Art and Design, The Hang Seng University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong)

Abstract

The construction industry, as a major consumer of resources and energy, accounts for about 40% of global carbon emissions. The concept of a circular economy (CE) is one effective means to address this issue. The entire lifecycle of a building includes: material production, construction, operation, and demolition. The production of building materials emits the largest proportion of carbon dioxide, followed by the operational phase, while construction (including demolition) has the smallest proportion. However, it is crucial to note the waste phase after demolition, where building materials are typically disposed of through incineration or landfill, leading to significant carbon emissions and environmental degradation. Therefore, carbon emissions generated during both the production and waste phases of the construction industry cannot be overlooked. This article employs a combined approach of practice and research, using the Circular Pavilion as a case study. From the design stage, reducing resource usage and carbon emissions are considered crucial factors. Reversible design, modularity, and the use of recycled materials are employed to reduce the emissions of “embodied carbon” and enhance material reuse. To validate the effectiveness of recycled materials in reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, this study calculates the material usage and carbon emissions during the production, transportation, and waste phases of the Circular Pavilion, Concrete Pavilion, and Steel Pavilion. The Circular Pavilion accounts for 34% and 3.5% of the total carbon emissions of the Concrete Pavilion and Steel Pavilion, respectively. In conclusion, the practical implementation of reversible design and recycled materials based on the concept of a circular economy is key to transitioning the construction industry from environmentally harmful impacts to eco-friendly practices. This establishes an effective method for resource reuse and carbon dioxide reduction in the construction sector, allowing waste resources to re-enter production and manufacturing processes, thereby reducing natural extraction, waste disposal, and energy consumption. Future applications of this method in the construction field involve establishing multidimensional composite design models and conducting feasibility assessments with upstream and downstream supply chains to support the realization of circular cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Hui Zhu & Shuenn-Ren Liou & Pi-Cheng Chen & Xia-Yun He & Meng-Lin Sui, 2024. "Carbon Emissions Reduction of a Circular Architectural Practice: A Study on a Reversible Design Pavilion Using Recycled Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-18, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1729-:d:1342090
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1729/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/5/1729/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xue, Jingyan & Liu, Gengyuan & Casazza, Marco & Ulgiati, Sergio, 2018. "Development of an urban FEW nexus online analyzer to support urban circular economy strategy planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 475-495.
    2. Magdalena Celadyn, 2020. "Integrative Design Classes for Environmental Sustainability of Interior Architectural Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Roberta Melella & Giacomo Di Ruocco & Alfonso Sorvillo, 2021. "Circular Construction Process: Method for Developing a Selective, Low CO 2eq Disassembly and Demolition Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-34, August.
    4. Fabio Nardecchia & Laura Pompei & Edoardo Egidi & Riccardo Faneschi & Giuseppe Piras, 2023. "Exergoeconomic and Environmental Evaluation of a Ground Source Heat Pump System for Reducing the Fossil Fuel Dependence: A Case Study in Rome," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-16, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiawei Wu & Xunrong Ye & Huachun Cui, 2025. "Recycled Materials in Construction: Trends, Status, and Future of Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-38, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chuhan Chen & Syarmila Hany Haron, 2023. "The Influence of Multistakeholder Value Cognition and Risk Attitudes on Sustainable Interior Landscape Design Decisions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Meng, Fanxin & Wang, Dongfang & Meng, Xiaoyan & Li, Hui & Liu, Gengyuan & Yuan, Qiuling & Hu, Yuanchao & Zhang, Yi, 2022. "Mapping urban energy–water–land nexus within a multiscale economy: A case study of four megacities in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    3. Mojtaba Ashour & Amir Mahdiyar & Syarmila Hany Haron, 2021. "A Comprehensive Review of Deterrents to the Practice of Sustainable Interior Architecture and Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-19, September.
    4. Gláucya Daú & Annibal Scavarda & Luiz Felipe Scavarda & Vivianne Julianelli Taveira Portugal, 2019. "The Healthcare Sustainable Supply Chain 4.0: The Circular Economy Transition Conceptual Framework with the Corporate Social Responsibility Mirror," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Stanislav Avsec & Magdalena Jagiełło-Kowalczyk, 2021. "Investigating Possibilities of Developing Self-Directed Learning in Architecture Students Using Design Thinking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.
    6. Kajetan Sadowski, 2021. "Implementation of the New European Bauhaus Principles as a Context for Teaching Sustainable Architecture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-21, September.
    7. Genbao Liu & Tengfei Zhao & Hong Yan & Han Wu & Fuming Wang, 2022. "Evaluation of Urban Green Building Design Schemes to Achieve Sustainability Based on the Projection Pursuit Model Optimized by the Atomic Orbital Search," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-23, September.
    8. Silvio Cristiano & Samuele Zilio, 2021. "Whose Health in Whose City? A Systems Thinking Approach to Support and Evaluate Plans, Policies, and Strategies for Lasting Urban Health," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, November.
    9. Silvio Cristiano & Francesco Gonella, 2020. "‘Kill Venice’: a systems thinking conceptualisation of urban life, economy, and resilience in tourist cities," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    10. Arijit Bhattacharya & Shefali Srivastava & Abhijit Majumdar, 2024. "Circular supply chains in manufacturing—Quo vadis? Accomplishments, challenges and future opportunities," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(5), pages 4397-4423, July.
    11. Marko D. Petrović & Ilija Milovanović & Tamara Gajić & Veronika N. Kholina & Miroslav Vujičić & Ivana Blešić & Filip Đoković & Milan M. Radovanović & Nina B. Ćurčić & Al Fauzi Rahmat & Karlygash Muzdy, 2023. "The Degree of Environmental Risk and Attractiveness as a Criterion for Visiting a Tourist Destination," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-20, September.
    12. Ahmed Farouk Kineber & Mostafa Mo. Massoud & Mohammed Magdy Hamed & Thikryat Jibril Obied Qaralleh, 2023. "Exploring Sustainable Interior Design Implementation Barriers: A Partial Least Structural Equation Modeling Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-20, March.
    13. Wang, Xue-Chao & Jiang, Peng & Yang, Lan & Fan, Yee Van & Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír & Wang, Yutao, 2021. "Extended water-energy nexus contribution to environmentally-related sustainable development goals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    14. Taguta, C. & Senzanje, A. & Kiala, Z. & Malota, M. & Mabhaudhi, Tafadzwanashe, 2022. "Water-energy-food nexus tools in theory and practice: a systematic review," Papers published in Journals (Open Access), International Water Management Institute, pages 1-4:837316..
    15. Bouw, Kathelijne & Noorman, Klaas Jan & Wiekens, Carina J. & Faaij, André, 2021. "Local energy planning in the built environment: An analysis of model characteristics," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    16. Maurizio Massaro & Silvana Secinaro & Francesca Dal Mas & Valerio Brescia & Davide Calandra, 2021. "Industry 4.0 and circular economy: An exploratory analysis of academic and practitioners' perspectives," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1213-1231, February.
    17. Jordana de Oliveira & Dusan Schreiber & Vanusca Dalosto Jahno, 2024. "Circular Economy and Buildings as Material Banks in Mitigation of Environmental Impacts from Construction and Demolition Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-27, June.
    18. Mennat-Allah El-Husseiny & Hamdy El-Setouhy, 2022. "Reviving Low-Tech Modes of Construction as a Method for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    19. Meng, Fanxin & Liu, Gengyuan & Liang, Sai & Su, Meirong & Yang, Zhifeng, 2019. "Critical review of the energy-water-carbon nexus in cities," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1017-1032.
    20. Fedra Vanhuyse, 2024. "The Urban Circularity Assessment Framework (UCAF): a Framework for Planning, Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning from CE Transitions in Cities," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 4(2), pages 1069-1092, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:5:p:1729-:d:1342090. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.