IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i4p1652-d1340283.html

Consumers’ Reaction to Greenwashing in the Saudi Arabian Skincare Market: A Moderated Mediation Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Mohd Adil

    (Department of Management Studies, NIT Hamirpur, Hamirpur 177005, India)

  • Eden Samuel Parthiban

    (Department of Management Studies, NIT Hamirpur, Hamirpur 177005, India)

  • Haitham A. Mahmoud

    (Industrial Engineering Department, College of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh 11421, Saudi Arabia)

  • Jei-Zheng Wu

    (Department of Business Administration, Soochow University, Taipei 100, Taiwan)

  • Mohd Sadiq

    (Peter Faber Business School, Australian Catholic University, North Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2060, Australia)

  • Fatima Suhail

    (Department of Commerce & Business Administration, University of Allahabad, Allahabad 211002, India)

Abstract

Amidst the abundance of skincare options, the process of identifying the most fitting products is a daunting task. This challenge is further intensified when brands frequently lack transparency concerning their environment-friendly characteristics, fostering skepticism among consumers or potential adopters. As a result, to resolve the problem of consumers’ mixed emotions towards skincare brands, it is necessary to understand how greenwashing, green skepticism with two moderators (information quality and brand reputation) shape consumers’ intentions. Drawing on a theoretical conceptual model rooted in the consumer behavior literature, the present investigation tested the hypotheses through cross-sectional survey research. Using convenience sampling, 441 participants were recruited through social media platforms and skincare-related forums. This study establishes the mediating role of green skepticism and the direct impact of greenwashing on consumers’ purchase intentions. Consequently, the statistical significance of the path coefficients provide empirical support for the influence of greenwashing and green skepticism on consumers’ intentions. Our research contributes to the broader discourse on sustainable consumption, offering theoretical advancements and practical implications for the researchers, policymakers, and businesses involved in the Saudi Arabian skincare market.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohd Adil & Eden Samuel Parthiban & Haitham A. Mahmoud & Jei-Zheng Wu & Mohd Sadiq & Fatima Suhail, 2024. "Consumers’ Reaction to Greenwashing in the Saudi Arabian Skincare Market: A Moderated Mediation Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-17, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1652-:d:1340283
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1652/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/4/1652/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Liu, Linlin & Lee, Matthew K.O. & Liu, Renjing & Chen, Jiawen, 2018. "Trust transfer in social media brand communities: The role of consumer engagement," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 41(C), pages 1-13.
    2. Dandan Wang & Thomas Walker, 2023. "How to Regain Green Consumer Trust after Greenwashing: Experimental Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, October.
    3. Aysun Kahraman & İpek Kazançoğlu, 2019. "Understanding consumers' purchase intentions toward natural‐claimed products: A qualitative research in personal care products," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(6), pages 1218-1233, September.
    4. Farrukh Rafiq & Mohd Adil & Mohd Sadiq, 2022. "Does Contextual Factor Influence Travelers’ Towel Reuse Behavior? Insights from Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    5. Khadija Adnan & Noor Amjad & Ayesha Iftikhar & Asma Nisar, 2023. "Study of the Effect of Influencer Marketing on Consumer Purchase Intention with Medators Brand Awareness and Brand Reputation: Organic Skin Care Products in Pakistan," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 9(2), pages 124-133.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Antonios Persakis & Theodoros Nikolopoulos & Ioannis C. Negkakis & Athanasios Pavlopoulos, 2025. "Greenwashing in marketing: a systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 22(4), pages 957-992, December.
    2. Srisathan, Wutthiya Aekthanate & Naruetharadhol, Phaninee, 2025. "Exploring moral hazard and adverse selection in the context of greenwashing and organic product consumption," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nicoleta Isac & Asad Javed & Magdalena Radulescu & Irina Daniela L. Cismasu & Zahid Yousaf & Razvan Sorin Serbu, 2025. "Is greenwashing impacting on green brand trust and purchase intentions? Mediating role of environmental knowledge," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(9), pages 21329-21346, September.
    2. Grüner, Alina & Postel, Lea & Schumann, Jan H., 2024. "Sharing is caring? The effect of negative peer-to-peer experiences on loyalty intentions in the sharing economy," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    3. Jianhua Zhu & Taiwen Feng & Ying Lu & Wenbo Jiang, 2024. "Using blockchain or not? A focal firm's blockchain strategy in the context of carbon emission reduction technology innovation," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3505-3531, May.
    4. Jae-Jang Yang & Rajesh Iyer & Yong-Ki Lee, 2022. "Why Do Local Foodscapes Matter in Building Tourist Trust and Loyalty?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Christodoulou, P. & Psillaki, M. & Sklias, G. & Chatzichristofis, S.A., 2023. "A blockchain-based framework for effective monitoring of EU Green Bonds," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PB).
    6. Emel Yarimoglu & Tugrul Gunay, 2020. "The extended theory of planned behavior in Turkish customers' intentions to visit green hotels," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(3), pages 1097-1108, March.
    7. Sae Eun Lee & Kyu-Hye Lee, 2024. "Environmentally sustainable fashion and conspicuous behavior," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-10, December.
    8. Xusen Cheng & Liyang Qiao & Bo Yang & Ruixue Han, 2025. "To trust or not to trust: a qualitative study of older adults’ online communication during the COVID-19 pandemic," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 25(2), pages 849-878, April.
    9. Irfan Hameed & Zeeshan Hyder & Muhammad Imran & Kashif Shafiq, 2021. "Greenwash and green purchase behavior: an environmentally sustainable perspective," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(9), pages 13113-13134, September.
    10. Ming-Yan Wang & Peng-Zhu Zhang & Cheng-Yang Zhou & Neng-Ye Lai, 2019. "Effect of Emotion, Expectation, and Privacy on Purchase Intention in WeChat Health Product Consumption: The Mediating Role of Trust," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Yuanyuan Cao & Jiantong Zhang & Liang Ma & Xinghong Qin & Junjun Li, 2020. "Examining User’s Initial Trust Building in Mobile Online Health Community Adopting," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-20, June.
    12. Andrea Mezger & Pablo Cabanelas & Mª. Jesús López‐Miguens & Francesca Cabiddu & Klaus Rüdiger, 2020. "Sustainable development and consumption: The role of trust for switching towards green energy," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(8), pages 3598-3610, December.
    13. Ritu Srivastava & Parul Gupta & Harish Kumar & Nikhita Tuli, 2025. "Digital customer engagement: A systematic literature review and research agenda," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 50(1), pages 220-245, February.
    14. Sutherland, Will & Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein, 2018. "The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 328-341.
    15. Krawczyk-Sokołowska, Izabela & Caputa, Wiesława, 2023. "Awareness of network security and customer value – The company and customer perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    16. Davit Marikyan & Savvas Papagiannidis, 2024. "Exercising the “Right to Repair”: A Customer’s Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 193(1), pages 35-61, August.
    17. Jian, Wenze & Zhong, Ziqi, 2025. "Eco positioning drives sustainable fashion consumption through process related strategies and brand familiarity," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 128137, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    18. Tuğba Koç & Fatih Çevik, 2022. "Building Trust in E-Commerce: A Practical Trust Guide for Evaluation," Alphanumeric Journal, Bahadir Fatih Yildirim, vol. 10(2), pages 167-184, December.
    19. Habib, Muhammad Danish & Attri, Rekha & Salam, Mohammad Asif & Yaqub, Muhammad Zafar, 2025. "Bright and dark sides of green consumerism: An in-depth qualitative investigation in retailing context," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    20. Sakinah Shukri & Norhidayah Binti Azman & Dekeng Setyo Budiarto & Sabri Sudin & Aidrina Sofiadin, 2023. "Factor Influencing Consumers Preference in Klang Valley Market: A Study of Natural Personal Care Products," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 15(4), pages 536-545.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:4:p:1652-:d:1340283. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.