IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i24p11224-d1549187.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Green Entrepreneurial Orientation and Sustainable Firm Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Resul Öztürk

    (Department of International Trade and Finance, Selçuk University, Konya 42250, Turkey)

  • Mehtap Öztürk

    (Department of Business Administration, Selçuk University, Konya 42250, Turkey)

  • Zeynep Kızılkan

    (Department of International Trade and Finance, Selçuk University, Konya 42250, Turkey)

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between green entrepreneurial orientation and sustainable firm performance. In order to examine this relationship, a meta-analysis method was used, and analyses were carried out with a Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Software (CMA) v4 package program. In the study, a sample of 23 articles, 42 effect sizes, and 6666 enterprises was reached through a systematic literature review. The studies included in the research were accessed by searching the keywords “green entrepreneurial orientation” and “sustainable firm performance” from Web of Science, EBSCO Host, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases, and only articles without any year limit were included. Throughout the study, statistical analyses were performed on Fisher z values and conducted under the random effects model. The effect size, heterogeneity, and publication bias analyses of green entrepreneurial orientation and sustainable firm performance and its sub-dimensions were tested separately, and the findings were interpreted by converting them into correlation coefficients. As a result of the analyses, it was found that the relationship between green entrepreneurial orientation and sustainable firm performance is positive and highly significant ( p < 0.05). In addition, the relationship between financial, environmental, social, sustainable, entrepreneurial, and green innovation performance, which is the sub-dimensions of sustainable firm performance, and green entrepreneurial orientation, was found to be high and significant ( p < 0.05). However, it was concluded that there is no significant relationship between green innovation performance, which is another dimension of sustainable firm performance, and green entrepreneurial orientation. Moderator analyses revealed that sector and continent have a moderating effect on the relationship between green entrepreneurship orientation and sustainable firm performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Resul Öztürk & Mehtap Öztürk & Zeynep Kızılkan, 2024. "Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Between Green Entrepreneurial Orientation and Sustainable Firm Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-17, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11224-:d:1549187
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11224/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/24/11224/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Muhammad Ishtiaq Ishaq & Huma Sarwar & Junaid Aftab & Simona Franzoni & Ali Raza, 2024. "Accomplishing sustainable performance through leaders' competencies, green entrepreneurial orientation, and innovation in an emerging economy: Moderating role of institutional support," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1515-1532, February.
    2. Maribel Guerrero & Francisco Liñán & F. Rafael Cáceres-Carrasco, 2021. "The influence of ecosystems on the entrepreneurship process: a comparison across developed and developing economies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1733-1759, December.
    3. Ying Guo & LiFang Wang & Yanyu Chen, 2020. "Green Entrepreneurial Orientation and Green Innovation: The Mediating Effect of Supply Chain Learning," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    4. Ameer, Farah & Khan, Naveed R., 2023. "Green entrepreneurial orientation and corporate environmental performance: A systematic literature review," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 755-778.
    5. Xiu-e Zhang & Qing Li, 2021. "Does Green Proactiveness Orientation Improve the Performance of Agricultural New Ventures in China? The Mediating Effect of Sustainable Opportunity Recognition," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, December.
    6. Ning Liu & Haiqing Hu & Zhaoqun Wang, 2022. "The Relationship between Institutional Pressure, Green Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Entrepreneurial Performance—The Moderating Effect of Network Centrality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    7. Arnaldo Coelho & Jorge Ferreira & Catarina Proença, 2024. "The impact of green entrepreneurial orientation on sustainability performance through the effects of green product and process innovation: The moderating role of ambidexterity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3184-3202, May.
    8. Ying Guo & Lifang Wang, 2022. "Environmental Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance: The Role of Environmental Innovation and Stakeholder Pressure," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, February.
    9. Yao, Shouyu & Pan, Yuying & Sensoy, Ahmet & Uddin, Gazi Salah & Cheng, Feiyang, 2021. "Green credit policy and firm performance: What we learn from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    10. Olawale Fatoki, 2019. "Green entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in South Africa," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(1), pages 247-262, September.
    11. Jane Marzouk & Raghda El Ebrashi, 2024. "The interplay among green absorptive capacity, green entrepreneurial, and learning orientations and their effect on triple bottom line performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(3), pages 1962-1976, March.
    12. Qing Xie & Misbah ul Islam & Ying-Yueh Su & Azhar Khan & Sanil S. Hishan & Showkat Ahmad Lone, 2022. "The investigation of sustainable environmental performance of manufacturing companies: mediating role of organizational support and moderating role of CSR," Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(1), pages 4128-4148, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. MengMeng Jiang & XueYan Shan & Sikandar Ali Qalati, 2025. "Enhancing corporate sustainability and employees’ innovative behavior through senior executives sustainable entrepreneurial orientation and green HRM practices: the role of corporate social responsibi," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 1-28, December.
    2. Wencheng Zhang & Fengjuan Zhang & Zhuo Cheng, 2025. "Green entrepreneurial orientation and green human capital: unlocking the potential of green supply chain integration through corporate environmental strategy," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, December.
    3. Muhammad Ishtiaq Ishaq & Huma Sarwar & Junaid Aftab & Simona Franzoni & Ali Raza, 2024. "Accomplishing sustainable performance through leaders' competencies, green entrepreneurial orientation, and innovation in an emerging economy: Moderating role of institutional support," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 1515-1532, February.
    4. Ying Guo, 2023. "External Knowledge Acquisition and Green Innovation in Chinese Firms: Unveiling the Impact of Green Dynamic Capabilities," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(3), pages 21582440231, July.
    5. Xiang Zhang & Xiu-e Zhang & Liu Yang, 2024. "Does Green Entrepreneurial Orientation Improve the Sustainable Performance of Agribusiness? Evidence from China," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    6. Arnaldo Coelho & Jorge Ferreira & Catarina Proença, 2024. "The impact of green entrepreneurial orientation on sustainability performance through the effects of green product and process innovation: The moderating role of ambidexterity," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(4), pages 3184-3202, May.
    7. Guo Ying, 2024. "Digital Entrepreneurial Orientation and Green Innovation in the VUCA Era: The Impact of Cross-organizational Improvisation and Social Ties," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
    8. Ning Liu & Haiqing Hu & Zhaoqun Wang, 2022. "The Relationship between Institutional Pressure, Green Entrepreneurial Orientation, and Entrepreneurial Performance—The Moderating Effect of Network Centrality," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-24, September.
    9. Rana Salman Anwar & Shanayyara Mahmood & Muhammad Ramzan & Hina Adeeb & Alsadig Ahmed & Valentin Marian Antohi & Costinela Fortea & Monica Laura Zlati & Alina Meca & Laurentiu Nicolae Pricope, 2024. "Impact of the Mediating and Moderating Roles of Sustainable Entrepreneurial Intentions on Business Performance in Chinese SMEs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-19, December.
    10. Ameer, Farah & Khan, Naveed R., 2023. "Green entrepreneurial orientation and corporate environmental performance: A systematic literature review," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 41(5), pages 755-778.
    11. Sourav Mondal & Saumya Singh, 2025. "A bibliometric and thematic analysis of green entrepreneurship in business research: current status and future research directions," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 67-139, January.
    12. Bassam Samir Al-Romeedy & Thaib Alharethi, 2024. "Sustainable Tourism Performance Through Green Talent Management: The Mediating Power of Green Entrepreneurship and Climate," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-22, November.
    13. Zhishan Yan & Haiqing Hu, 2024. "Research on the Influencing Factors of Green Entrepreneurial Orientation of Manufacturing Start-ups," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(3), pages 12152-12176, September.
    14. Mohammad Asif, 2023. "Environmental Efficiency of Enterprises: Trends, Strategy, Innovations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Boubaker, Sabri & Liu, Pei-Zhi & Ren, Yi-Shuai & Ma, Chao-Qun, 2024. "Do anti-corruption campaigns affect corporate environmental responsibility? Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    16. Wen, Chen & Xing, Yuhang & Wang, Tao & Liao, Sheng & Gao, Ke, 2025. "How do green supply chain management and renewable energy consumption influence carbon emissions in China and India? A comparative analysis," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    17. Zhao, Xing & Li, Xiangqian & He, Zhuoyi & Shi, Ruoying, 2024. "The relationship between the acquisition of corporate credit and the gender of executives: Evidence from developing countries," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    18. Tan, Xiujie & Yan, Yaxue & Dong, Yuyang, 2022. "Peer effect in green credit induced green innovation: An empirical study from China's Green Credit Guidelines," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    19. Jim Andersén, 2023. "Green resource orchestration: A critical appraisal of the use of resource orchestration in environmental management research, and a research agenda for future study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 32(8), pages 5506-5520, December.
    20. Qiwen Dai & Ju He & Zhongyuan Guo & Yanqiao Zheng & Yue Zhang, 2025. "Green finance for sustainable development: analyzing the effects of green credit on high-polluting firms’ environmental performance," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:24:p:11224-:d:1549187. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.