Author
Listed:
- Qiwen Dai
(Guangxi Normal University)
- Ju He
(Guangxi Normal University)
- Zhongyuan Guo
(Guangxi Normal University)
- Yanqiao Zheng
(Zhejiang Wanli University)
- Yue Zhang
(Guangxi Normal University)
Abstract
This study empirically evaluates the environmental impact of China’s 2012 Green Credit Guidelines on high-polluting firms, utilizing a panel dataset of A-share listed companies spanning 2006–2022. Applying a Difference-in-Differences (DID) framework, the analysis employs Bloomberg’s ESG environmental score—which comprehensively captures resource efficiency, pollution abatement, and ecological conservation—as a proxy for environmental performance. The findings reveal a statistically significant improvement of 2.3–3.7 points in environmental scores attributable to the policy intervention. According to Bloomberg’s calibration, this improvement corresponds to an estimated annual reduction of 1.2–1.8 million tons of SO₂ emissions, representing 15–22% of China’s mid-term (2020–2025) pollution abatement targets. Robustness checks, including Propensity Score Matching (PSM), placebo tests, and alternative measurements, validate the results. The paper identifies two key mechanisms through which green credit policies affect environmental performance: financing constraints and innovation compensation. Heterogeneity analysis shows that firms in eastern regions, competitive industries, and state-owned enterprises (SOEs) experience greater impacts. This paper contributes to the global discourse on sustainable development, offering evidence of how green credit policies can improve high-polluting firms’ environmental performance based on their region, industry and ownership, and providing recommendations for supporting the transition to a greener economy.
Suggested Citation
Qiwen Dai & Ju He & Zhongyuan Guo & Yanqiao Zheng & Yue Zhang, 2025.
"Green finance for sustainable development: analyzing the effects of green credit on high-polluting firms’ environmental performance,"
Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
Handle:
RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05218-8
DOI: 10.1057/s41599-025-05218-8
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:pal:palcom:v:12:y:2025:i:1:d:10.1057_s41599-025-05218-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.nature.com/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.