IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i23p10337-d1529744.html

Engineering Safety and Ethical Challenges in 2045 Artificial Intelligence Singularity

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Suo

    (School of Philosophy, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)

  • Mingcan Li

    (School of Integrated Circuits, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Jinhao Guo

    (College of Electronic Information Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan 030024, China)

  • Yan Sun

    (School of Philosophy, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030006, China)

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has rapidly advanced, increasingly showcasing its powerful learning and computational capabilities. This progress has resulted in significant breakthroughs in areas such as image processing, speech recognition, and autonomous driving. Scientists predict that by around 2045, AI will overcome existing technological barriers, allowing strong AI to surpass human intelligence. However, it will inevitably affect human social relationships and order. Ethical issues associated with AI technology, such as unemployment, privacy breaches, and discrimination, generate a sense of threat among people, resulting in a loss of confidence in AI, which hampers its sustainable progress. Therefore, AI ethical issues are not only significant topics in academia but also become critical concerns for individuals, society, and nations. This article aims to address the challenges of AI ethics safety and the erosion of human confidence, while promoting the sustainable development of AI. It presents an AI ethics safety framework that analyzes engineering ethics and human trust within the context of sustainable AI development, and it recommends governance methods and strategies informed by case studies. Furthermore, we propose evaluation criteria and methods, establishing early-warning thresholds to keep potential AI risks within acceptable limits. Finally, the future prospects for AI ethics safety are highlighted. We hope our research contributes to the sustainable development of AI, ensuring that the arrival of the AI singularity has a positive impact on society with a long-term harmonious coexistence between AI and humanity.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Suo & Mingcan Li & Jinhao Guo & Yan Sun, 2024. "Engineering Safety and Ethical Challenges in 2045 Artificial Intelligence Singularity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-17, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10337-:d:1529744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10337/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10337/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Coyle, Diane & Hampton, Lucy, 2024. "21st century progress in computing," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(1).
    2. Jarrahi, Mohammad Hossein & Askay, David & Eshraghi, Ali & Smith, Preston, 2023. "Artificial intelligence and knowledge management: A partnership between human and AI," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 66(1), pages 87-99.
    3. Araz Taeihagh, 2021. "Governance of artificial intelligence [Application of artificial intelligence for development of intelligent transport system in smart cities]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 40(2), pages 137-157.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Țîţu Aurel Mihail & Bâlc Emanuel & Bâlc Daniel, 2025. "Responsible Artificial Intelligence Management in Mechatronic Systems for the Automotive Industry: Ethics, Transparency, and Governance," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 2213-2223.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ritala, Paavo & Aaltonen, Päivi & Ruokonen, Mika & Nemeh, Andre, 2024. "Developing industrial AI capabilities: An organisational learning perspective," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    2. Erika GRABOCKA & Ervisa NDOKA, 2025. "AI-driven innovation within the ICT sector," Smart Cities and Regional Development (SCRD) Journal, Smart-EDU Hub, Faculty of Public Administration, National University of Political Studies & Public Administration, vol. 9(1), pages 77-97, January.
    3. Robertson, Jeandri & Ferreira, Caitlin & Botha, Elsamari & Oosthuizen, Kim, 2024. "Game changers: A generative AI prompt protocol to enhance human-AI knowledge co-construction," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 499-510.
    4. Mancuso, Ilaria & Petruzzelli, Antonio Messeni & Panniello, Umberto & Frattini, Federico, 2025. "The role of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in innovation processes: a knowledge management perspective," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    5. Tero Erkkilä, 2023. "Global indicators and AI policy: Metrics, policy scripts, and narratives," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(5), pages 811-839, September.
    6. Yao, Xintong & Xi, Yipeng, 2024. "Pathways linking expectations for AI chatbots to loyalty: A moderated mediation analysis," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    7. Subrata Paul & Chandan Koner & Anirban Mitra, 2025. "Unravelling the Dynamics of Academic Collaboration: A Graph-Based Data-Driven Approach," The Review of Socionetwork Strategies, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 325-362, October.
    8. Shefali Srivastava & Vipulesh Shardeo & Ashish Dwivedi & Sanjoy Kumar Paul, 2026. "Analyzing enablers of artificial intelligence for decarbonization: implications for circular supply chains," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 359(1), pages 953-980, April.
    9. Tuzov, Viktor & Lin, Fen, 2024. "Two paths of balancing technology and ethics: A comparative study on AI governance in China and Germany," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(10).
    10. Matej Babšek & Dejan Ravšelj & Lan Umek & Aleksander Aristovnik, 2025. "Mapping the Adoption of Disruptive Technologies in Public Administration: A Bibliometric Analysis and Review of Practical Applications," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, May.
    11. Beatrice Orlando & Veronica Scuotto & Valentina Cillo & Manlio Del Giudice, 2026. "University-business R&D collaborations and innovation in light of Artificial Intelligence: a new AI-based open innovation paradigm," The Journal of Technology Transfer, Springer, vol. 51(1), pages 452-480, February.
    12. Emilia Vann Yaroson & Amélie Abadie & Mélanie Roux, 2025. "Human-artificial intelligence collaboration in supply chain outcomes: the mediating role of responsible artificial intelligence," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 354(1), pages 35-69, November.
    13. repec:bjc:journl:v:12:y:2025:i:12:p:547-612 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Haraguchi, Masahiko & Funahashi, Tomomi & Biljecki, Filip, 2024. "Assessing governance implications of city digital twin technology: A maturity model approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    15. Feng, Cai (Mitsu) & Botha, Elsamari & Pitt, Leyland, 2024. "From HAL to GenAI: Optimizing chatbot impacts with CARE," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 67(5), pages 537-548.
    16. Jin Zhang & Duoxun Ba, 2024. "Intelligent Development, Knowledge Breadth, and High-Tech Enterprise Innovation: The Moderating Role of Knowledge Absorptive Capacity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-18, September.
    17. Zu, Xu & Ni, Guangxian & Hu, Ruifeng, 2025. "AI technology innovation, knowledge management and corporate environmental sustainability: Evidence from Chinese patent data," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    18. Louisa A. Müller & Salomé Florence Grandinger & Dominik K. Kanbach & Sascha Kraus, 2026. "Two sides of a coin: bridging perspectives and unpacking partner selection criteria of corporate venture capitalists and entrepreneurial ventures," International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 1-37, March.
    19. Amit Anand Tiwari & Samrat Gupta & Efpraxia D. Zamani & Neeraj Mittal & Renu Agarwal, 2024. "An Overarching Conceptual Framework for ICT-enabled Responsive Governance," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 1161-1182, June.
    20. Nicole Lemke & Philipp Trein & Frédéric Varone, 2023. "Agenda-setting in nascent policy subsystems: issue and instrument priorities across venues," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 56(4), pages 633-655, December.
    21. Jongheon Kim, 2023. "Traveling AI‐essentialism and national AI strategies: A comparison between South Korea and France," Review of Policy Research, Policy Studies Organization, vol. 40(5), pages 705-728, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:23:p:10337-:d:1529744. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.