IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i22p9946-d1521168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modeling the Integrated Influence of Social, Ecological, and Economic Components on Achieving Sustainable Development Goals: A Cross-Country Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Zoriana Dvulit

    (Department of Foreign Trade and Customs, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 79-000 Lviv, Ukraine)

  • Liana Maznyk

    (Department of Labor Economics and Management, National University of Food Technologies, 01-601 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Natalia Horbal

    (Department of Foreign Trade and Customs, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 79-000 Lviv, Ukraine)

  • Lesia Brych

    (Department of Pedagogy and Innovative Education, Lviv Polytechnic National University, 79-000 Lviv, Ukraine)

  • Sylwia Skrzypek-Ahmed

    (Institute of Public Administration and Business, WSEI University, 20-209 Lublin, Poland)

  • Barbara Szymoniuk

    (Faculty of Management, Lublin University of Technology, 20-618 Lublin, Poland)

  • Tetiana Dluhopolska

    (B. Havrylyshyn Education and Research Institute of International Relations, West Ukrainian National University, 46-027 Ternopil, Ukraine)

Abstract

This study analyzes the impact of social, ecological, and economic components on achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in seven selected countries for the period 2000–2022 (Australia, Canada, Germany, the Netherlands, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, the United States). Using data from the Sustainable Development Reports 2017, 2019, and 2023, a correlation and regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationships between the components and the SDG Index. The results demonstrate a strong positive relationship between social, ecological, and economic factors and progress towards achieving the SDGs, with variations between countries. The study revealed the limitations of aggregated data analysis that negatively affect the implementation of the planning function. The research highlighted the importance of a country-by-country approach in assessing sustainable development progress. The results underscore the importance of developing tailored strategies for achieving the SDGs, which are sensitive to each country’s specific conditions, strengths, and weaknesses in different aspects of sustainability. These conclusions are important for the shaping of policies and strategic planning for achieving the SDGs.

Suggested Citation

  • Zoriana Dvulit & Liana Maznyk & Natalia Horbal & Lesia Brych & Sylwia Skrzypek-Ahmed & Barbara Szymoniuk & Tetiana Dluhopolska, 2024. "Modeling the Integrated Influence of Social, Ecological, and Economic Components on Achieving Sustainable Development Goals: A Cross-Country Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(22), pages 1-22, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9946-:d:1521168
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9946/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/22/9946/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rennings, Klaus & Wiggering, Hubert, 1997. "Steps towards indicators of sustainable development: Linking economic and ecological concepts," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 25-36, January.
    2. Ortwin Renn & Alexander Jager & Jurgen Deuschle & Wolfgang Weimer-Jehle, 2009. "A normative-functional concept of sustainability and its indicators," International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 9(4), pages 291-317.
    3. Yosef Jabareen, 2008. "A New Conceptual Framework for Sustainable Development," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 179-192, April.
    4. World Commission on Environment and Development,, 1987. "Our Common Future," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780192820808.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mykola Odrekhivskyi & Uliana Kohut & Volodymyr Kolomatskyi & Natalia Horbal & Tomasz Wołowiec & Tetiana Dluhopolska, 2025. "Assessment and Forecasting of the Environmental Sustainability Statuses of Innovative Enterprises in the Context of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-26, April.
    2. Zoriana Dvulit & Liana Maznyk & Natalia Horbal & Olga Melnyk & Tetiana Dluhopolska & Bartłomiej Bartnik, 2025. "Harmonizing the Interplay Between SDG 3 and SDG 10 in the Context of Income Inequality: Evidence from the EU and Ukraine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-23, August.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Makena Coffman & Karen Umemoto, 2010. "The triple-bottom-line: framing of trade-offs in sustainability planning practice," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 12(5), pages 597-610, October.
    2. Meppem, Tony & Gill, Roderic, 1998. "Planning for sustainability as a learning concept," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 121-137, August.
    3. H. Akcaoz & H. Kizilay, 2009. "Sustainability of dairy production in Turkey: A case study," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 55(1), pages 25-32.
    4. Katharina Biely & Dries Maes & Steven Passel, 2018. "The idea of weak sustainability is illegitimate," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 223-232, February.
    5. Olivera Kostoska & Ljupco Kocarev, 2019. "A Novel ICT Framework for Sustainable Development Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-31, April.
    6. Piotr Gibas & Agnieszka Majorek, 2020. "Analysis of Land-Use Change between 2012–2018 in Europe in Terms of Sustainable Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-20, February.
    7. Iacob Cătoiu & Diana Maria Vrânceanu & Alina Filip, 2010. "Setting Fair Prices – Fundamental Principle Of Sustainable Marketing," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(27), pages 115-128, February.
    8. Onggarbek Alipbeki & Chaimgul Alipbekova & Arnold Sterenharz & Zhanat Toleubekova & Saule Makenova & Meirzhan Aliyev & Nursultan Mineyev, 2020. "Analysis of Land-Use Change in Shortandy District in Terms of Sustainable Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-16, May.
    9. Lie Ma & Qiu Xie & Shiying Shi & Xiaosu Ye & Aifeng Zhao, 2017. "Regional Maldistribution of China’s Hospitals Based on Their Structural System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-18, June.
    10. Janelle Knox‐Hayes & Shekhar Chandra & Jungwoo Chun, 2021. "The role of values in shaping sustainable development perspectives and outcomes: A case study of Iceland," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(2), pages 363-377, March.
    11. Ioana Cecilia Popescu & Diana Maria Vrânceanu & Mihai Ioan Roșca, 2012. "The role of promotional strategies for small and medium- sized entreprises in sustainable marketing," Romanian Economic Journal, Department of International Business and Economics from the Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest, vol. 15(46bis), pages 97-110, December.
    12. Hasan Fehmi Topal & Dexter V.L. Hunt & Christopher D.F. Rogers, 2020. "Urban Sustainability and Smartness Understanding (USSU)—Identifying Influencing Factors: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-30, June.
    13. Phillis, Yannis A. & Andriantiatsaholiniaina, Luc A., 2001. "Sustainability: an ill-defined concept and its assessment using fuzzy logic," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 37(3), pages 435-456, June.
    14. Rigby, Dan & Woodhouse, Phil & Young, Trevor & Burton, Michael, 2001. "Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agricultural practice," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(3), pages 463-478, December.
    15. Diana Tuomasjukka & Staffan Berg & Marcus Lindner, 2013. "Managing Sustainability of Fennoscandian Forests and Their Use by Law and/or Agreement: For Whom and Which Purpose?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-32, December.
    16. Emilia Conte, 2018. "The Era of Sustainability: Promises, Pitfalls and Prospects for Sustainable Buildings and the Built Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-16, June.
    17. Williams, Belinda & Wilmshurst, Trevor & Clift, Robert, 2011. "Sustainability reporting by local government in Australia: Current and future prospects," Accounting forum, Elsevier, vol. 35(3), pages 176-186.
    18. Kwasi Anarfi & Ross A. Hill & Chris Shiel, 2020. "Highlighting the Sustainability Implications of Urbanisation: A Comparative Analysis of Two Urban Areas in Ghana," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-24, August.
    19. Ediger, Volkan S. & Hosgor, Enes & Surmeli, A. Nesen & Tatlidil, Huseyin, 2007. "Fossil fuel sustainability index: An application of resource management," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 2969-2977, May.
    20. Kwasi Anarfi & Chris Shiel & Ross A. Hill, 2020. "Assessing How Sustainability Is Promoted in Ghana’s National Urban Policy and Action Plan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-15, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:22:p:9946-:d:1521168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.