IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i21p9490-d1511547.html

City Boundaries—Utilizing Fuzzy Set Theory for the Identification and Localization of the Urban–Rural Transition Zone

Author

Listed:
  • Andrzej Biłozor

    (Department of Socio-Economic Geography, Institute of Spatial Management and Geography, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Szymon Czyża

    (Department of Geoinformation and Cartography, Institute of Geodesy and Civil Engineering, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Iwona Cieślak

    (Department of Socio-Economic Geography, Institute of Spatial Management and Geography, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland)

  • Karol Szuniewicz

    (Department of Geoinformation and Cartography, Institute of Geodesy and Civil Engineering, Faculty of Geoengineering, University of Warmia Mazury in Olsztyn, 10-720 Olsztyn, Poland)

Abstract

This article examines the potential of fuzzy set theory for analysing gradual changes in land use patterns within peri-urban areas. The primary objective of the study was to propose a methodology based on fuzzy set theory for the precise delineation of city boundaries and the identification and spatial localisation of the urban–rural transition zone. The analysis focused on elucidating the defining parameters of this area and the scope of land use changes within the urban–rural transition zone. The analysis employed data from four discrete time points. The data were collected in 2005, 2010, 2017, and 2022. The characteristics of the urban–rural transition zone were evaluated through an examination of historical data and the current land use patterns in regions experiencing direct urbanization pressure. The study demonstrated that, although spatial barriers remain, the city’s development has continued at a consistent pace. Between 2005 and 2010, the area of land classified as urban exhibited a 10% increase, with a further 7% increase observed in the subsequent period, spanning 2010 to 2017. In the most recent period under examination, the urban land area increased by 9%, a figure that is consistent with the rates observed in previous years. These results indicate the stability of urbanization processes in the analysed city, while also revealing significant changes in the limits of urban development and in the intensity of land use. The research project concentrated on the city of Olsztyn and the neighbouring suburban areas, which are subject to direct influence from the city’s expansion. The area under study encompasses 202.4 km 2 within an eight-km radius of the city centre. The authors of the study emphasized the necessity for systematic monitoring of changes in the transition zone between urban and rural areas. This is to ensure effective control of spatial development and ongoing adjustment of planning tools to effectively prevent uncontrolled expansion. The methodology used enabled the precise delimitation of urban development and the transition zone. This allowed for an in-depth analysis of changes in land use intensity.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrzej Biłozor & Szymon Czyża & Iwona Cieślak & Karol Szuniewicz, 2024. "City Boundaries—Utilizing Fuzzy Set Theory for the Identification and Localization of the Urban–Rural Transition Zone," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-26, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9490-:d:1511547
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9490/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/21/9490/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhao, Jincai & Ji, Guangxing & Yue, YanLin & Lai, Zhizhu & Chen, Yulong & Yang, Dongyang & Yang, Xu & Wang, Zheng, 2019. "Spatio-temporal dynamics of urban residential CO2 emissions and their driving forces in China using the integrated two nighttime light datasets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 235(C), pages 612-624.
    2. Mingxing Chen & Yuan Zhou & Xinrong Huang & Chao Ye, 2021. "The Integration of New-Type Urbanization and Rural Revitalization Strategies in China: Origin, Reality and Future Trends," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-16, February.
    3. Nick Gallent & Dave Shaw, 2007. "Spatial planning, area action plans and the rural-urban fringe," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 50(5), pages 617-638.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Huadun & Du, Qianxi & Huo, Tengfei & Liu, Peiran & Cai, Weiguang & Liu, Bingsheng, 2023. "Spatiotemporal patterns and driving mechanism of carbon emissions in China's urban residential building sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    2. Yumeng Cheng & Wanqing Wang & Takeshi Kinoshita & Konomi Ikebe, 2025. "Fostering Sustainable Livelihoods and Community Resilience in a Depopulated Japanese Mountainous Settlement: Connecting Local Culture and Ikigai-Zukuri Through the Ōsawa Engawa Café," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-49, June.
    3. Wei Wei & Haibo Du & Libang Ma & Chunfang Liu & Junju Zhou, 2024. "Spatiotemporal dynamics of CO2 emissions using nighttime light data: a comparative analysis between the Yellow and Yangtze River Basins in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 1081-1102, January.
    4. Liu, Yansui & Li, Xuhong & Guo, Yuanzhi, 2024. "Exploring land system reform for demographic transition in rural China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    5. Yuqi Zhu & Siwei Shen & Linyu Du & Jun Fu & Jian Zou & Lina Peng & Rui Ding, 2023. "Spatial and Temporal Interaction Coupling of Digital Economy, New-Type Urbanization and Land Ecology and Spatial Effects Identification: A Study of the Yangtze River Delta," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-27, March.
    6. Xiwen Fu & Shuxin Wang, 2022. "How to Promote Low-Carbon Cities with Blockchain Technology? A Blockchain-Based Low-Carbon Development Model for Chinese Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Yongxing Li & Wei Guo & Peixian Li & Xuesheng Zhao & Jinke Liu, 2023. "Exploring the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of CO 2 Emissions through a Combination of Nighttime Light and MODIS NDVI Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    8. Jing Xu & Zhenjian Zeng & Zhenhua Xi & Zhencong Peng & Gangheng Chen & Xiting Zhu & Xinjia Chen, 2024. "Research on Sustainable Urban–Rural Integration Development: Measuring Levels, Influencing Factors, and Exploring Driving Mechanisms—Taking Eight Cities in the Greater Bay Area as Examples," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-29, April.
    9. Uchendu Eugene Chigbu & Ruishan Chen & Chao Ye, 2022. "Land Perspectives: People, Tenure, Planning, Tools, Space, and Health," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-5, February.
    10. Saskia Van Broekhoven & Anne Lorène Vernay, 2018. "Integrating Functions for a Sustainable Urban System: A Review of Multifunctional Land Use and Circular Urban Metabolism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-24, June.
    11. Zeng, Lijun & Du, Wenjing & Wang, Jinfeng & Hong, Weichen & Zhang, Jinsuo, 2024. "An evolutionary game analysis of new urbanization in mineral resource abundant regions in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    12. Patricia LÓPEZ-GOYBURU, 2024. "Initiatives On The Metropolitan Border Of Buenos Aires: 1920-2020," Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(4), pages 28-47, November.
    13. Somayeh Ahani & Hashem Dadashpoor, 2021. "Urban growth containment policies for the guidance and control of peri-urbanization: a review and proposed framework," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(10), pages 14215-14244, October.
    14. Sen Zhang & Keke Sun & Haoge Zhao & Hong Yao & Lei Shen, 2025. "Research on the Construction and Practice of an Urban–Rural Integration Planning Model from the Perspective of Element Flow: A Case Study of Xiuzhou District, Jiaxing City," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-19, May.
    15. Ming Li & Yongwang Cao & Jin Dai & Jianxin Song & Mengyin Liang, 2025. "A Comprehensive Review of Urban Expansion and Its Driving Factors," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-20, July.
    16. Youxu Zheng & Jiangdi Tan & Yaping Huang & Zhiyong Wang, 2022. "The Governance Path of Urban–Rural Integration in Changing Urban–Rural Relationships in the Metropolitan Area: A Case Study of Wuhan, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-19, August.
    17. Chen, Yufan & Xu, Kechen & He, Yong & Chen, Qianhu, 2026. "Utilitarian or experiential? Divergent location strategies of the rural coffee retail in the Hangzhou metropolitan area," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    18. Blaszke, Malgorzata & Przedanska, Justyna & Nowak, Maciej J., 2024. "Litigation over changes in the intended use of agricultural land as a challenge to spatial planning in rural areas in Poland," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 203(2), July.
    19. Jinghua Song & Yuyi Zhu & Xiangzhai Chu & Xiu Yang, 2024. "Research on the Vitality of Public Spaces in Tourist Villages through Social Network Analysis: A Case Study of Mochou Village in Hubei, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, March.
    20. Jing Cheng & Jiarui Chen, 2024. "Can new urbanization pilot policies promote green technology innovation in cities: Empirical evidence from China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-23, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:21:p:9490-:d:1511547. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.