IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7720-d1471850.html

An Assessment of the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward General Waste Segregation among the Population of the United Arab Emirates

Author

Listed:
  • Shahad K. Hassooni

    (Department of Biology, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates)

  • Khaled A. El-Tarabily

    (Department of Biology, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates)

  • Abdelghafar M. Abu-Elsaoud

    (Department of Biology, College of Science, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11623, Saudi Arabia
    Department of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt)

  • Seham M. Al Raish

    (Department of Biology, College of Science, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 15551, United Arab Emirates)

Abstract

Increases in the human population and economic development have led to a rise in waste production, which poses significant environmental risks and presents a pressing global issue in waste management. Among other countries, this situation affects the United Arab Emirates (UAE). On the other hand, poor waste segregation practices can result in failed waste recycling efforts, leading to the excessive use of resources and worsening issues (such as energy consumption, global warming, and sustainable development). Waste segregation is a crucial step in waste management, which involves dividing waste according to its characteristics and type. By following this procedure, recycling effectiveness is increased, the environmental impact is decreased, and hazardous material disposal is ensured. Beneficial waste segregation reduces contamination, making it possible to recover valuable materials and thus use fewer landfills. Even though the failings in waste segregation are a severe issue, insufficient research has been carried out. This includes research on the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of people living in the UAE regarding waste segregation, information which is crucial to developing a successful intervention to address this problem. The current study evaluated the KAP concerning waste segregation among UAE citizens and identified correlations between KAP variables, with the primary aim of filling a research gap, while analyzing the correlations between sociodemographic characteristics and KAP levels, which was the secondary aim. This was accomplished by a cross-sectional study conducted all over the UAE. Data were collected from 391 participants using a five-point Likert scale questionnaire that was developed from previous research and investigated sociodemographic characteristics, waste segregation practices (5), attitudes (5), and knowledge (5). UAE University’s ethical committees approved this study (ERSC_2024_4360) for research, and the results were confirmed through statistical analyses and Cronbach’s alpha testing. The inclusion criteria targeted residents of the UAE who were 18 years of age or above, and the survey was distributed via an online platform (Google Forms) with non-probability sampling. G*Power statistical power analysis estimated a minimum sample size of 385 participants. To identify correlations in the results, a structural equation model (SEM) and SPSS, such as Chi-square tests and Spearman correlation coefficients, were used to assess the associations between KAP variables. These tests were chosen for their robustness in handling categorical and continuous data, respectively. A notable majority (84.1%) of the participants were female, and 15.9% were male; the gender difference was highly significant, as revealed by the Chi-square test. Most participants (67.0%) fell into the 18–24 age group. The highest level of education reported was a bachelor’s degree (47.3%). The parents’ educational levels showed a relatively high level of education, with more than half having at least a high school degree or higher: father’s education level (67.2%) and mother’s education level (73.1%). Most participants were students (58.8%), but a significant portion of the sample was employed (25.1%). Unemployment was reported at 12.3%. The parents’ employment statuses showed a higher percentage of unemployed mothers (49.4%) compared to fathers (6.9%). The average scores suggested a favorable inclination toward sustainability (mean ± standard deviation (SD) for knowledge, 3.59 ± 0.78; poor knowledge, 3.6%; and excellent knowledge, 16.9%), attitudes (3.73 ± 0.77; poor attitudes, 2.8%; and excellent attitudes, 22.5%), and practices (3.62 ± 0.76; poor practices, 2.3%; and excellent practices, 16.4%), with all the means surpassing the midpoint. In the correlation test, the current study demonstrated positive correlations between knowledge and attitudes (r = 0.666, p < 0.001) and between knowledge and practices (r = 0.682, p < 0.001). Also, a positive correlation (r = 0.159, p < 0.001) was found between general waste segregation KAP and sociodemographic variables, with a significant correlation (r = 0.110) between attitudes and gender. These findings emphasize the possibility of using focused educational and policy interventions to improve waste segregation behaviors. An additional investigation is advised to delve into the fundamental mechanisms behind these correlations and devise customized approaches to encourage sustainable waste management practices among various demographic groups in the UAE.

Suggested Citation

  • Shahad K. Hassooni & Khaled A. El-Tarabily & Abdelghafar M. Abu-Elsaoud & Seham M. Al Raish, 2024. "An Assessment of the Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward General Waste Segregation among the Population of the United Arab Emirates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7720-:d:1471850
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7720/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7720/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Oluwatobi Mary Owojori & Ratshalingwa Mulaudzi & Joshua N. Edokpayi, 2022. "Student’s Knowledge, Attitude, and Perception (KAP) to Solid Waste Management: A Survey towards a More Circular Economy from a Rural-Based Tertiary Institution in South Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-23, January.
    2. Yixuan Wang & Xingle Long & Liang Li & Qinglin Wang & Xiping Ding & Sijia Cai, 2021. "Extending theory of planned behavior in household waste sorting in China: the moderating effect of knowledge, personal involvement, and moral responsibility," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(5), pages 7230-7250, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Noorita Mohammad & Basri Badyalina & Shahira Ariffin & Nani Ilyana Syafie & Intan Syafinas Mat Shafie & Khamisah Abd Manaf, 2024. "Young People's Involvement in Reused Cooking Oil," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 16(2), pages 19-27.
    2. Dingde Xu & Chen Qing & Yang Chen & Jia He & Fengwan Zhang, 2023. "Sustainable Development of Rural Human Settlements in the Information Age: Can Internet Use Drive Farmers to Participate in Garbage Classification?," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Jon Martin Denstadli & Ole Jakob Sønstebø, 2025. "Come together! Or not? Homebuyers’ interest in sharing facilities with fellow residents," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 62(14), pages 2787-2806, November.
    4. Woraluck Sribanasarn & Anujit Phumiphan & Siwa Kaewplang & Mathinee Khotdee & Ounla Sivanpheng & Anongrit Kangrang, 2025. "Sustainability in Action: Analyzing Mahasarakham University’s Integration of SDGs in Education, Research, and Operations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-25, July.
    5. Marica Antovska-Mitev & Tatjana Drangovska, 2024. "Awareness on Concept of Circular Economy in North Macedonia on the Example of First Cycle University Students," Economic Studies journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 7, pages 161-180.
    6. Ana Alexandra Mocanu & Gabriel Brătucu & Eliza Ciobanu & Ioana Bianca Chițu & Anita Cornelia Szakal, 2024. "Can the Circular Economy Unlock Sustainable Business Growth? Insights from Qualitative Research with Specialists in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-28, February.
    7. Yousif Mohammed Elmosaad & Ahmed M. Al Rajeh & Maria Blesilda B. Llaguno & Sami Saad Alqaimi & Ali Mohammed Alsalman & Ali Yousif Alkishi & Hassan Hussain & Mohammed Ahmed Alhoudaib & Othman Saad Alna, 2023. "Self-Reported Household Waste Recycling and Segregation Practices among Families in Eastern Region of Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-16, January.
    8. Rizal Edy Halim & Shinta Rahmani & Gita Gayatri & Asnan Furinto & Yudi Sutarso, 2022. "The Effectiveness of Product Sustainability Claims to Mitigate Negative Electronic Word of Mouth (N-eWOM)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Ife Dosumu & Sunday Yusuf Kpalo & Aliyu Umar Sadiq & Sylvia Chidimma Obiukwu, 2025. "The Challenges and Barriers Faced in Implementing Circular Economy Practices in Waste Management in Karu LGA of Nasarawa State, Nigeria," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 9(9), pages 1991-1998, September.
    10. Jing Liu & Khairul Manami Kamarudin & Yuqi Liu & Jinzhi Zou & Jiaqi Zhang, 2022. "Developing a Behavior Change Framework for Pandemic Prevention and Control in Public Spaces in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-24, February.
    11. Deliberador, Lucas Rodrigues & Santos, Alexandre Borges & Carrijo, Pâmella Rodrigues Silva & Batalha, Mário Otávio & César, Aldara da Silva & Ferreira, Luís Miguel D.F., 2023. "How risk perception regarding the COVID-19 pandemic affected household food waste: Evidence from Brazil," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 87(PA).
    12. Cheng Guo & Meng Li & Hong Chen, 2025. "Study on the Influencing Factors of Green Agricultural Subsidies on Straw Resource Utilization Technology Adopted by Farmers in Heilongjiang Province, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-18, January.
    13. Steven Jerie & Tapiwa Shabani & Pascal Manyakaidze & Takunda Shabani, 2025. "Towards Boosting Adoption of Circular Integrated Solid Waste Management to Achieve Sustainable Development Goal 13 (Climate Action) in Southern Africa," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(7), pages 6593-6606, December.
    14. Julalak Phrophayak & Rapeepat Techarungruengsakul & Mathinee Khotdee & Sattawat Thuangchon & Ratsuda Ngamsert & Haris Prasanchum & Ounla Sivanpheng & Anongrit Kangrang, 2024. "Enhancing Green University Practices through Effective Waste Management Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-25, April.
    15. Wanggi Jaung & L. Roman Carrasco & Daniel R. Richards & Shaikh Fairul Edros Ahmad Shaikh & Puay Yok Tan, 2023. "The role of urban nature experiences in sustainable consumption: a transboundary urban ecosystem service," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(1), pages 601-621, January.
    16. Ning Zhu & Qiaoling Guo & Tongyang Wei, 2024. "Impact of Environmental Regulation on the Level of Domestic Waste Classification Among Rural Residents: A Case Study from Rural China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-24, December.
    17. Xin, Xiuying & Jia, Ning & Ling, Shuai & He, Zhengbing, 2023. "The effect of the ‘yield to pedestrians’ policy on risky pedestrian behaviors: Is it a ‘two-edged sword’?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    18. Zhuling Liu & Janet Z. Yang & Susan S. Clark & Michael A. Shelly, 2022. "Recycling as a planned behavior: the moderating role of perceived behavioral control," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(9), pages 11011-11026, September.
    19. Nketiah, Emmanuel & Song, Huaming & Cai, Xiang & Adjei, Mavis & Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Obuobi, Bright, 2022. "Citizens’ intention to invest in municipal solid waste to energy projects in Ghana: The impact of direct and indirect effects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PC).
    20. Han, Myat Su & Chen, Weiming, 2021. "Determinants of eco-innovation adoption of small and medium enterprises: An empirical analysis in Myanmar," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7720-:d:1471850. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.