IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i17p7641-d1470367.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Service Design for Social Innovation: A New Path for the Development of Government Public Services Based on the TB4D Model

Author

Listed:
  • Bojun Hou

    (Aesthetic Education Teaching Center, and College of Humanities and Development Studies, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China)

Abstract

Public service is related to everyone’s life and future and directly feeds back on the development of society and the country. How to better shape and develop it is a critical issue for both individuals and groups. As the primary provider, the government plays a vital role in its creation, development, and transformation. In recent years, with the rapid development of human society, this field has been placed in the midst of new challenges. These are the difficulties that government departments urgently need to solve, and the traditional solutions have shown apparent inadequacies. Service design, as a powerful responder, is gradually emerging and playing an important role, influencing a series of dimensions from service innovation to social policies. The application of service design in government public services holds significant social value. However, related research remains in its infancy, needing a systematic theoretical framework. This paper focuses on government public service design and carries out systematic design research on it in order to realize the corresponding social and academic value. This paper established a theoretical framework for government public service design centered on the TB4D model, based on an in-depth study of the relevant literature, nearly 30 representative industry case studies, and three practical projects conducted by the author. The model integrates the TSLC operational mechanism model, the Behavior-Organization-Policy operational content model, the “3 + 1” development mode, and the method reference guide for government public service design based on the Double Diamond design process model. The letters and numbers in the model’s name sequentially represent these four components. Specifically, the TSLC operational mechanism model derives its name from the initials of four parts: trans-dimensional cognitive and thinking mode, systems thinking, learning interactive innovation process, and cultural regeneration and value shaping. The “3 + 1” development model denotes three forms of development centered on internal design capability and the form of joint development focused on external design capabilities. The TB4D model combines both theory and practice, yet to better illustrate its overall performance, this paper reverted to the practical domain. It quantitatively evaluated 20 complete projects, calculating the mean value and 95% confidence intervals to verify the model. The results demonstrate that the model is valid and possesses high industry representativeness, effectiveness, and universality. The organic operation of the model will provide systematic, innovative solutions to address the problems and challenges faced in the public service field, promoting the sustainable development of society. Since research in this area is still at an early stage, the theoretical model proposed here emphasizes its intrinsic principles and universal logic. It aims to provide foundational theoretical support for the development of this field and systematic guidance for relevant practices. As the industry evolves, the model’s content can be further refined and enriched to better reflect contemporary characteristics. Additionally, because this model serves as a foundational framework for the entire field, it can be further expanded to develop sub-models with local characteristics when applied to different regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Bojun Hou, 2024. "Service Design for Social Innovation: A New Path for the Development of Government Public Services Based on the TB4D Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-26, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7641-:d:1470367
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7641/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/17/7641/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jakob Trischler & Timo Dietrich & Sharyn Rundle-Thiele, 2019. "Co-design: from expert- to user-driven ideas in public service design," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(11), pages 1595-1619, November.
    2. Marit Engen & Martin Fransson & Johan Quist & Per Skålén, 2021. "Continuing the development of the public service logic: a study of value co-destruction in public services," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(6), pages 886-905, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trischler, Jakob & Johnson, Mikael & Kristensson, Per, 2020. "A service ecosystem perspective on the diffusion of sustainability-oriented user innovations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 552-560.
    2. Daniela Selloni & Anna Meroni, 2023. "Exploring Service Design as a Commoning Approach: The Engaging Strategy of the Service Master Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-17, November.
    3. Finocchiaro Castro, Massimo & Guccio, Calogero & Rizzo, Ilde, 2023. "How "one-size-fits-all" public works contract does it better? An assessment of infrastructure provision in Italy," EconStor Preprints 270729, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    4. Maria Taivalsaari Røhnebæk & Valérie François & Norbert Kiss & Alberto Peralta & Luis Rubalcaba & Kirsty Strokosch & Edwina Yida Zhu, 2024. "Public service logic and the creation of value propositions through framing," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(2), pages 399-420, February.
    5. Cayetano Medina-Molina & Noemí Pérez-Macías & Sierra Rey-Tienda, 2024. "Strategies for urban cycling: an analysis through generalized analytic induction," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 21(4), pages 963-997, December.
    6. Xinya You, 2025. "Management as a design practice: a multi-case study on designing value co-creation mechanisms," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-30, December.
    7. Matthew Alexander & Niklas Vallström, 2023. "Value co-destruction: Problems and solutions," AMS Review, Springer;Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 13(3), pages 200-210, December.
    8. Sorin-Aurel Moraru & Adrian Alexandru Moșoi & Dominic Mircea Kristaly & Ionuț Moraru & Vlad Ștefan Petre & Delia Elisabeta Ungureanu & Liviu Marian Perniu & Dan Rosenberg & Maria Elena Cocuz, 2022. "Using IoT Assistive Technologies for Older People Non-Invasive Monitoring and Living Support in Their Homes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-22, May.
    9. Daniele Busciantella-Ricci & Alessia Macchi & Sara Viviani & Alessandra Rinaldi, 2024. "Healthy and Inclusive Neighbourhoods: A Design Research Toolkit for the Promotion of Healthy Behaviours," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-35, April.
    10. Vieira, Alessandro Diogo & Leite, Higor & Volochtchuk, Ana Vitória Lachowski, 2022. "The impact of voice assistant home devices on people with disabilities: A longitudinal study," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Busse, Maria & Zscheischler, Jana & Zoll, Felix & Rogga, Sebastian & Siebert, Rosemarie, 2023. "Co-design approaches in land use related sustainability science – A systematic review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    12. Cecilia Avila-Garzon & Jorge Bacca-Acosta, 2024. "Thirty Years of Research and Methodologies in Value Co-Creation and Co-Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-28, March.
    13. Bruno Féral, 2024. "La place des valeurs dans la perception par les associations de l'évaluation de leur action conduite par un partenaire public," Post-Print hal-04929378, HAL.
    14. Lotte Vallentin-Holbech & Julie Dalgaard Guldager & Timo Dietrich & Sharyn Rundle-Thiele & Gunver Majgaard & Patricia Lyk & Christiane Stock, 2020. "Co-Creating a Virtual Alcohol Prevention Simulation with Young People," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-12, February.
    15. Alison Kennedy & Catherine Cosgrave & Joanna Macdonald & Kate Gunn & Timo Dietrich & Susan Brumby, 2021. "Translating Co-Design from Face-to-Face to Online: An Australian Primary Producer Project Conducted during COVID-19," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-14, April.
    16. Ilaria Mariani & Irene Bianchi, 2023. "Conceptualising Digital Transformation in Cities: A Multi-Dimensional Framework for the Analysis of Public Sector Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, May.
    17. Georgios Kontogeorgis & Nikolaos Varotsis, 2021. "Reinstating Greek E-Governance: A Framework For E-Government Benchmarking, Improvement And Government Policies," Public administration issues, Higher School of Economics, issue 6, pages 103-127.
    18. Hodong Lee & Boyoung Kim, 2022. "Invigorating Care Farm Ecosystem Based on Public Service Innovation: Case of South Korea," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-19, May.
    19. Higor Leite & Flavia Celene Quadros, 2025. "Lean applications across the healthcare ecosystem: Value creation, destruction and a research agenda," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 18(1), pages 24-47, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:17:p:7641-:d:1470367. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.