IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p7218-d1461655.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Blockchain Effect on Courier Supply Chains Digitalization and Its Contribution to Industry 4.0 within the Circular Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Ra’ed Masa’deh

    (Department of Management Information Systems, School of Business, The University of Jordan, Aljubeiha, Queen Rania Street, Amman 11942, Jordan)

  • Mustafa Jaber

    (Business Faculty, Middle East University, Amman 11831, Jordan)

  • Abdel-Aziz Ahmad Sharabati

    (Business Faculty, Middle East University, Amman 11831, Jordan)

  • Ahmad Yacoub Nasereddin

    (Business Faculty, Middle East University, Amman 11831, Jordan)

  • Ahmad Marei

    (Business Faculty, Middle East University, Amman 11831, Jordan)

Abstract

The goal of this research is to investigate blockchain technology’s influence on digitizing courier supply chains and advancing Industry 4.0, which leads the digitization revolution by integrating blockchain to digitize processes that would serve the circular economy. It evaluates how blockchain enhances transparency, traceability, and digital processes in logistics, promoting sustainability through waste reduction and improved reuse. The study aims to identify the benefits and challenges of blockchain integration, develop a conceptual framework, and provide actionable insights to improve supply chain management, operational efficiency, and sustainability. This research uses a qualitative research method including a literature review as well as interviews for case studies to explore both the benefits and challenges when applying blockchain technology in courier organizations in Industry 4.0 within the circular economy. The results show that blockchain technology can enhance the security, traceability, and efficiency of courier supply chains, reduce theft, error risk, and fraud, as well as facilitate specific process automation via smart contracts. Blockchain technology can support the digital transformation of logistics organizations and enhance circular economy networks in Industry 4.0 by enabling automation, transparency, traceability, and maintaining responsibility for the environment. This research is an exploration of the effect of blockchain technology on the courier supply chain in the logistics firms in Industry 4.0 within the circular economy and the development of a conceptual framework for usage. In addition, it capitalizes on both coordination and collaboration among players through decentralization to obtain maximum fruitful benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Ra’ed Masa’deh & Mustafa Jaber & Abdel-Aziz Ahmad Sharabati & Ahmad Yacoub Nasereddin & Ahmad Marei, 2024. "The Blockchain Effect on Courier Supply Chains Digitalization and Its Contribution to Industry 4.0 within the Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7218-:d:1461655
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7218/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/7218/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Goetschalckx, Marc & Vidal, Carlos J. & Dogan, Koray, 2002. "Modeling and design of global logistics systems: A review of integrated strategic and tactical models and design algorithms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 143(1), pages 1-18, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. M. Fattahi & M. Mahootchi & S. M. Moattar Husseini, 2016. "Integrated strategic and tactical supply chain planning with price-sensitive demands," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 242(2), pages 423-456, July.
    2. Hasani, Aliakbar & Khosrojerdi, Amirhossein, 2016. "Robust global supply chain network design under disruption and uncertainty considering resilience strategies: A parallel memetic algorithm for a real-life case study," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 20-52.
    3. Feng, Cheng-Min & Wu, Pei-Ju, 2009. "A tax savings model for the emerging global manufacturing network," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 534-546, December.
    4. Jun Wang & Jingbo Yin & Rafi Ullah Khan & Siqi Wang & Tie Zheng, 2021. "A Study of Inbound Logistics Mode Based on JIT Production in Cruise Ship Construction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-18, February.
    5. Jiang, Yonglei & Sheu, Jiuh-Biing & Peng, Zixuan & Yu, Bin, 2018. "Hinterland patterns of China Railway (CR) express in China under the Belt and Road Initiative: A preliminary analysis," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 189-201.
    6. Gunasekaran, Angappa & Ngai, Eric W.T., 2009. "Modeling and analysis of build-to-order supply chains," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 195(2), pages 319-334, June.
    7. Jung, Se-Youn & Huh, Woonghee Tim & Park, Kun Soo, 2022. "Impact of the arm’s length regulation on a supply chain with asymmetric retailers," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 300(3), pages 865-883.
    8. Hsu, Chaug-Ing & Li, Hui-Chieh, 2009. "An integrated plant capacity and production planning model for high-tech manufacturing firms with economies of scale," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(2), pages 486-500, April.
    9. Quetschlich, Mathias & Moetz, André & Otto, Boris, 2021. "Optimisation model for multi-item multi-echelon supply chains with nested multi-level products," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 290(1), pages 144-158.
    10. Renato Matta, 2019. "Product costing in the strategic formation of a supply chain," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 272(1), pages 389-427, January.
    11. Wang, Juite & Shu, Yun-Feng, 2007. "A possibilistic decision model for new product supply chain design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 1044-1061, March.
    12. da Silva Stefano, Gustavo & Antunes, Tiago dos Santos & Lacerda, Daniel Pacheco & Wolf Motta Morandi, Maria Isabel & Piran, Fabio Sartori, 2022. "The impacts of inventory in transfer pricing and net income: Differences between traditional accounting and throughput accounting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(2).
    13. Vernon N. Hsu & Kaijie Zhu, 2011. "Tax-Effective Supply Chain Decisions Under China's Export-Oriented Tax Policies," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 13(2), pages 163-179, November.
    14. Ahumada, Omar & Villalobos, J. Rene, 2009. "Application of planning models in the agri-food supply chain: A review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 196(1), pages 1-20, July.
    15. Feng, Cheng-Min & Wu, Pei-Ju & Chia, Kai-Chieh, 2010. "A hybrid fuzzy integral decision-making model for locating manufacturing centers in China: A case study," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 200(1), pages 63-73, January.
    16. M Kannegiesser & H-O Günther, 2011. "An integrated optimization model for managing the global value chain of a chemical commodities manufacturer," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(4), pages 711-721, April.
    17. Aurelija Burinskienė, 2021. "Designing a Multi-Stage Transport System Serving e-Commerce Activity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, May.
    18. Keskin, Burcu B. & Uster, Halit, 2007. "Meta-heuristic approaches with memory and evolution for a multi-product production/distribution system design problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(2), pages 663-682, October.
    19. Nina Linn Ulstein & Marielle Christiansen & Roar Grønhaug & Nick Magnussen & Marius M. Solomon, 2006. "Elkem Uses Optimization in Redesigning Its Supply Chain," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 314-325, August.
    20. Wu, Desheng & Olson, David L., 2008. "Supply chain risk, simulation, and vendor selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(2), pages 646-655, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:7218-:d:1461655. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.