IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i16p6842-d1453286.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Architecture for Complexity: Speculative Design as Enabler of Engagement in Co-Designing Post-Mining Futures in the Hunter Valley

Author

Listed:
  • Sam Spurr

    (School of Architecture and Built Environment, College of Engineering, Science and Environment, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia)

  • Sandra Carrasco

    (School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Education, Deakin University, Burwood, VIC 3125, Australia)

Abstract

The imminent closure of seventeen mining sites in the Wonnarua Nation in Australia’s Hunter Valley over the next two decades has significant social, cultural, and economic implications. Transitioning to a post-mining future requires integrating rehabilitation efforts with socio-cultural and economic considerations. Speculative design and co-design approaches involving stakeholders from local communities, industry, and government offer alternative solutions for this complex scenario. This paper examines how architects can engage effectively in such transitions by using mixed-methods research, which includes in-class analysis, synthesis and design observation, and qualitative data from student interviews involved in a master’s degree at the architectural design studio exploring the future of a major coal mine in Australia. In contrast to the conventions of assessing “before” and “after” conditions that propose a singular answer to the research, this paper describes the innovative testing of these wicked problems in the setting of the creative design studio. Anticipating the potential for multi-stakeholder co-design processes, the outcomes of this research extend beyond local perspectives. The overarching project, of which this experiment is a key part, aims to identify valuable opportunities for landscape rehabilitation in the Hunter Valley and help to articulate a scalable and replicable process that can be applied to address the environmental challenges faced in other Australian regions. This in-class approach presented the opportunity to rethink and reframe the methods used by reflecting on the interview feedback from students. This can enable students to actively engage in design-based responses to impending mine closure and promote inclusive planning in post-mining landscapes.

Suggested Citation

  • Sam Spurr & Sandra Carrasco, 2024. "Architecture for Complexity: Speculative Design as Enabler of Engagement in Co-Designing Post-Mining Futures in the Hunter Valley," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-20, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6842-:d:1453286
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6842/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/16/6842/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Baer, Hans A., 2016. "The nexus of the coal industry and the state in Australia: Historical dimensions and contemporary challenges," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 194-202.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christian Hauenstein & Franziska Holz & Lennart Rathje & Thomas Mitterecker, 2022. "Stranded Assets in the Coal Export Industry? The Case of the Australian Galilee Basin," Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin 2003, DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research.
    2. Farrelly, M.A. & Tawfik, S., 2020. "Engaging in disruption: A review of emerging microgrids in Victoria, Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    3. Harrahill, Kieran & Douglas, Owen, 2019. "Framework development for ‘just transition’ in coal producing jurisdictions," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Roman Stutzer & Adrian Rinscheid & Thiago D. Oliveira & Pedro Mendes Loureiro & Aya Kachi & Mert Duygan, 2021. "Black coal, thin ice: the discursive legitimisation of Australian coal in the age of climate change," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-9, December.
    5. Swoczyna, Bernard & Karaczun, Zbigniew, 2023. "A mainstay of budget? Coal mining as a source of revenue for Polish local governments," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    6. McGreevy, Dr Michael & MacDougall, Colin & Fisher, Dr Matt & Henley, Mark & Baum, Fran, 2021. "Expediting a renewable energy transition in a privatised market via public policy: The case of south Australia 2004-18," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 148(PA).
    7. Della Bosca, Hannah & Gillespie, Josephine, 2018. "The coal story: Generational coal mining communities and strategies of energy transition in Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 734-740.
    8. Goddard, George & Farrelly, Megan A., 2018. "Just transition management: Balancing just outcomes with just processes in Australian renewable energy transitions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C), pages 110-123.
    9. Salisu, Afees A. & Adediran, Idris A., 2019. "Assessing the inflation hedging potential of coal and iron ore in Australia," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    10. Colvin, R.M. & Przybyszewski, E., 2022. "Local residents' policy preferences in an energy contested region – The Upper Hunter, Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    11. Martin, Nigel & Rice, John, 2019. "Coal Seam Gas projects: Proposed policy model for compensation and benefits sharing," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Mathieu Blondeel & Thijs Van de Graaf, 2018. "Toward a global coal mining moratorium? A comparative analysis of coal mining policies in the USA, China, India and Australia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 89-101, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:16:p:6842-:d:1453286. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.