IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i15p6276-d1440801.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effect of Suppliers’ Green and Traditional Selection Criteria in Supply Chain Management on Purchasing Firms’ Performance

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad Nasser Abuzaid

    (Business Administration Department, School of Business, Mutah University, Alkarak 61710, Jordan)

  • Manal Mohammad Alateeq

    (Business Administration Department, School of Business, Mutah University, Alkarak 61710, Jordan)

  • Saif-aldeen Marwan Madadha

    (Business Administration Department, School of Business, Mutah University, Alkarak 61710, Jordan)

  • Fayiz Emad Addin Al Sharari

    (Department of Administrative and Financial Sciences, Maan College, Al-Balqa Applied University, Ma’an 71110, Jordan)

  • Mohammad Khalaf Alsbou

    (Marketing Department, School of Business, Mutah University, Alkarak 61710, Jordan)

Abstract

In recent years, procurement managers have introduced environmental considerations into supplier selection and evaluation as a response to strict environmental regulations implemented by governments. Although previous research investigated the selection of eco-friendly suppliers, little research has been conducted on the significance of the wide range of selection criteria used by industrial customers. The aim of this study was to address this gap and examine the difference in the perceived importance of the selection criteria versus the performance achieved using the selection criteria, in addition to the difference in the business performance and the total supply performance. By investigating the selection criteria of manufacturers in the market environment, this study aimed to demonstrate how their business performance was affected by the performance of suppliers in relation to such criteria. To accomplish this task, this study conducted an empirical analysis based on the questionnaire responses of 72 purchasing managers working in the electrical/electronic and heavy chemical industries. Based on previous research, the following six supplier selection factors were identified: eco-friendliness, quality, relationship, flexibility, delivery, and price/finance. By using statistical analyses, including sample t -tests and multiple regression analysis, this study identified a correlation between supplier and manufacturer performance. The findings show that some factors, such as eco-friendliness, flexibility, price, and delivery, were statistically relevant to the performance of manufacturers, which added value to the decision-making strategy employed in supplier selection.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad Nasser Abuzaid & Manal Mohammad Alateeq & Saif-aldeen Marwan Madadha & Fayiz Emad Addin Al Sharari & Mohammad Khalaf Alsbou, 2024. "The Effect of Suppliers’ Green and Traditional Selection Criteria in Supply Chain Management on Purchasing Firms’ Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-23, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6276-:d:1440801
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6276/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/15/6276/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Imranul Hoque & Mohammad B. Rana, 2020. "Buyer–supplier relationships from the perspective of working environment and organisational performance: review and research agenda," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 70(1), pages 1-50, February.
    2. Prajogo, Daniel & Chowdhury, Mesbahuddin & Yeung, Andy C.L. & Cheng, T.C.E., 2012. "The relationship between supplier management and firm's operational performance: A multi-dimensional perspective," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(1), pages 123-130.
    3. Patanjal Kumar & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Yigit Kazancoglu & Ali Emrouznejad, 2023. "A decision framework for incorporating the coordination and behavioural issues in sustainable supply chains in digital economy," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 326(2), pages 721-749, July.
    4. Dey, Prasanta Kumar & Bhattacharya, Arijit & Ho, William, 2015. "Strategic supplier performance evaluation: A case-based action research of a UK manufacturing organisation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 192-214.
    5. Piercy, Nigel F. & Katsikeas, Constantine S. & Cravens, David W., 1997. "Examining the role of buyer-seller relationships in export performance," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 32(1), pages 73-86, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Haopeng Chen & Huihui Wang, 2025. "Research on Green Supplier Selection Method Based on Improved AHP-FMEA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-29, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Scott, James & Ho, William & Dey, Prasanta K. & Talluri, Srinivas, 2015. "A decision support system for supplier selection and order allocation in stochastic, multi-stakeholder and multi-criteria environments," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 226-237.
    2. Ghadimi, Pezhman & Ghassemi Toosi, Farshad & Heavey, Cathal, 2018. "A multi-agent systems approach for sustainable supplier selection and order allocation in a partnership supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 269(1), pages 286-301.
    3. Roger Clarke, 2022. "Research opportunities in the regulatory aspects of electronic markets," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(1), pages 179-200, March.
    4. Zahoor, Nadia & Khan, Zaheer & Shenkar, Oded, 2023. "International vertical alliances within the international business field: A systematic literature review and future research agenda," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 58(1).
    5. Irina Makarova & Rifat Khabibullin & Eduard Belyaev & Larisa Gabsalikhova & Eduard Mukhametdinov, 2016. "Improving the Logistical Processes in Corporate Service System," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 11(1), pages 5-18, March.
    6. Dubey, Rameshwar & Gunasekaran, Angappa & Samar Ali, Sadia, 2015. "Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 120-132.
    7. Imre Dobos & Gyöngyi Vörösmarty, 2021. "Supplier selection: comparison of DEA models with additive and reciprocal data," Central European Journal of Operations Research, Springer;Slovak Society for Operations Research;Hungarian Operational Research Society;Czech Society for Operations Research;Österr. Gesellschaft für Operations Research (ÖGOR);Slovenian Society Informatika - Section for Operational Research;Croatian Operational Research Society, vol. 29(2), pages 447-462, June.
    8. Griffith, David A. & Yalcinkaya, Goksel & Calantone, Roger J., 2010. "Do marketing capabilities consistently mediate effects of firm intangible capital on performance across institutional environments?," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 217-227, July.
    9. Aditi & Devika Kannan & Jyoti Dhingra Darbari & P. C. Jha, 2023. "Sustainable supplier selection model with a trade-off between supplier development and supplier switching," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 331(1), pages 351-392, December.
    10. Schillo, R. Sandra & Isabelle, Diane A. & Shakiba, Abtin, 2017. "Linking advanced biofuels policies with stakeholder interests: A method building on Quality Function Deployment," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 126-137.
    11. Elaine Q. Borazon & Vivien T. Supangco, 2018. "Effect of Supply Chain Integration on the Business Performance and Competitiveness of the Philippine Small and Medium Enterprises," Working Papers id:12922, eSocialSciences.
    12. Scott, James A. & Ho, William & Dey, Prasanta K., 2013. "Strategic sourcing in the UK bioenergy industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 478-490.
    13. Antonio CORREIA de BARROS & Hortensia BARANDAS & Paulo Alexandre PIRES, 2009. "Applying Artificial Neural Networks to Evaluate Export Performance: A Relational Approach," REVISTA DE MANAGEMENT COMPARAT INTERNATIONAL/REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL COMPARATIVE MANAGEMENT, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 10(4), pages 713-734, October.
    14. Osiro, Lauro & Lima-Junior, Francisco R. & Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar R., 2014. "A fuzzy logic approach to supplier evaluation for development," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 95-112.
    15. Aijun Liu & Yaxuan Xiao & Xiaohui Ji & Kai Wang & Sang-Bing Tsai & Hui Lu & Jinshi Cheng & Xinjun Lai & Jiangtao Wang, 2018. "A Novel Two-Stage Integrated Model for Supplier Selection of Green Fresh Product," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-23, July.
    16. Akter, Shahriar & Wamba, Samuel Fosso & D’Ambra, John, 2019. "Enabling a transformative service system by modeling quality dynamics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 210-226.
    17. Dongwook Kim & Sungbum Kim, 2017. "Sustainable Supply Chain Based on News Articles and Sustainability Reports: Text Mining with Leximancer and DICTION," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-44, June.
    18. Lima-Junior, Francisco Rodrigues & Carpinetti, Luiz Cesar Ribeiro, 2016. "Combining SCOR® model and fuzzy TOPSIS for supplier evaluation and management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 128-141.
    19. Bashir Baba & Shafie Mohamed Zabri & Ahmed Kaseri Ramin, 2019. "Evaluating the Customer Satisfaction’s Effect on Murabahah and Mudarabah Financing in Islamic Banking," Traektoriâ Nauki = Path of Science, Altezoro, s.r.o. & Dialog, vol. 5(1), pages 2001-2022, January.
    20. Rémy Guichardaz & Laurent Bach & Julien Penin, 2019. "Music industry intermediation in the digital era and the resilience of the Majors’ oligopoly: the role of transactional capability," Industry and Innovation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 26(7), pages 843-869, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:15:p:6276-:d:1440801. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.