IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i14p6110-d1437174.html

Dow Jones Sustainability Indices and ESG Scores: Do They Tell the Same Story?

Author

Listed:
  • Minoo Tehrani

    (Gabelli School of Business, Roger Williams University, Bristol, RI 02809, USA)

  • Andreas Rathgeber

    (Institute of Materials Resource Management, University of Augsburg, 86159 Augsburg, Germany)

  • Edward Dougherty

    (Mathematical Sciences, Salve Regina University, Newport, RI 02840, USA)

  • Lawrence Fulton

    (Boston College, Woods College of Advance Studies, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467, USA)

  • James Fournier

    (Gabelli School of Business, Roger Williams University, Bristol, RI 02809, USA)

Abstract

The focal point of this research is to compare two of the largest global organizations’ sustainability indices and scores, namely Dow Jones Sustainability Indices (DJSIs) and Standard & Poor’s Global (S&P Global) ESG scores (environmental, social, and governance), which rank companies based on their sustainability practices, and to learn if they correspond to each other. Considering that Germany is the hub of large companies from leading global industries, this research compares the ESG scores of the German companies that appear on the Dow Jones Sustainability Indices. Several statistical analyses are conducted to determine if the German companies on the DJSIs correspond with high ESG scores. The years under consideration are 2018 through 2023. The results of this research indicate that DJSIs and ESG scores do not tell the same story and there are discrepancies regarding the sustainability practices of the studied companies that are added to the DJSIs and the assigned high ESG scores by S&P Global.

Suggested Citation

  • Minoo Tehrani & Andreas Rathgeber & Edward Dougherty & Lawrence Fulton & James Fournier, 2024. "Dow Jones Sustainability Indices and ESG Scores: Do They Tell the Same Story?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6110-:d:1437174
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6110/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/6110/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ester Clementino & Richard Perkins, 2021. "How Do Companies Respond to Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) ratings? Evidence from Italy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(2), pages 379-397, June.
    2. Meltem Kılıç & Hasan Emin Gurler & Ahmet Kaya & Chang Won Lee, 2022. "The Impact of Sustainability Performance on Financial Performance: Does Firm Size Matter? Evidence from Turkey and South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-19, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dan Daugaard & Sana Ejaz & Ayobolawole Adewale Ogundipe, 2025. "Greenwashing in the Tuna Industry: Implications for Consumers, Businesses and Planetary Health," Challenges, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-19, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Oehler, Andreas & Neuss, Charlotte, 2025. "ESG disclosure vs. ESG ratings: Consistent information value?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 107(C).
    2. Ersin Yenisu & Sedat Yenice & Diler Türkoğlu, 2026. "Do Sustainability Activities Effect Market Value Linearly or Curvilinearly? A Review of European Banks," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 1003-1015, January.
    3. Jianzhuang Zheng & Muhammad Usman Khurram & Lifeng Chen, 2022. "Can Green Innovation Affect ESG Ratings and Financial Performance? Evidence from Chinese GEM Listed Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-32, July.
    4. Olivier Boiral & Marie‐Christine Brotherton & Léo Rivaud & David Talbot, 2022. "Comparing the uncomparable? An investigation of car manufacturers' climate performance," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(5), pages 2213-2229, July.
    5. Scholz, Robert, 2023. "Unternehmensmitbestimmung und die sozialökologische Transformation: Zusammenhang zwischen Mitbestimmungsindex und ESG-Kriterien in börsennotierten Unternehmen," Mitbestimmungsreport 79, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    6. Helfaya, Akrum & Aboud, Ahmed & Amin, Essam, 2023. "An examination of corporate environmental goals disclosure, sustainability performance and firm value – An Egyptian evidence," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    7. Liu, Xutang & Boubaker, Sabri & Liao, Jing & Yao, Shouyu, 2025. "The rise of common state ownership and corporate environmental performance," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 57(5).
    8. Dunbar, Kwamie & Treku, Daniel & Sarnie, Robert & Hoover, Jack, 2023. "What does ESG risk premia tell us about mutual fund sustainability levels: A difference-in-differences analysis," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 57(C).
    9. Wang, Jianli & Wang, Shaolin & Dong, Minghua & Wang, Hongxia, 2024. "ESG rating disagreement and stock returns: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    10. Massimo Arnone & Carlo Drago & Alberto Costantiello & Angelo Leogrande, 2025. "Political Trust in Italy: How Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors Shape Confidence in Parties," Working Papers hal-04920996, HAL.
    11. Yang, Xinhui & Wang, Chih-Wei & Zhang, Jie & Lin, Weizheng, 2025. "Hometown CEOs and greenwashing: From the perspective of energy consumption," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 826-838.
    12. Juan Oliveros Fontaine & Cristina del Campo & Elena Urquía-Grande, 2024. "What Are Investors Most Interested in about Sustainability? An Approach from the Scientific Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-23, April.
    13. Po‐Sheng Yang & Jin‐Li Hu, 2026. "Intersections Between Digital Innovation and Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence From Listed Electronics Companies in Taiwan," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(2), pages 2705-2736, March.
    14. Ibrahim Mutambik & Abdullah Almuqrin, 2024. "The Best of Both Worlds: How Financial Growth Can Engender Improved Sustainability for Businesses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-23, June.
    15. Tu, Qiang & Zuo, Limei & Liang, Anran & Yao, Ye & Liu, Diyi, 2025. "Does ESG rating divergence decrease enterprise productivity? Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(PB).
    16. Marius Banke & Stephanie Lenger & Christiane Pott, 2022. "ESG Ratings in the Corporate Reporting of DAX40 Companies in Germany: Effects on Market Participants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-21, August.
    17. Edna Aparecida Greggio Possebon & Felippe Aparecido Cippiciani & José Roberto Ferreira Savoia & Frédéric de Mariz, 2024. "ESG Scores and Performance in Brazilian Public Companies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(13), pages 1-18, July.
    18. Weihong Chen & David Diwei Lv & Christina W. Y. Wong, 2023. "Corporate environmental efforts, government environmental subsidies, and corporate non‐environmental R&D intensity: Evidence from listed firms," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 1321-1333, October.
    19. Fiorillo, Paolo & Meles, Antonio & Ricciardi, Antonio & Verdoliva, Vincenzo, 2025. "ESG performance and the cost of debt. Evidence from the corporate bond market," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    20. Elisabet Gómez‐González & Elisa Isabel Cano‐Montero & Jesús Fernando Santos‐Peñalver & Julián Chamizo‐González, 2025. "Disclosure and transparency of sustainability information in Spanish social enterprises: An empirical study of audited special employment centers," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 291-307, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:6110-:d:1437174. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask MDPI Indexing Manager to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.