IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i10p4166-d1395617.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Knowledge Assessment Patterns for Distant Education: The Perceived Impact on Grading, Motivation, and Satisfaction

Author

Listed:
  • Tina Beranič

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, Koroška cesta 46, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia)

  • Marjan Heričko

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, Koroška cesta 46, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia)

  • Luka Pavlič

    (Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Maribor, Koroška cesta 46, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia)

Abstract

With the increase in remote learning, the efficient implementation of distant knowledge assessments has become an essential topic. New challenges have arisen that have had to be adequately addressed and successfully solved. As a response, we introduced an assessment patterns catalogue for distant education, handling various challenges by proposing possible solutions. The catalogue presents a collection of proven practises targeting knowledge assessment in digital and distant environments. The paper presents the survey results from the final step of catalogue creation. The objective was to verify its suitability and expedite its use, focusing on several aspects of knowledge assessment. We focused on the perceived assessment patterns’ impact on grading objectivity and consistency, as well as students’ motivation and satisfaction with an implemented assessment, explored from the students’ and teachers’ perspectives. We gathered data using a uniform questionnaire distributed between students and teachers, both actively involved in distant knowledge assessment. Detailed data analysis highlighted the patterns with the highest perceived impact on the previously mentioned assessment aspects. We also analysed the top-rated patterns within the pattern categories. The results depict a high overlap between students’ and teachers’ perspectives, wherein patterns like Pentathlon, Statistical Validator, Game Rules, and Bonus Points were perceived as the patterns with the highest impact on grading objectivity and consistency, as well as the patterns with the most significant impact on students’ motivation and satisfaction.

Suggested Citation

  • Tina Beranič & Marjan Heričko & Luka Pavlič, 2024. "Knowledge Assessment Patterns for Distant Education: The Perceived Impact on Grading, Motivation, and Satisfaction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-17, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4166-:d:1395617
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4166/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/10/4166/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wahab Ali, 2020. "Online and Remote Learning in Higher Education Institutes: A Necessity in light of COVID-19 Pandemic," Higher Education Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(3), pages 1-16, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luis Miguel Moctezuma Teresa & José Luis Aparicio López & Columba Rodríguez Alviso & Herlinda Gervacio Jiménez & Rosa María Brito Carmona, 2022. "Environmental Competencies for Sustainability: A Training Experience with High School Teachers in a Rural Community," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Ohei Kenneth N, 2023. "Using ICT Tools and Technological Applications in this Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic to Facilitate Learning," HOLISTICA – Journal of Business and Public Administration, Sciendo, vol. 14(2), pages 116-136, December.
    3. Emara, Noha & Atkinson, Mycaeri & Karn, Sumit & Tryon, Tiffany, 2025. "Analyzing non-linear and interactive impacts of distance learning on college enrollment post-COVID-19," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(C), pages 2112-2125.
    4. Katherine C. Aquino & Sally Scott, 2023. "Supporting Students with Disabilities during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Perspective of Disability Resource Professionals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-13, February.
    5. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2b:p:383-393 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Bijoya Saha & Shah Md Atiqul Haq & Khandaker Jafor Ahmed, 2023. "How does the COVID-19 pandemic influence students’ academic activities? An explorative study in a public university in Bangladesh," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-10, December.
    7. Asa Romeo Asa & Davy Julian Du Plessis & Sulaiman Olusegun Atiku, 2024. "Virtual Learning Experiences Among Postgraduate Students in Namibia," International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 10(1), pages 7-22, April.
    8. O’Connor, Jane & Ludgate, Shannon & Le, Quang-Vuong & Le, Huy Thanh & Huynh, Pham Dung Phat, 2023. "Lessons from the pandemic: Teacher educators’ use of digital technologies and pedagogies in Vietnam before, during and after the Covid-19 lockdown," International Journal of Educational Development, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    9. Sunha Kim & Suzanne Rosenblith & Yunjeong Chang & Shira Pollack, 2020. "Will ICMT Access and Use Support URM Students’ Online Learning in the (Post) COVID-19 Era?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-14, October.
    10. David M Beauchamp & Jennifer M Monk, 2022. "Effect of Optional Assessments on Student Engagement, Learning Approach, Stress, and Perceptions of Online Learning during COVID-19," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(5), pages 1-87, October.
    11. Shafi AlDousari, 2023. "Capacities and Obstacles of Kuwait Medical Educational Sector in Transitioning Education System to Online Form: A Paradigm Shift," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 16(12), pages 1-88, February.
    12. Cunying Fan & Juan Wang, 2023. "Undergraduates’ behavioral intention to use indigenous Chinese Web 2.0 tools in informal English learning: Combining language learning motivation with technology acceptance model," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-9, December.
    13. Valentin Kuleto & Milena P. Ilić & Nevenka Popović Šević & Marko Ranković & Dušan Stojaković & Milutin Dobrilović, 2021. "Factors Affecting the Efficiency of Teaching Process in Higher Education in the Republic of Serbia during COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Noé Abraham González-Nieto & Caridad García-Hernández & Margarita Espinosa-Meneses, 2021. "School Culture and Digital Technologies: Educational Practices at Universities within the Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-22, September.
    15. Hannah Njoki, 2021. "Influence Of Technology Type On Development Of Instructional Materials For Distance Education," Journal of Online and Distance Learning, CARI Journals Limited, vol. 1(1), pages 60-74.
    16. Lixuan Sun, 2024. "Translanguaging pedagogy on the digital stage: exploring Chinese undergraduates’ English grammar learning through DingTalk platform," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    17. Susan W. Parker & Mary A. Hansen & Carianne Bernadowski, 2021. "COVID-19 Campus Closures in the United States: American Student Perceptions of Forced Transition to Remote Learning," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    18. Ali Hashemi, 2021. "Previous Studies on The Impact of Online Education in EFL and ESL contexts," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 23(1), pages 177-186, September.
    19. Farooq Abdullah & Sumera Kauser, 2023. "Students’ perspective on online learning during pandemic in higher education," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 57(3), pages 2493-2505, June.
    20. Lu Yu & Meng Du & Xiaohua Zhou, 2023. "E-Service-Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Experiences of Mainland Chinese Students Enrolled at a University in Hong Kong," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-19, June.
    21. Guillermo M. Chans & Mireille E. Bravo-Gutiérrez & Angelica Orona-Navar & Elvia P. Sánchez-Rodríguez, 2022. "Compilation of Chemistry Experiments for an Online Laboratory Course: Student’s Perception and Learning Outcomes in the Context of COVID-19," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-26, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:10:p:4166-:d:1395617. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.