IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i9p7138-d1131825.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How to Measure Sustainability in the Supply Chain Design: An Integrated Proposal from an Extensive and Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Teresa Espinoza Pérez

    (Program for the Development of Sustainable Production Systems (PDSPS), Faculty of Engineering, University of Santiago of Chile, Santiago 9170124, Chile
    Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Santiago of Chile, Santiago 9170124, Chile)

  • Óscar C. Vásquez

    (Program for the Development of Sustainable Production Systems (PDSPS), Faculty of Engineering, University of Santiago of Chile, Santiago 9170124, Chile
    Department of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of Santiago of Chile, Santiago 9170124, Chile)

Abstract

The increase in the world population and resource scarcity has led to the introduction of environmental concepts such as sustainability and sustainable supply chain design (SSCD). However, there is a lack of consensus among researchers on how to measure sustainability in SSCD. Therefore, the authors propose a novel approach to measuring sustainability in the context of SSCD by developing an integrated, tractable, and representative metrics framework. The methodology corresponds to a quantitative approach involving bibliographic examination and statistical techniques. First, the authors conducted a systematic literature review by formulating research questions and a search protocol, searched for relevant articles, and conducted a quality assessment on full-text reviews to obtain metrics for measuring sustainability in SSCD from the literature. Then, they defined aggregation criteria representing their inclusion relationship by merging associated metrics. The authors then used Cluster Analysis (CA), a multivariate statistical technique, for grouping the metrics. Consequently, twelve clusters were distinguished from 541 research articles, grouping 51 metrics from different sustainability dimensions. It shows the strong connection among the sustainability dimensions, i.e., they must be assessed holistically. Then, we proposed reducing the 51 metrics to 5 to evaluate sustainability in the SSCD, allowing us to focus on a reduced number of indicators.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Teresa Espinoza Pérez & Óscar C. Vásquez, 2023. "How to Measure Sustainability in the Supply Chain Design: An Integrated Proposal from an Extensive and Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-57, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7138-:d:1131825
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7138/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/9/7138/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. K Soylu & J C Dumville, 2011. "Design for environment: The greening of product and supply chain," Maritime Economics & Logistics, Palgrave Macmillan;International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME), vol. 13(1), pages 29-43, March.
    2. I.M. Coelho & P.L.A. Munhoz & L.S. Ochi & M.J.F. Souza & C. Bentes & R. Farias, 2016. "An integrated CPU--GPU heuristic inspired on variable neighbourhood search for the single vehicle routing problem with deliveries and selective pickups," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(4), pages 945-962, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schryen, Guido, 2020. "Parallel computational optimization in operations research: A new integrative framework, literature review and research directions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 1-18.
    2. Thays A. Oliveira & Yuri B. Gabrich & Helena Ramalhinho & Miquel Oliver & Miri W. Cohen & Luiz S. Ochi & Serigne Gueye & Fábio Protti & Alysson A. Pinto & Diógenes V. M. Ferreira & Igor M. Coelho & Vi, 2020. "Mobility, Citizens, Innovation and Technology in Digital and Smart Cities," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-27, January.
    3. Tseng, Po-Hsing & Pilcher, Nick, 2019. "Evaluating the key factors of green port policies in Taiwan through quantitative and qualitative approaches," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 127-137.
    4. Malte Schäfer & Manuel Löwer, 2020. "Ecodesign—A Review of Reviews," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-33, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:9:p:7138-:d:1131825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.