IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p6851-d1126945.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How China’s Ecological Compensation Policy Improves Farmers’ Income?—A Test of Environmental Effects

Author

Listed:
  • Hong Sun

    (School of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Feng Dai

    (School of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

  • Wenxing Shen

    (School of Economics and Management, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

Abstract

Based on the quasi-natural experiment established in China’s national key ecological function areas, this paper takes 102 counties in Hebei Province, China, from 2014 to 2018 as the research object. It uses propensity score matching and difference-in-difference methods to investigate the impact of policy implementation on farmers’ income levels and constructs a mechanism using the air quality index to examine the environmental effect. The results show that when the time and regional fixed effects are not considered, the income level of farmers in the county increased by 3.11% due to the influence of the transfer payment policy, and the policy treatment effect grew over time. Among the control variables, the degree of industrialization and agriculturalization, urbanization rate and government financial scale were all positively related to farmers’ income. Controlling the fixed effects of region and year, the impact of policy on the improvement of farmers’ income was weakened, and the regression coefficient changed from 0.2211 to 0.0366, a drop of 83.45%. This suggests that the policy is greatly affected by the city where farmers live. The “environmental effect” test results showed that transfer payments could increase the income level of farmers in counties affected by the policy. The mechanism is that the priority measure of the ecological compensation policy is to improve the ecological environment, which is conducive to improving local environmental governance and environmental productivity and increasing crop yields, and thus increasing farmers’ incomes. Because the regions where the policy is implemented overlap with highly poverty-stricken areas, it is necessary for the central government to improve transfer payment standards and enrich their content to protect people’s livelihood while promoting ecological protection. As a result, local governments will be encouraged to act ecologically, vigorously develop local ecological industries, and promote the internalization of positive externalities in ecological environmental services, further improving the level of agricultural modernization and ecological sustainability and improving the income levels of farmers and their quality of life.

Suggested Citation

  • Hong Sun & Feng Dai & Wenxing Shen, 2023. "How China’s Ecological Compensation Policy Improves Farmers’ Income?—A Test of Environmental Effects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6851-:d:1126945
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6851/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6851/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Pu & Poe, Gregory L. & Wolf, Steven A., 2017. "Payments for Ecosystem Services and Wealth Distribution," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 63-68.
    2. Mingyue Li & Pujie Zhao & Lianbei Wu & Kai Chen, 2021. "Effects of Value Perception, Environmental Regulation and Their Interaction on the Improvement of Herdsmen’s Grassland Ecological Policy Satisfaction," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-23, March.
    3. Qi Wen & Jie Fang & Xia Li & Fang Su, 2022. "Impact of Ecological Compensation on Farmers’ Livelihood Strategies in Energy Development Regions in China: A Case Study of Yulin City," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, June.
    4. Yan Liu & Zhu Qian & Han Kong & Ran Wu & Pengfei Zheng & Wenyi Qin, 2023. "Impacts of Eco-Poverty Alleviation Policies on Farmer Livelihood Changes and Response Mechanisms in a Karst Area of China from a Sustainable Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, February.
    5. Emi Uchida & Jintao Xu & Scott Rozelle, 2005. "Grain for Green: Cost-Effectiveness and Sustainability of China’s Conservation Set-Aside Program," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 81(2).
    6. Jiang, Yanan & Guan, Dongjie & He, Xiujuan & Yin, Boling & Zhou, Lilei & Sun, Lingli & Huang, Danan & Li, Zihui & Zhang, Yanjun, 2022. "Quantification of the coupling relationship between ecological compensation and ecosystem services in the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    7. Kemkes, Robin J. & Farley, Joshua & Koliba, Christopher J., 2010. "Determining when payments are an effective policy approach to ecosystem service provision," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(11), pages 2069-2074, September.
    8. Alberto Abadie & David Drukker & Jane Leber Herr & Guido W. Imbens, 2004. "Implementing matching estimators for average treatment effects in Stata," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 4(3), pages 290-311, September.
    9. Bingtao Qin & Yongwei Yu & Liming Ge & Le Yang & Yuanguo Guo, 2022. "Does Eco-Compensation Alleviate Rural Poverty? New Evidence from National Key Ecological Function Areas in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(17), pages 1-21, September.
    10. Pengfei Cheng & Jie Li & Hongli Zhang & Guanghua Cheng, 2023. "Sustainable Management Behavior of Farmland Shelterbelt of Farmers in Ecologically Fragile Areas: Empirical Evidence from Xinjiang, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-16, January.
    11. Xin Zhang & Xinling Zhang, 2022. "Total Factor Productivity of Herdsmen Animal Husbandry in Pastoral Areas: Regional Differences and Driving Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    12. Jie Pang & Leshan Jin & Yujie Yang & Heng Li & Zongling Chu & Fei Ding, 2022. "Policy Cognition, Household Income and Farmers’ Satisfaction: Evidence from a Wetland Ecological Compensation Project in the Poyang Lake Area at the Micro Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-14, September.
    13. Hongjie Cao & Meina Li & Fengqin Qin & Yankun Xu & Li Zhang & Zhifeng Zhang, 2022. "Economic Development, Fiscal Ecological Compensation, and Ecological Environment Quality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(8), pages 1-19, April.
    14. Wunder, Sven & Engel, Stefanie & Pagiola, Stefano, 2008. "Taking stock: A comparative analysis of payments for environmental services programs in developed and developing countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(4), pages 834-852, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sun, Hong & Cheng, Nanyang & Zhang, Renjian & Shen, Wenxing & Miao, Chunxia, 2024. "Repression or promotion? Transfer payments, ecological constraints, and enterprise development," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    2. Yonghua Zhang & Xue Wang & Shenwei Wan & Hongge Zhu, 2023. "Fuzzy Set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of the Factors Affecting Satisfaction with the Policy of Ecological Forest Rangers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-18, April.
    3. Smith, Helen F. & Sullivan, Caroline A., 2014. "Ecosystem services within agricultural landscapes—Farmers' perceptions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 72-80.
    4. Jennifer M. Alix-Garcia & Elizabeth N. Shapiro & Katharine R. E. Sims, 2012. "Forest Conservation and Slippage: Evidence from Mexico’s National Payments for Ecosystem Services Program," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 88(4), pages 613-638.
    5. Sattler, Claudia & Trampnau, Susanne & Schomers, Sarah & Meyer, Claas & Matzdorf, Bettina, 2013. "Multi-classification of payments for ecosystem services: How do classification characteristics relate to overall PES success?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 31-45.
    6. Xiekui Zhang & Lijun Wu & Zefeng Zhang, 2024. "Does Air Quality Ecological Compensation Improve Total Factor Energy Efficiency?—A Quasi-Natural Experiment from 282 Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
    7. Jian Zhang & Tao Tian & Jinying Cui & Gordon M. Hickey & Rui Zhou & Jianguo Liu & Youcai Xiong, 2021. "Sustainability Evaluation on the Grain to Green Program in the Hexi Corridor of China: A Metacoupled System Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-13, February.
    8. Kristin Nicolaus & Jens Jetzkowitz, 2014. "How Does Paying for Ecosystem Services Contribute to Sustainable Development? Evidence from Case Study Research in Germany and the UK," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(5), pages 1-24, May.
    9. Yan, Haiming & Yang, Huicai & Guo, Xiaonan & Zhao, Shuqin & Jiang, Qun'ou, 2022. "Payments for ecosystem services as an essential approach to improving ecosystem services: A review," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    10. Hao Li & Michael T Bennett & Xuemei Jiang & Kebin Zhang & Xiaohui Yang, 2017. "Rural Household Preferences for Active Participation in “Payment for Ecosystem Service” Programs: A Case in the Miyun Reservoir Catchment, China," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-21, January.
    11. García-Amado, Luis Rico & Pérez, Manuel Ruiz & Escutia, Felipe Reyes & García, Sara Barrasa & Mejía, Elsa Contreras, 2011. "Efficiency of Payments for Environmental Services: Equity and additionality in a case study from a Biosphere Reserve in Chiapas, Mexico," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(12), pages 2361-2368.
    12. Wallander, Steven & Hellerstein, Daniel M. & Johnsen, Reid, "undated". "Cost Effectiveness of Conservation Auctions Revisited: The Benefits of Information Rents," 2018 Annual Meeting, August 5-7, Washington, D.C. 274457, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    13. Suhardiman, Diana & Wichelns, Dennis & Lestrelin, Guillaume & Thai Hoanh, Chu, 2013. "Payments for ecosystem services in Vietnam: Market-based incentives or state control of resources?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 5(C), pages 94-101.
    14. Suhardiman, Diana & Wichelns, Dennis & Lestrelin, Guillaume & Hoanh, Chu Thai, 2013. "Payments for ecosystem services in Vietnam: market-based incentives or state control of resources?," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 6(C), pages 64-71.
    15. Cheng Chen & Hannes J. König & Bettina Matzdorf & Lin Zhen, 2015. "The Institutional Challenges of Payment for Ecosystem Service Program in China: A Review of the Effectiveness and Implementation of Sloping Land Conversion Program," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-28, May.
    16. Liu, Ping & Yin, Runsheng & Zhao, Minjuan, 2019. "Reformulating China's ecological restoration policies: What can be learned from comparing Chinese and American experiences?," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 54-61.
    17. Sheng, Jichuan & Wang, Hui, 2022. "Participation, income growth and poverty alleviation in payments for ecosystem services: The case of China's Wolong Nature Reserve," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    18. Chan, Kai M.A. & Anderson, Emily & Chapman, Mollie & Jespersen, Kristjan & Olmsted, Paige, 2017. "Payments for Ecosystem Services: Rife With Problems and Potential—For Transformation Towards Sustainability," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 110-122.
    19. Chen, Haojie & Sloggy, Matthew R. & Evans, Samuel, 2025. "How land property rights affect the effectiveness of payment for ecosystem services: A review," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    20. Bauchet, Jonathan & Asquith, Nigel & Ma, Zhao & Radel, Claudia & Godoy, Ricardo & Zanotti, Laura & Steele, Diana & Gramig, Benjamin M. & Chong, Andrea Estrella, 2020. "The practice of Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) in the Tropical Andes: Evidence from program administrators," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6851-:d:1126945. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.