IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i8p6796-d1126252.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Determination of Conservation–Reuse Parameters for Industrial Heritage Sustainability and a Decision-Making Model Proposal

Author

Listed:
  • Şebnem Ertaş Beşir

    (Faculty of Architecture, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07070, Türkiye)

  • Meryem Elif Çelebi Karakök

    (Faculty of Architecture, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07070, Türkiye)

Abstract

This study aims to determine the necessary parameters to ensure sustainable conservation in the adaptive reuse of industrial heritage and create a decision-making model. This study included the selection of the sample industrial heritage, determining the necessary parameters, percentage frequency analysis (PFA) of the industrial heritages in relation to the parameters, interpreting the percentage frequency results by comparing them, and developing the decision-making model. The decisions of the architectural heritage conservation organizations ICOMOS, TICCIH, and UNESCO were used to determine the conservation parameters. The reuse parameters were determined based on sustainability principles, since the adaptive reuse of historical buildings is also the subject of sustainability. The obtained parameters were converted to percentage values after being made numerically significant by two different percentage frequency analyses: conservation and reuse. Each sample used in the model was considered successful in various sources, rewarded, and praised in the literature and media. If we accept 50% as an average value, there are only four industrial heritages which are over 50% for the conservation percentage frequency analysis, but there are nine industrial heritages which are over 50% for the reuse percentage frequency analysis. On the other hand, it is written in the article that the aim is to catch 100%. Therefore, maybe it can be said that we cannot only conserve, but also fail to use. The model developed in this study will serve as a guide in establishing the conservation –use balance of project decisions as well as in objectively evaluating current practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Şebnem Ertaş Beşir & Meryem Elif Çelebi Karakök, 2023. "Determination of Conservation–Reuse Parameters for Industrial Heritage Sustainability and a Decision-Making Model Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-27, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6796-:d:1126252
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6796/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/8/6796/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. María V. Añibarro & María J. Andrade & Eduardo Jiménez-Morales, 2023. "A Multicriteria Approach to Adaptive Reuse of Industrial Heritage: Case Studies of Riverside Power Plants," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-24, January.
    2. Ayşegül Durukan & Şebnem Ertaş Beşir & Selver Koç Altuntaş & Mikail Açıkel, 2021. "Evaluation of Sustainability Principles in Adaptable Re-Functioning: Traditional Residences in Demirel Complex," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Vizzarri, Corrado & Sangiorgio, Valentino & Fatiguso, Fabio & Calderazzi, Antonella, 2021. "A holistic approach for the adaptive reuse project selection: The case of the former Enel power station in Bari," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    4. R.M. Ball, 2002. "Re use potential and vacant industrial premises: revisiting the regeneration issue in Stoke-on-Trent," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 93-110, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antonello Monsù Scolaro & Stefania De Medici, 2021. "Downcycling and Upcycling in Rehabilitation and Adaptive Reuse of Pre-Existing Buildings: Re-Designing Technological Performances in an Environmental Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Roberta Ingaramo & Luca Pascale, 2020. "An Interpretative Matrix for an Adaptive Design Approach. Italian School Infrastructure: Safety and Social Restoration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-22, October.
    3. Naai-Jung Shih & Yu-Chen Wu, 2023. "Hydrogeography-Based Fabric Assessment of Heritage Warehouses," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-26, January.
    4. Sunny Han Han & Huimin Zhang, 2022. "Progress and Prospects in Industrial Heritage Reconstruction and Reuse Research during the Past Five Years: Review and Outlook," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, November.
    5. Jagarajan, Rehmaashini & Abdullah Mohd Asmoni, Mat Naim & Mohammed, Abdul Hakim & Jaafar, Mohd Nadzri & Lee Yim Mei, Janice & Baba, Maizan, 2017. "Green retrofitting – A review of current status, implementations and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 1360-1368.
    6. Serena Viola, 2022. "Built Heritage Repurposing and Communities Engagement: Symbiosis, Enabling Processes, Key Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. João Pedro Costa & Maria J. Andrade & Francesca Dal Cin, 2023. "The (Re)Industrialised Waterfront as a “Fluid Territory”: The Case of Lisbon and the Tagus Estuary," Urban Planning, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(3), pages 363-375.
    8. Sara J. Wilkinson & Kimberley James, 2011. "The potential for sustainable retrofit in Premium office buildings in the Central Business District," ERES eres2011_195, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    9. Sara J. Wilkinson, 2013. "Sustainable Retrofit in CBD: Contemporary Practices in Melbourne," ERES eres2013_2, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    10. Jiazhen Zhang & Jeremy Cenci & Vincent Becue & Sesil Koutra & Chenyang Liao, 2022. "Stewardship of Industrial Heritage Protection in Typical Western European and Chinese Regions: Values and Dilemmas," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-16, May.
    11. Serena Viola & Donatella Diano, 2019. "Repurposing the Built Environment: Emerging Challenges and Key Entry Points for Future Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(17), pages 1-19, August.
    12. Paleologos, Evan K. & Caratelli, Paolo & Amrousi, Mohamed El, 2016. "Waste-to-energy: An opportunity for a new industrial typology in Abu Dhabi," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 1260-1266.
    13. Alessandra Bianchi & Stefania De Medici, 2023. "A Sustainable Adaptive Reuse Management Model for Disused Railway Cultural Heritage to Boost Local and Regional Competitiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-34, March.
    14. Roberta Ingaramo & Isabella M. Lami & Matteo Robiglio, 2022. "How to Activate the Value in Existing Stocks through Adaptive Reuse: An Incremental Architecture Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-15, May.
    15. Beser Oktay Vehbi & Kağan Günçe & Aminreza Iranmanesh, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Assessment for Defining Compatible New Use: Old Administrative Hospital, Kyrenia, Cyprus," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, February.
    16. In Kwon Park & Burkhard von Rabenau, 2015. "Tax delinquency and abandonment: An expanded model with application to industrial and commercial properties," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 52(5), pages 857-875, April.
    17. Stefania De Medici, 2021. "Italian Architectural Heritage and Photovoltaic Systems. Matching Style with Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    18. Hilde T. Remøy & Sara J. Wilkinson, 2011. "Sustainability and office building conversions: A comparison of Dutch and Australian practices," ERES eres2011_46, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    19. Francesca Nocca & Mariarosaria Angrisano, 2022. "The Multidimensional Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Regeneration Projects: A Proposal for Integrating Level(s) Tool—The Case Study of Villa Vannucchi in San Giorgio a Cremano (Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-27, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:8:p:6796-:d:1126252. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.