IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i5p2514-d506266.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluation of Sustainability Principles in Adaptable Re-Functioning: Traditional Residences in Demirel Complex

Author

Listed:
  • Ayşegül Durukan

    (Department of Interior Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07070, Turkey)

  • Şebnem Ertaş Beşir

    (Department of Interior Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07070, Turkey)

  • Selver Koç Altuntaş

    (Department of Interior Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon 61080, Turkey)

  • Mikail Açıkel

    (Department of Interior Architecture, Faculty of Architecture, Akdeniz University, Antalya 07070, Turkey)

Abstract

Sustainable living is basically being able to construct the balance of protecting and using natural resources. In this way, the heritage value transferred to future generations is formed by the interaction of people and the environment. This is also very important for “architecture”, which expresses sustainability and is an important tool. In addition to the continuity of sustainable architecture and cultural heritage, it is possible to create economic resources and detect sociological data. Local architecture, which bridges the past and the present and best reveals the relationship of people with each other and their environment, has a place in many parts of the world with its rich diversity. Local architecture has an active place in contemporary society with its cultural, socio-economic and concrete identity values. These structures are protected by various strategies and methods and transferred to future generations. One of these methods is adaptive re-use. Within the scope of adaptive re-use, the study examined the principles of sustainability through eight second-degree registered İslamköy residences in the Demirel Complex of İslamköy village in Atabey district of Isparta province in Turkey. Thus, by evaluating three basic principles, environmental, economic and social, in terms of the continuity of local architecture with the sub-parameters determined, it was aimed to reveal the benefits and damages caused by the complex to the settlement in terms of sustainability. In this way, the change and transformation created by re-functioning with the renewal of building materials and typology was examined.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayşegül Durukan & Şebnem Ertaş Beşir & Selver Koç Altuntaş & Mikail Açıkel, 2021. "Evaluation of Sustainability Principles in Adaptable Re-Functioning: Traditional Residences in Demirel Complex," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-23, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2514-:d:506266
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2514/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/5/2514/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Magdalena Celadyn, 2019. "Interior Architectural Design for Adaptive Reuse in Application of Environmental Sustainability Principles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Louise Ellison & Sarah Sayce & Judy Smith, 2007. "Socially Responsible Property Investment: Quantifying the Relationship between Sustainability and Investment Property Worth," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 24(3), pages 191-219, September.
    3. Hung-Ming Tu, 2020. "The Attractiveness of Adaptive Heritage Reuse: A Theoretical Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-15, March.
    4. Carlo Antonio Stival & Raul Berto & Pierluigi Morano & Paolo Rosato, 2020. "Reuse of Vernacular Architecture in Minor Alpine Settlements: A Multi-Attribute Model for Sustainability Appraisal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-27, August.
    5. Jiae Han & Soomi Kim, 2018. "Heritage Value through Regeneration Strategy in Mapo Cultural Oil Depot, Seoul," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-18, September.
    6. Jungwon Yoon & Jiyoung Park, 2015. "Comparative Analysis of Material Criteria in Neighborhood Sustainability Assessment Tools and Urban Design Guidelines: Cases of the UK, the US, Japan, and Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-38, October.
    7. Mareba M. Scott & Andrew J. Frew, 2013. "Exploring the Role of In-Trip Applications for Sustainable Tourism: Expert Perspectives," Springer Books, in: Lorenzo Cantoni & Zheng (Phil) Xiang (ed.), Information and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2013, edition 127, pages 36-46, Springer.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Şebnem Ertaş Beşir & Meryem Elif Çelebi Karakök, 2023. "Determination of Conservation–Reuse Parameters for Industrial Heritage Sustainability and a Decision-Making Model Proposal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-27, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jungwon Yoon & Jihye Lee, 2019. "Adaptive Reuse of Apartments as Heritage Assets in the Seoul Station Urban Regeneration Area," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-31, June.
    2. Hung-Ming Tu, 2020. "Sustainable Heritage Management: Exploring Dimensions of Pull and Push Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-17, October.
    3. Arum Park & Jungho Jun & Kyoung Jun Lee, 2017. "Customer-Driven Smart and Sustainable Interactions in Conventions: The Case of Nestlé’s Smart Button Adoption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-13, November.
    4. Marco Gola & Marta Dell’Ovo & Stefano Scalone & Stefano Capolongo, 2022. "Adaptive Reuse of Social and Healthcare Structures: The Case Study as a Research Strategy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Deniz Ikiz Kaya & Nadia Pintossi & Gamze Dane, 2021. "An Empirical Analysis of Driving Factors and Policy Enablers of Heritage Adaptive Reuse within the Circular Economy Framework," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-24, February.
    6. Soomi Kim & Hyun-ah Kwon, 2020. "Sustainable Regeneration through the Cultural Conversion of Urban Heritage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Tom Kauko, 2013. "A Demonstration of Sustainability Arguments Using House Price Data," ERES eres2013_146, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    8. Nappi-Choulet, Ingrid & Décamps, Aurélien, 2011. "Is Sustainability Attractive for Corporate Real Estate Decisions ?," ESSEC Working Papers WP1106, ESSEC Research Center, ESSEC Business School.
    9. Giuseppe T. Cirella & Alessio Russo, 2019. "Special Issue Sustainable Interdisciplinarity: Human–Nature Relations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-5, December.
    10. Yasmine Sabry Hegazi & Heidi Ahmed Shalaby & Mady A. A. Mohamed, 2021. "Adaptive Reuse Decisions for Historic Buildings in Relation to Energy Efficiency and Thermal Comfort—Cairo Citadel, a Case Study from Egypt," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-26, September.
    11. Jeongah Kim & Wookjae Heo, 2021. "Importance of Interior Design: An Environmental Mediator for Perceiving Life Satisfaction and Financial Stress," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-15, September.
    12. Elena Rudan, 2023. "Circular Economy of Cultural Heritage—Possibility to Create a New Tourism Product through Adaptive Reuse," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-12, March.
    13. Stanislav Avsec & Magdalena Jagiełło-Kowalczyk, 2021. "Investigating Possibilities of Developing Self-Directed Learning in Architecture Students Using Design Thinking," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-25, April.
    14. Matthew Cohen, 2017. "A Systematic Review of Urban Sustainability Assessment Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-16, November.
    15. Oluwatobi Mary Owojori & Chioma Sylvia Okoro & Nicholas Chileshe, 2021. "Current Status and Emerging Trends on the Adaptive Reuse of Buildings: A Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-17, October.
    16. Eunyoung Kim & Eunkyoung Hwang, 2017. "Analysis of the Current Scoring Distribution by Evaluation Criteria in Korean Long-Life Housing Certification System Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-20, October.
    17. Graeme Newell & Zaharah Manaf, 2008. "The Significance of Sustainability Practices by the Malaysian Property Sector," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 23(3), pages 152-167, August.
    18. Wenjun Jiao & Xiao Yang & Qingwen Min, 2022. "A Review of the Progress in Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems (GIAHS) Monitoring," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-16, August.
    19. Tom Kauko, 2014. "Innovation in real estate and evolutionary agendas," ERES eres2014_15, European Real Estate Society (ERES).
    20. Ingrid Nappi-Choulet & Aurélien Decamps, 2012. "The impact of energy efficiency and green performance on the value of corporate real estate portfolios," ERES eres2012_145, European Real Estate Society (ERES).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:2514-:d:506266. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.