IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i6p5127-d1096749.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Sustainable Adaptive Reuse Management Model for Disused Railway Cultural Heritage to Boost Local and Regional Competitiveness

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandra Bianchi

    (Bologna Business School (BBS), Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna, 40136 Bologna, Italy)

  • Stefania De Medici

    (Department of Civil Engineering and Architecture (DICAR), University of Catania, 96100 Siracusa, Italy)

Abstract

Building reuse is a strategy for built heritage enhancement. The establishment of new activities in an existing building can have positive effects on the urban and territorial context and modify the dynamics of socio-economic development. If the reuse is considered as a cultural development strategy and not limited to a single building but to both buildings and infrastructures, these effects are amplified. This is the case of railway heritage, affected by an increasingly vast process of abandonment. The Italian policies for encouraging road transport and the communication models of the digital era have contributed to the gradual desertion of railway lines. This requires effective reuse models, to avoid that the Ferrovie dello Stato (State Railways) continue to carry the heavy burden of managing assets no longer able to generate income. The analysis of numerous station reuse cases, at an international level, lead to the selection of the case of the Postal Museum and Mail Ride in London as an example of good practice. The proposed methodology identifies a set of evaluation criteria and indicators to assess the effectiveness of adaptive reuse projects both in terms of their ability to protect built heritage identity and to modify the orientation of the territorial context’s development towards socio-economic sustainability guidelines.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandra Bianchi & Stefania De Medici, 2023. "A Sustainable Adaptive Reuse Management Model for Disused Railway Cultural Heritage to Boost Local and Regional Competitiveness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-34, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5127-:d:1096749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5127/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/6/5127/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Santagata, Walter, 2006. "Cultural Districts and Their Role in Developed and Developing Countries," Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, in: V.A. Ginsburgh & D. Throsby (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Art and Culture, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 31, pages 1101-1119, Elsevier.
    2. Pratt, Andy C., 2008. "Cultural commodity chains, cultural clusters, or cultural production chains?," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 20713, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Bottero, Marta & Oppio, Alessandra & Bonardo, Martina & Quaglia, Giulia, 2019. "Hybrid evaluation approaches for urban regeneration processes of landfills and industrial sites: the case of the Kwun Tong area in Hong Kong," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 585-594.
    4. Roberto Sañudo & Rohit Raj Goswami & Stefano Ricci & Marina Miranda, 2022. "Efficient Reuse of Railway Track Waste Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-25, September.
    5. Esser, Klaus & Hillebrand, Wolfgang & Messner, Dirk & Meyer-Stamer, Jörg, 1996. "Systemic competitiveness: a new challenge for firms and for government," Revista CEPAL, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL), August.
    6. Andy C. Pratt, 2008. "Cultural Commodity Chains, Cultural Clusters, or Cultural Production Chains?," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(1), pages 95-103, March.
    7. Karl Aiginger, 2006. "Competitiveness: From a Dangerous Obsession to a Welfare Creating Ability with Positive Externalities," Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, Springer, vol. 6(2), pages 161-177, June.
    8. Pan Jiang & Long Shao & Christopher Baas, 2019. "Interpretation of Value Advantage and Sustainable Tourism Development for Railway Heritage in China Based on the Analytic Hierarchy Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-17, November.
    9. Thomas Dyllick & Kai Hockerts, 2002. "Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 11(2), pages 130-141, March.
    10. Francesca Nocca, 2017. "The Role of Cultural Heritage in Sustainable Development: Multidimensional Indicators as Decision-Making Tool," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(10), pages 1-28, October.
    11. R.M. Ball, 2002. "Re use potential and vacant industrial premises: revisiting the regeneration issue in Stoke-on-Trent," Journal of Property Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 19(2), pages 93-110, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dušan Ristić & Danijela Vukoičić & Marko Ivanović & Milena Nikolić & Nikola Milentijević & Ljiljana Mihajlović & Dragan Petrović, 2024. "Transformation of Abandoned Railways into Tourist Itineraries/Routes: Model of Revitalization of Marginal Rural Areas," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-28, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ferdinand, Nicole & Williams, Nigel L., 2013. "International festivals as experience production systems," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 202-210.
    2. Sofia Vilarinho & Henri Christiaans, 2020. "Identity Building Through Mediation by African Tailors," International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(5), pages 841-856, September.
    3. Jean-Paul Simon & Pierre-Jean Benghozi & Elisa Salvador, 2015. "The new middlemen of the digital age: the case of cinema," Post-Print hal-02522184, HAL.
    4. Oakley, Kate & Laurison, Daniel & O'Brien, Dave & Friedman, Sam, 2017. "Cultural capital: arts graduates, spatial inequality, and London's impact on cultural labour market," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 84366, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Gary A S Cook & Naresh R Pandit & Jonathan V Beaverstock, 2011. "Cultural and Economic Complementarities of Spatial Agglomeration in the British Television Broadcasting Industry: Some Explorations," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 43(12), pages 2918-2933, December.
    6. Francesca Nocca & Mariarosaria Angrisano, 2022. "The Multidimensional Evaluation of Cultural Heritage Regeneration Projects: A Proposal for Integrating Level(s) Tool—The Case Study of Villa Vannucchi in San Giorgio a Cremano (Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-27, September.
    7. Ioana Gutu & Daniela Tatiana Agheorghiesei & Alexandru Tugui, 2023. "Assessment of a Workforce Sustainability Tool through Leadership and Digitalization," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-30, January.
    8. Jung Eon Kwon & Hyung Rok Woo, 2017. "The Impact of Flipped Learning on Cooperative and Competitive Mindsets," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Rambaud, Alexandre & Richard, Jacques, 2015. "The “Triple Depreciation Line” instead of the “Triple Bottom Line”: Towards a genuine integrated reporting," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 92-116.
    10. Maria Björklund & Helena Forslund, 2019. "Challenges Addressed by Swedish Third-Party Logistics Providers Conducting Sustainable Logistics Business Cases," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-15, May.
    11. Merriam Haffar & Cory Searcy, 2018. "Target‐setting for ecological resilience: Are companies setting environmental sustainability targets in line with planetary thresholds?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(7), pages 1079-1092, November.
    12. Pishchulov, Grigory & Trautrims, Alexander & Chesney, Thomas & Gold, Stefan & Schwab, Leila, 2019. "The Voting Analytic Hierarchy Process revisited: A revised method with application to sustainable supplier selection," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 166-179.
    13. Mara Del Baldo & Maria-Gabriella Baldarelli, 2017. "Renewing and improving the business model toward sustainability in theory and practice," International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Per Engelseth & Richard Glavee-Geo & Artur Janusz & Enoch Niboi, 2020. "The Emergent Nature of Networked Sustainable Procurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Izabela Mlynarzewska-Borowiec, 2022. "Digital Competitiveness Gap between the US and EU Member States in the 21st Century," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(4), pages 364-380.
    16. Francesco Di Maddaloni & Roya Derakhshan, 2019. "A Leap from Negative to Positive Bond. A Step towards Project Sustainability," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-19, June.
    17. Alessio D’Auria & Pasquale De Toro & Nicola Fierro & Elisa Montone, 2018. "Integration between GIS and Multi-Criteria Analysis for Ecosystem Services Assessment: A Methodological Proposal for the National Park of Cilento, Vallo di Diano and Alburni (Italy)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-25, September.
    18. Simone Carmine & Valentina De Marchi, 2023. "Reviewing Paradox Theory in Corporate Sustainability Toward a Systems Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(1), pages 139-158, April.
    19. Bert Scholtens & Feng‐Ching Kang, 2013. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Earnings Management: Evidence from Asian Economies," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 20(2), pages 95-112, March.
    20. Hsueh, Che-Fu, 2014. "Improving corporate social responsibility in a supply chain through a new revenue sharing contract," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 214-222.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:6:p:5127-:d:1096749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.