IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i5p4489-d1085983.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Costs of Soil Erosion to Crop Production in Canada between 1971 and 2015

Author

Listed:
  • Nasem Badreldin

    (Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Science, University of Manitoba, 13 Freedman Crescent, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada)

  • David A. Lobb

    (Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Science, University of Manitoba, 13 Freedman Crescent, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada)

Abstract

Canada is known for its massive and fertile landscape, and one of the biggest industries in Canada is crop production, which is responsible for contributing to the national economy as well as the global food supply. Soil erosion is considered the top challenge facing Canadian farmers in the 21st century. This study aims to evaluate soil erosion’s impact on Canadian crop production, assessed based on the integration of soil erosion analysis and multitemporal crop market values from 1971 to 2015. Soil Erosion Risk Indicator models were used to assess soil erosion’s impact on crop productivity using the relationship of soil organic carbon with crop yield gain/loss. The total soil erosion cost of yield losses in the 44 years leading up to 2015 is estimated to be CAD 33.51 billion. 2013 was found to show the highest loss, with CAD 1.93 billion. Oilseeds, small grains, and potatoes were the major crop commodities that were impacted by yield loss as a direct result of soil erosion, the costs being 41%, 37%, and 15%, respectively. Ontario and Saskatchewan were the most impacted provinces, with costs of 45.25% and 22.50%, respectively. Four eras were detected in this research, each having unique soil erosion costs, which reflect different agriculture policy and soil conservation efforts: Era 1 (1971–1988), Era 2 (1989–1995), Era 3 (1996–2007), and Era 4 (2008–2015). This research is the beginning of exploring the cost of the environmental impacts on agriculture sustainability in Canada and supporting decision makers in adopting effective soil conservation strategies to mitigate these impacts.

Suggested Citation

  • Nasem Badreldin & David A. Lobb, 2023. "The Costs of Soil Erosion to Crop Production in Canada between 1971 and 2015," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4489-:d:1085983
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4489/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/5/4489/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sartori, Martina & Philippidis, George & Ferrari, Emanuele & Borrelli, Pasquale & Lugato, Emanuele & Montanarella, Luca & Panagos, Panos, 2019. "A linkage between the biophysical and the economic: Assessing the global market impacts of soil erosion," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 299-312.
    2. Barbier,Edward B., 2011. "Capitalizing on Nature," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9781107007277.
    3. Yuxin Ma & Budiman Minasny & Valérie Viaud & Christian Walter & Brendan Malone & Alex McBratney, 2023. "Modelling the Whole Profile Soil Organic Carbon Dynamics Considering Soil Redistribution under Future Climate Change and Landscape Projections over the Lower Hunter Valley, Australia," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-20, January.
    4. D. A. Rennie, 1985. "Soil Degradation, A Western Perspective," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 33, pages 19-29, April.
    5. Nkonya, Ephraim M. & Mirzabaev, Alisher & von Braun, Joachim, 2015. "Synopsis, Economics of land degradation and improvement: A global assessment for sustainable development:," Issue briefs 90, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. D. A. Rennie, 1985. "Soil Degradation, A Western Perspective," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 33(s1), pages 19-29, April.
    7. Wen, Xiaojie & Yao, Shunbo & Sauer, Johannes, 2022. "Shadow prices and abatement cost of soil erosion in Shaanxi Province, China: Convex expectile regression approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Panos Panagos & Pasquale Borrelli & David Robinson, 2020. "FAO calls for actions to reduce global soil erosion," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 25(5), pages 789-790, May.
    2. Barbier , Edward B., 2020. "From Limits to Growth to Planetary Boundaries: The Evolution of Economic Views on Natural Resource Scarcity," 2020 Conference (64th), February 12-14, 2020, Perth, Western Australia 305259, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    3. Matthias Blum & Eoin McLaughlin & Nick Hanley, 2019. "Accounting for Sustainable Development over the Long‐Run: Lessons from Germany," German Economic Review, Verein für Socialpolitik, vol. 20(4), pages 410-446, November.
    4. Wen, Xiaojie & Yao, Shunbo & Sauer, Johannes, 2022. "Shadow prices and abatement cost of soil erosion in Shaanxi Province, China: Convex expectile regression approach," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    5. Amandine Valérie Pastor & Joao Pedro Nunes & Rossano Ciampalini & Haithem Bahri & Mohamed Annabi & Mohamed Chikhaoui & Armand Crabit & Stéphane Follain & Jan Jacob Keizer & Jérôme Latron & Feliciana L, 2022. "ScenaLand: a simple methodology for developing land use and management scenarios," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 27(8), pages 1-29, December.
    6. Christie, Michael & Colombo, Sergio & Hanley, Nicholas, 2011. "What are the consequences of ignoring attributes in choice experiments? An application to ecosystem service values," Stirling Economics Discussion Papers 2011-20, University of Stirling, Division of Economics.
    7. Kvamsdal, Sturla F. & Sandal, Leif K. & Poudel, Diwakar, 2020. "Ecosystem wealth in the Barents Sea," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    8. Ruth Zárate-Rueda & Yolima Ivonne Beltrán-Villamizar & Daniella Murallas-Sánchez, 2021. "Social representations of socioenvironmental dynamics in extractive ecosystems and conservation practices with sustainable development: a bibliometric analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(11), pages 16428-16453, November.
    9. Toman Michael, 2014. "The need for multiple types of information to inform climate change assessment," Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis, De Gruyter, vol. 5(3), pages 469-485, December.
    10. Anna Thoms & Stephan Köster, 2022. "Potentials for Sponge City Implementation in Sub-Saharan Africa," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-21, September.
    11. A. S. Strokov & V. S. Krasilnikova & O. V. Cherkasova, 2022. "Economic Valuation of Recovery and Increased Efficiency in Agricultural Land Use," Studies on Russian Economic Development, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 447-454, August.
    12. Qin Liu & Tiange Shi, 2019. "Spatiotemporal Differentiation and the Factors of Ecological Vulnerability in the Toutun River Basin Based on Remote Sensing Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-19, August.
    13. Kathleen Brüssow & Anja Faße & Ulrike Grote, 2017. "Is Sustainable Intensification Pro-Poor? Evidence from Small-Scale Farmers in Rural Tanzania," Resources, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-16, September.
    14. Carina B. Colman & Paulo Tarso S. Oliveira & André Almagro & Britaldo S. Soares-Filho & Dulce B. B. Rodrigues, 2019. "Effects of Climate and Land-Cover Changes on Soil Erosion in Brazilian Pantanal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Adam P. Hejnowicz & Murray A. Rudd, 2017. "The Value Landscape in Ecosystem Services: Value, Value Wherefore Art Thou Value?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-34, May.
    16. Yanyan Li & Jinbing Zhang & Hui Zhu & Zhimin Zhou & Shan Jiang & Shuangyan He & Ying Zhang & Yicheng Huang & Mengfan Li & Guangrui Xing & Guanghui Li, 2023. "Soil Erosion Characteristics and Scenario Analysis in the Yellow River Basin Based on PLUS and RUSLE Models," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-19, January.
    17. Edward B. Barbier & Joanne C. Burgess, 2021. "Institutional Quality, Governance and Progress towards the SDGs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-11, October.
    18. Eckehard Rosenbaum, 2017. "Green Growth—Magic Bullet or Damp Squib?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-18, June.
    19. Tamba, Yvonne & Wafula, Joshua & Whitney, Cory & Luedeling, Eike & Yigzaw, Negusse & Negussie, Aklilu & Muchiri, Caroline & Gebru, Yemane & Shepherd, Keith & Aynekulu, Ermias, 2021. "Stochastic simulation of restoration outcomes for a dry afromontane forest landscape in northern Ethiopia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    20. Ashenafi Yimam Kassaye & Guangcheng Shao & Xiaojun Wang & Marye Belete, 2022. "Evaluating the practices of climate-smart agriculture sustainability in Ethiopia using geocybernetic assessment matrix," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(1), pages 724-764, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:5:p:4489-:d:1085983. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.