IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p3071-d1061551.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Performance of the Construction of a Water Ecological Civilization City: International Assessment and Comparison

Author

Listed:
  • Qimeng Yue

    (College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    School of GeoSciences, The University of Edinburgh, Crew Building, Alexander Crum Brown Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FF, UK)

  • Kate Heal

    (School of GeoSciences, The University of Edinburgh, Crew Building, Alexander Crum Brown Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FF, UK)

  • Jingshan Yu

    (College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Qianyang Wang

    (College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Yuexin Zheng

    (College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Zhanliang Zhu

    (College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
    School of GeoSciences, The University of Edinburgh, Crew Building, Alexander Crum Brown Road, Edinburgh EH9 3FF, UK)

  • Yuan Liu

    (State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycle in River Basin, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, China)

  • Shugao Xu

    (College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

  • Xiaolei Yao

    (College of Water Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)

Abstract

The water ecological environment problems brought about by rapid urbanization have prompted the proposal and implementation of different approaches to urban water ecological construction, such as eco-cities, best management practices (BMPs), and low-impact development (LID). As one of the most representative urban water ecological management policies in China, the Water Ecological Civilization City (WECC) was proposed in 2013, and 105 cities were selected for pilot construction. Many studies have evaluated the effectiveness of WECC construction, but international quantitative comparison is lacking. To address this, an urban Water-Human-Health (WHH) Assessment Model, considering water resources, ecological environment, economic and social development level, and water resources utilization, was developed and applied to five WECC pilot cities in China and 10 other cities worldwide, in which mainstream urban water ecological construction modes have been used. Principal component analysis of the index values in the assessment system was used to evaluate the current status of water ecosystem health in the 15 cities, showing that Sydney, Cleveland, and Hamburg were the most advanced in urban water ecological management. The two cities with the best evaluation results (Sydney and Cleveland), and the WECC city with the highest score (Wuhan) were selected for documentary analysis of their water ecological construction documents to identify similarities and differences to inform best practice internationally for urban water ecological construction. The results showed that Sydney and Cleveland attach similar emphasis across most constituents of urban water ecological construction, while, for Wuhan, greater importance is attached to water resource management and water culture. The advantages and disadvantages of WECC construction and international experience are discussed. The WHH assessment model proposed in this study provides a new quantitative evaluation method for international urban water ecological health evaluation, which could be further improved by including an urban flood risk indicator.

Suggested Citation

  • Qimeng Yue & Kate Heal & Jingshan Yu & Qianyang Wang & Yuexin Zheng & Zhanliang Zhu & Yuan Liu & Shugao Xu & Xiaolei Yao, 2023. "The Performance of the Construction of a Water Ecological Civilization City: International Assessment and Comparison," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3071-:d:1061551
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3071/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/3071/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Omid Seyedashraf & Andrea Bottacin-Busolin & Julien J. Harou, 2021. "Many-Objective Optimization of Sustainable Drainage Systems in Urban Areas with Different Surface Slopes," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(8), pages 2449-2464, June.
    2. Maycon Sedrez & Jing Xie & Ali Cheshmehzangi, 2021. "Integrating Water Sensitive Design in the Architectural Design Studio in China: Challenges and Outcomes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-22, April.
    3. Joseí E. Castro & Maria Kaika & Erik Swyngedouw, 2003. "London: Structural Continuities and Institutional Change in Water Management," European Planning Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(3), pages 283-298.
    4. Yang, Qiuyue & Gao, Da & Song, Deyong & Li, Yi, 2021. "Environmental regulation, pollution reduction and green innovation: The case of the Chinese Water Ecological Civilization City Pilot policy," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 45(4).
    5. Ana Luiza Melo Rodrigues & Demetrius David Silva & Frederico Carlos Martins Menezes Filho, 2021. "Methodology for Allocation of Best Management Practices Integrated with the Urban Landscape," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 35(4), pages 1353-1371, March.
    6. Henry Kaiser, 1958. "The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 23(3), pages 187-200, September.
    7. Daxue Kan & Wenqing Yao & Lianju Lyu & Weichiao Huang, 2022. "Temporal and Spatial Difference Analysis and Impact Factors of Water Ecological Civilization Level: Evidence from Jiangxi Province, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Miguel Rodrigues & Carla Antunes, 2021. "Best Management Practices for the Transition to a Water-Sensitive City in the South of Portugal," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-27, March.
    9. Simon Joss & Arthur P. Molella, 2013. "The Eco-City as Urban Technology: Perspectives on Caofeidian International Eco-City (China)," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(1), pages 115-137, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lianju Lyu & Daxue Kan & Wenqing Yao & Weichiao Huang, 2022. "Has China’s Pilot Policy of Water Ecological Civilization City Construction Reduced Water Pollution Intensity?," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.
    2. Bonhomme, Stphane & Robin, Jean-Marc, 2009. "Consistent noisy independent component analysis," Journal of Econometrics, Elsevier, vol. 149(1), pages 12-25, April.
    3. Fernando Castelló-Sirvent & Pablo Pinazo-Dallenbach, 2021. "Corruption Shock in Mexico: fsQCA Analysis of Entrepreneurial Intention in University Students," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(14), pages 1-31, July.
    4. Rodríguez-Fuentes, Carlos Javier & Hernández-López, Montserrat, 1997. "Análisis de diferencias estructurales interregionales determinantes en el impacto de la política monetaria," Estudios de Economia Aplicada, Estudios de Economia Aplicada, vol. 7, pages 141-157, Junio.
    5. Enrico Ivaldi, 2013. "Proposal of a country risk index based on a factorial analysis - Una proposta di indice di rischio paese basato sull’analisi fattoriale: una applicazione ai paesi del sud del Mediterraneo e ai paesi d," Economia Internazionale / International Economics, Camera di Commercio Industria Artigianato Agricoltura di Genova, vol. 66(2), pages 231-249.
    6. De Nicola, Arianna & Gitto, Simone & Mancuso, Paolo, 2013. "Airport quality and productivity changes: A Malmquist index decomposition assessment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 67-75.
    7. Kornelia Przestrzelska & Katarzyna Wartalska & Weronika Rosińska & Jakub Jurasz & Bartosz Kaźmierczak, 2024. "Climate Resilient Cities: A Review of Blue-Green Solutions Worldwide," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 38(15), pages 5885-5910, December.
    8. Iara Oliveira Fernandes & José Fernandes de Melo Filho & Karolina Oliveira Rocha Montenegro & Ésio de Castro Paes & Sergio Ricardo Matos Almeida & João Albany Costa & Franceli da Silva, 2024. "Physical and Chemical Attributes of Yellow Oxisol With the Application of Cassava Wastewater After Intensive Mechanical Preparation," Journal of Agricultural Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(6), pages 113-113, April.
    9. Ponzoa, José M. & Gómez, Andrés & Mas, José M., 2023. "EU27 and USA institutions in the digital ecosystem: Proposal for a digital presence measurement index," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    10. Thomas Despois & Catherine Doz, 2023. "Identifying and interpreting the factors in factor models via sparsity: Different approaches," Journal of Applied Econometrics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 38(4), pages 533-555, June.
    11. Xia Vivian Zhou & Kimberly L. Jensen & James A. Larson & Burton C. English, 2021. "Farmer Interest in and Willingness to Grow Pennycress as an Energy Feedstock," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-16, April.
    12. Matkovskyy, Roman & Bouraoui, Taoufik & Hammami, Helmi, 2016. "Analysing the financial strength of Tunisia: An approach to estimate an index of financial safety," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 485-493.
    13. Zhice Cheng & Xinyuan Chen & Huwei Wen, 2022. "How Does Environmental Protection Tax Affect Corporate Environmental Investment? Evidence from Chinese Listed Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, March.
    14. Chuanbo Shen & Solomon Asante-Okyere & Yao Yevenyo Ziggah & Liang Wang & Xiangfeng Zhu, 2019. "Group Method of Data Handling (GMDH) Lithology Identification Based on Wavelet Analysis and Dimensionality Reduction as Well Log Data Pre-Processing Techniques," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-16, April.
    15. Jhon Lennon Bezerra da Silva & Marcos Vinícius da Silva & Pabrício Marcos Oliveira Lopes & Rodrigo Couto Santos & Ailton Alves de Carvalho & Geber Barbosa de Albuquerque Moura & Thieres George Freire , 2025. "Land Use and Land Cover Change Patterns from Orbital Remote Sensing Products: Spatial Dynamics and Trend Analysis in Northeastern Brazil," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-38, September.
    16. repec:osf:socarx:49qxk_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Metaxas, Theodore & Kallioras, Dimitris, 2013. "Small and medium-sized firms' competitiveness and territorial characteristics/assets: The cases of Bari, Varna and Thessaloniki," MPRA Paper 52446, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Donald R. Epley, 2001. "US Real Estate Agent Income and Commercial/Investment Activities," Journal of Real Estate Research, American Real Estate Society, vol. 21(3), pages 221-244.
    19. Christiane Riedinger & Jackie Campbell & William M P Klein & Rebecca A Ferrer & Juliet A Usher-Smith, 2022. "Analysis of the components of cancer risk perception and links with intention and behaviour: A UK-based study," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(1), pages 1-16, January.
    20. Han Zhu & Aili Zhang, 2024. "The Impact of Water Resource Tax Reform on Green Technology Innovation: Evidence from Chinese A-Share Listed Enterprises," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(4), pages 17630-17648, December.
    21. Suranjan Sinha & Surajit Chakraborty & Shatrajit Goswami, 2017. "Ecological footprint: an indicator of environmental sustainability of a surface coal mine," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 807-824, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:3071-:d:1061551. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.