IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i4p2910-d1059212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Untangling the Additive and Multiplicative Relations between Natural Scenery Exposure and Human–Animal Interaction on Affective Well-Being: Evidence from Daily Diary Studies

Author

Listed:
  • Adalia Y. H. Goh

    (School of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, Singapore 179873, Singapore)

  • Shu Min Chia

    (School of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, Singapore 179873, Singapore)

  • Nadyanna M. Majeed

    (Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119077, Singapore)

  • Nicole R. Y. Chen

    (School of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, Singapore 179873, Singapore)

  • Andree Hartanto

    (School of Social Sciences, Singapore Management University, Singapore 179873, Singapore)

Abstract

Built nature spaces have been increasingly integrated into our urban environments in recent years with the aim of reaping their psychological benefits. However, despite numerous works of research on the relationship between nature exposure and well-being, most studies have looked into the benefits of well-being from the lens of isolated elements of nature, such as natural scenery or animal exposure. This study aims to fill in the gaps by examining the additive and multiplicative relationships between natural scenery exposure and human–animal interaction on affective well-being (i.e., positive affect, negative affect, and stress) through a daily diary study. Over seven days, natural scenery exposure, human–animal interactions, and affective well-being of 514 young adults were assessed. Through multilevel modelling, we found that natural scenery exposure was associated with increased positive affect at the within- and between-person levels. Moreover, human–animal interaction was associated with increased positive affect at the within-person level. No evidence was found for human–animal interaction as a moderator of the relationship between natural scenery exposure and affective well-being. Our findings support the additive, but not multiplicative, relations between natural scenery exposure and human–animal interactions on their influence on affective well-being. The exploratory analysis showed the lack of multiplicative relationship which can be attributed to the distinct mechanism of the effect between natural scenery exposure and human–animal interactions on affective well-being.

Suggested Citation

  • Adalia Y. H. Goh & Shu Min Chia & Nadyanna M. Majeed & Nicole R. Y. Chen & Andree Hartanto, 2023. "Untangling the Additive and Multiplicative Relations between Natural Scenery Exposure and Human–Animal Interaction on Affective Well-Being: Evidence from Daily Diary Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:2910-:d:1059212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/2910/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/4/2910/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lara S. Franco & Danielle F. Shanahan & Richard A. Fuller, 2017. "A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-29, August.
    2. Migle Baceviciene & Rasa Jankauskiene, 2022. "The Mediating Effect of Nature Restorativeness, Stress Level, and Nature Connectedness in the Association between Nature Exposure and Quality of Life," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(4), pages 1-15, February.
    3. Lucy E. Keniger & Kevin J. Gaston & Katherine N. Irvine & Richard A. Fuller, 2013. "What are the Benefits of Interacting with Nature?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-23, March.
    4. Bates, Douglas & Mächler, Martin & Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve, 2015. "Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 67(i01).
    5. Rosseel, Yves, 2012. "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i02).
    6. Christie Scollon & Chu Kim-Prieto & Ed Diener, 2003. "Experience Sampling: Promises and Pitfalls, Strengths and Weaknesses," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 4(1), pages 5-34, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Qiang Wen & Haiqiang Liu & Jinyuan Chen & Huiyao Ye & Zeyu Pan, 2023. "Evaluation of Satisfaction with the Built Environment of University Buildings under the Epidemic and Its Impact on Student Anxiety," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Giofrè, D. & Allen, K. & Toffalini, E. & Mammarella, I.C. & Caviola, S., 2022. "Decoding gender differences: Intellectual profiles of children with specific learning disabilities," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    3. Lissy Fehnker & Diane Pearson & Peter Howland, 2022. "Informing Future Land Systems Using Self-Reported Pathways and Barriers to Connections to Nature: A Case Study in Auckland, New Zealand," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-18, October.
    4. repec:cup:judgdm:v:14:y:2019:i:3:p:349-363 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Pinar Celik & Martin Storme & Nils Myszkowski, 2022. "Individual Differences in Within-Person Variability in Personality Positively Predict Economic Gains and Satisfaction in Negotiations," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(3), pages 683-702, June.
    6. Angel M. Dzhambov & Peter Lercher & Drozdstoy Stoyanov & Nadezhda Petrova & Stoyan Novakov & Donka D. Dimitrova, 2021. "University Students’ Self-Rated Health in Relation to Perceived Acoustic Environment during the COVID-19 Home Quarantine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-21, March.
    7. repec:cup:judgdm:v:15:y:2020:i:6:p:1024-1036 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Mengyuan Qiu & Ji Sha & Noel Scott, 2021. "Restoration of Visitors through Nature-Based Tourism: A Systematic Review, Conceptual Framework, and Future Research Directions," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Nima Khalighinejad & Neil Garrett & Luke Priestley & Patricia Lockwood & Matthew F. S. Rushworth, 2021. "A habenula-insular circuit encodes the willingness to act," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Samuel Drempetic & Christian Klein & Bernhard Zwergel, 2020. "The Influence of Firm Size on the ESG Score: Corporate Sustainability Ratings Under Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(2), pages 333-360, November.
    11. Pfund, Gabrielle N. & DeLongis, Anita & Sin, Nancy & Morstead, Talia & Hill, Patrick L., 2022. "Being active for a purpose: Evaluating the bi-directional associations between monthly purpose and physical activity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).
    12. Guo, Liang & Decoster, Stijn & Babalola, Mayowa T. & De Schutter, Leander & Garba, Omale A. & Riisla, Katrin, 2018. "Authoritarian leadership and employee creativity: The moderating role of psychological capital and the mediating role of fear and defensive silence," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 219-230.
    13. John A. Aitken & Amber Sprenger & Balca Alaybek & Grace Mika & Halene Hartman & Laura Leets & Ellyn Maese & Telli Davoodi, 2024. "Surveys and Diaries and Scales, Oh My! A Critical Analysis of Household Food Waste Measurement," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-18, January.
    14. Nicolas Pellerin & Michael Dambrun & Eric Raufaste, 2022. "Selflessness Meets Higher and More Stable Happiness: An Experience Sampling Study of the Joint Dynamics of Selflessness and Happiness," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 23(6), pages 3127-3142, August.
    15. Monica E. Ellwood-Lowe & Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli & Silvia A. Bunge, 2021. "Brain network coupling associated with cognitive performance varies as a function of a child’s environment in the ABCD study," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-14, December.
    16. Anton M. Potapov & Carlos A. Guerra & Johan Hoogen & Anatoly Babenko & Bruno C. Bellini & Matty P. Berg & Steven L. Chown & Louis Deharveng & Ľubomír Kováč & Natalia A. Kuznetsova & Jean-François Pong, 2023. "Globally invariant metabolism but density-diversity mismatch in springtails," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-13, December.
    17. Field, Andy Peter Professor & Wilcox, Rand R., 2017. "Robust statistical methods: a primer for clinical psychology and experimental psychopathology researchers," OSF Preprints v3nz4, Center for Open Science.
    18. Jacob Lund Orquin & Jacob Dalgaard Christensen & Carl-Johan Lagerkvist, 2020. "A meta-analytical and experimental examination of blood glucose effects on decision making under risk," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 15(6), pages 1024-1036, November.
    19. Cristina Velasco & Javier López & Gema Pérez-Rojo & Cristina Noriega & José Ángel Martínez-Huertas, 2022. "The Revised Memory and Behavior Problems Checklist for Nursing Homes: Validation among Different Spanish Territories," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-11, February.
    20. Thomas Schultze & Andreas Mojzisch & Stefan Schulz-Hardt, 2019. "Why dyads heed advice less than individuals do," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 14(3), pages 349-363, May.
    21. Stefan Stieger & David Lewetz & Viren Swami, 2021. "Emotional Well-Being Under Conditions of Lockdown: An Experience Sampling Study in Austria During the COVID-19 Pandemic," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 22(6), pages 2703-2720, August.
    22. Jain, Aditya & Torres, Luis D. & Teoh, Kevin & Leka, Stavroula, 2022. "The impact of national legislation on psychosocial risks on organisational action plans, psychosocial working conditions, and employee work-related stress in Europe," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 302(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:2910-:d:1059212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.