IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i3p1823-d1039454.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Civic Reporting Indicators and Biocultural Conservation: Opportunities and Challenges for Sustainable Tourism

Author

Listed:
  • Julia R. Branstrator

    (Human Dimensions of Natural Resources Department, Warner College of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA)

  • Christina T. Cavaliere

    (Human Dimensions of Natural Resources Department, Warner College of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523, USA)

  • Jonathon Day

    (White Lodging-J.W. Marriott, Jr. School of Hospitality and Tourism Management, College of Health and Human Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA)

  • Kelly S. Bricker

    (Department of Parks, Recreation, and Tourism, College of Health, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA)

Abstract

Citizen science (CS) within sustainable tourism is an underutilized tool for biocultural conservation. The aims of this research integrate conceptual and applied approaches to situate post-positivist and interpretive paradigms within CS and sustainable tourism. The aims are fulfilled by the creation of the new Civic Reporting Indicators (CRIs), developed through analysis of the 174 Global Sustainable Tourism Council Destination (GSTC-D) criteria and indicators. It was determined that 114 indicators are perceivable audibly and/or visibly by untrained citizens. The rearticulation of GSTC-D criteria into the CRIs utilizes embodied perceptions and observations reportable by untrained visitors and residents. The CRIs are framed within ethical principles of research, CS, and sustainable tourism. The inclusion of interpretive paradigms within CS provides epistemological innovation that validates lived experiences and embodied knowledge, fostering agency and empowerment within sustainability narratives. The CRIs may harness end-user observations by utilizing information communication technologies (ICTs) to amass longitudinal and real-time data for smart, sustainable destination management and biocultural conservation. Engaging citizens through the CRIs has the potential to contribute valid observations that amass democratic, longitudinal, and cost-effective data. Designing accessible ICT platforms for destination management may enact civic agency and critical social reflection to democratize sustainability engagement.

Suggested Citation

  • Julia R. Branstrator & Christina T. Cavaliere & Jonathon Day & Kelly S. Bricker, 2023. "Civic Reporting Indicators and Biocultural Conservation: Opportunities and Challenges for Sustainable Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1823-:d:1039454
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1823/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/3/1823/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sauermann, Henry & Vohland, Katrin & Antoniou, Vyron & Balázs, Bálint & Göbel, Claudia & Karatzas, Kostas & Mooney, Peter & Perelló, Josep & Ponti, Marisa & Samson, Roeland & Winter, Silvia, 2020. "Citizen science and sustainability transitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(5).
    2. Brosnan, Tess & Filep, Sebastian & Rock, Jenny, 2015. "Exploring synergies: Hopeful tourism and citizen science," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 96-98.
    3. Justus Henke, 2022. "Can Citizen Science in the Humanities and Social Sciences Deliver on the Sustainability Goals?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, July.
    4. Adam Gouraguine & Joan Moranta & Ana Ruiz-Frau & Hilmar Hinz & Olga Reñones & Sebastian C A Ferse & Jamaluddin Jompa & David J Smith, 2019. "Citizen science in data and resource-limited areas: A tool to detect long-term ecosystem changes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Alejandra Tauro & Jaime Ojeda & Terrance Caviness & Kelli P. Moses & René Moreno-Terrazas & T. Wright & Danqiong Zhu & Alexandria K. Poole & Francisca Massardo & Ricardo Rozzi, 2021. "Field Environmental Philosophy: A Biocultural Ethic Approach to Education and Ecotourism for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, April.
    6. Mohammad Tipu Sultan & Farzana Sharmin & Alina Badulescu & Elena Stiubea & Ke Xue, 2020. "Travelers’ Responsible Environmental Behavior towards Sustainable Coastal Tourism: An Empirical Investigation on Social Media User-Generated Content," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Farrukh Rafiq & Mohd Adil & Mohd Sadiq, 2022. "Does Contextual Factor Influence Travelers’ Towel Reuse Behavior? Insights from Circular Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Nolan, Anne & Hoy, Aislinn, 2023. "Clean Air Together Dublin: Impact on air quality awareness, attitudes and behaviour," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number SUSTAT120.
    3. Freiling, Isabelle & Matthes, Jörg, 2024. "Redefining the boundaries of citizen social science to avoid a repackaging of common social science methods," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    4. Sarita Albagli & Allan Yu Iwama, 2022. "Citizen science and the right to research: building local knowledge of climate change impacts," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    5. Nicola Moczek & Silke L. Voigt-Heucke & Kim G. Mortega & Claudia Fabó Cartas & Jörn Knobloch, 2021. "A Self-Assessment of European Citizen Science Projects on Their Contribution to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    6. Mindel, Vitali & Overstreet, Robert E. & Sternberg, Henrik & Mathiassen, Lars & Phillips, Nelson, 2024. "Digital activism to achieve meaningful institutional change: A bricolage of crowdsourcing, social media, and data analytics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    7. Mercy Gloria Ashepet & Liesbet Vranken & Caroline Michellier & Olivier Dewitte & Rodgers Mutyebere & Clovis Kabaseke & Ronald Twongyirwe & Violet Kanyiginya & Grace Kagoro-Rugunda & Tine Huyse & Liesb, 2024. "Assessing scale reliability in citizen science motivational research: lessons learned from two case studies in Uganda," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    8. Justus Henke, 2022. "Can Citizen Science in the Humanities and Social Sciences Deliver on the Sustainability Goals?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, July.
    9. Woodson, Thomas S. & Hoffmann, Elina & Boutilier, Sophia, 2021. "Evaluating the NSF broader impacts with the Inclusion-Immediacy Criterion: A retrospective analysis of nanotechnology grants," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    10. Michał Wróblewski & Joanna Suchomska & Katarzyna Tamborska, 2021. "Citizens or Consumers? Air Quality Sensor Users and Their Involvement in Sensor.Community. Results from Qualitative Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
    11. Abbate, Stefano & Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto, 2023. "The digital and sustainable transition of the agri-food sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    12. Paivi Abernethy & Katriina Soini & Joy Ommer & Janne Artell & Titta Tapiola & Antonio Parodi, 2025. "Reframing Citizen Participation: Turning Barriers into Guiding Enablers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-21, September.
    13. Beck, Susanne & Brasseur, Tiare-Maria & Poetz, Marion & Sauermann, Henry, 2022. "Crowdsourcing research questions in science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).
    14. Josephine Berndt & Sandra Nitz, 2023. "Learning in Citizen Science: The Effects of Different Participation Opportunities on Students’ Knowledge and Attitudes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Khaled M. Aboalganam & Sakher Faisal AlFraihat & Saeed Tarabieh, 2025. "The Impact of User-Generated Content on Tourist Visit Intentions: The Mediating Role of Destination Imagery," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-15, March.
    16. Yiyang Sun & Guolin Hou, 2021. "Analysis on the Spatial-Temporal Evolution Characteristics and Spatial Network Structure of Tourism Eco-Efficiency in the Yangtze River Delta Urban Agglomeration," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-29, March.
    17. Cristian Alarcon Ferrari & Mari Jönsson & Solomon Gebreyohannis Gebrehiwot & Linley Chiwona-Karltun & Cecilia Mark-Herbert & Daniela Manuschevich & Neil Powell & Thao Do & Kevin Bishop & Tuija Hilding, 2021. "Citizen Science as Democratic Innovation That Renews Environmental Monitoring and Assessment for the Sustainable Development Goals in Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-9, March.
    18. Hardy, Anne & Young, Tamara & Cheer, Joseph & Scheyvens, Regina & Movono, Apisalome, 2022. "Humanising research: A citizen social science agenda," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    19. Kyle M. Woosnam & Marianna Strzelecka & Gwendelyn S. Nisbett & Samuel J. Keith, 2019. "Examining Millennials’ Global Citizenship Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions to Engage in Environmental Volunteering," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-18, April.
    20. Anders Brostrom & Cornelia Lawson & Mabel Sanchez Barrioluengo, 2024. "Are scientists perceived as credible experts?," MIOIR Working Paper Series 2024-04, The Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR), The University of Manchester.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:3:p:1823-:d:1039454. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.