IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v13y2021i20p11406-d657282.html

Citizens or Consumers? Air Quality Sensor Users and Their Involvement in Sensor.Community. Results from Qualitative Case Study

Author

Listed:
  • Michał Wróblewski

    (Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Faculty of Sociology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, 87-100 Toruń, Poland)

  • Joanna Suchomska

    (Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Faculty of Sociology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, 87-100 Toruń, Poland)

  • Katarzyna Tamborska

    (Department of Philosophy and Social Sciences, Faculty of Sociology, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, 87-100 Toruń, Poland)

Abstract

This article presents the results of the qualitative research conducted on Polish users of the Sensor.Community network. Different types of motivation behind the decision to engage in the collection of air quality data are discussed. Users’ motives have been found to result predominantly from the concern for the health and safety of their loved ones, as well as the need to control air quality (and ultimately the quality of life) in their immediate environment (home and neighbourhood). Users do not display civic behaviour such as working for the local community. Three factors have been proposed to explain this status quo. First, the motives related to health and safety, as opposed to motives behind seeking a resolution to an environmental problem at the local level, may contribute to the solidification of individualistic attitudes. Second, Sensor.Community is organised in a way that does not promote a greater involvement from the network organisers in the development of the initiative and retention of users. Instead, the network focuses predominantly on the technical aspects of operation. Third, users have no sense of agency as, in our opinion, they remain largely unaware of the value of the data they collect.

Suggested Citation

  • Michał Wróblewski & Joanna Suchomska & Katarzyna Tamborska, 2021. "Citizens or Consumers? Air Quality Sensor Users and Their Involvement in Sensor.Community. Results from Qualitative Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(20), pages 1-15, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11406-:d:657282
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11406/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/20/11406/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sauermann, Henry & Vohland, Katrin & Antoniou, Vyron & Balázs, Bálint & Göbel, Claudia & Karatzas, Kostas & Mooney, Peter & Perelló, Josep & Ponti, Marisa & Samson, Roeland & Winter, Silvia, 2020. "Citizen science and sustainability transitions," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 49(5).
    2. Aisling Irwin, 2018. "No PhDs needed: how citizen science is transforming research," Nature, Nature, vol. 562(7728), pages 480-482, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Georgios Samourgkanidis & Kostantis Varvatsoulis & Dimitris Kouzoudis, 2021. "The Effect of the Thermal Annealing Process to the Sensing Performance of Magnetoelastic Ribbon Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(24), pages 1-10, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Beck, Susanne & Brasseur, Tiare-Maria & Poetz, Marion & Sauermann, Henry, 2022. "Crowdsourcing research questions in science," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(4).
    2. World Bank Group, 2023. "Mobilizing Private Finance for Nature," World Bank Publications - Reports 40393, The World Bank Group.
    3. Nolan, Anne & Hoy, Aislinn, 2023. "Clean Air Together Dublin: Impact on air quality awareness, attitudes and behaviour," Research Series, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI), number SUSTAT120.
    4. Freiling, Isabelle & Matthes, Jörg, 2024. "Redefining the boundaries of citizen social science to avoid a repackaging of common social science methods," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    5. Sarita Albagli & Allan Yu Iwama, 2022. "Citizen science and the right to research: building local knowledge of climate change impacts," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    6. Nicola Moczek & Silke L. Voigt-Heucke & Kim G. Mortega & Claudia Fabó Cartas & Jörn Knobloch, 2021. "A Self-Assessment of European Citizen Science Projects on Their Contribution to the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Mindel, Vitali & Overstreet, Robert E. & Sternberg, Henrik & Mathiassen, Lars & Phillips, Nelson, 2024. "Digital activism to achieve meaningful institutional change: A bricolage of crowdsourcing, social media, and data analytics," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(3).
    8. Mercy Gloria Ashepet & Liesbet Vranken & Caroline Michellier & Olivier Dewitte & Rodgers Mutyebere & Clovis Kabaseke & Ronald Twongyirwe & Violet Kanyiginya & Grace Kagoro-Rugunda & Tine Huyse & Liesb, 2024. "Assessing scale reliability in citizen science motivational research: lessons learned from two case studies in Uganda," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Julia R. Branstrator & Christina T. Cavaliere & Jonathon Day & Kelly S. Bricker, 2023. "Civic Reporting Indicators and Biocultural Conservation: Opportunities and Challenges for Sustainable Tourism," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Justus Henke, 2022. "Can Citizen Science in the Humanities and Social Sciences Deliver on the Sustainability Goals?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-20, July.
    11. Woodson, Thomas S. & Hoffmann, Elina & Boutilier, Sophia, 2021. "Evaluating the NSF broader impacts with the Inclusion-Immediacy Criterion: A retrospective analysis of nanotechnology grants," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    12. Abbate, Stefano & Centobelli, Piera & Cerchione, Roberto, 2023. "The digital and sustainable transition of the agri-food sector," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    13. Paivi Abernethy & Katriina Soini & Joy Ommer & Janne Artell & Titta Tapiola & Antonio Parodi, 2025. "Reframing Citizen Participation: Turning Barriers into Guiding Enablers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-21, September.
    14. Josephine Berndt & Sandra Nitz, 2023. "Learning in Citizen Science: The Effects of Different Participation Opportunities on Students’ Knowledge and Attitudes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-16, August.
    15. Chollet, Barthélemy & Revet, Karine, 2025. "Expanding the scientist's palette: factors ofengagement with the Arts in geosciences and biology research," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    16. Cristian Alarcon Ferrari & Mari Jönsson & Solomon Gebreyohannis Gebrehiwot & Linley Chiwona-Karltun & Cecilia Mark-Herbert & Daniela Manuschevich & Neil Powell & Thao Do & Kevin Bishop & Tuija Hilding, 2021. "Citizen Science as Democratic Innovation That Renews Environmental Monitoring and Assessment for the Sustainable Development Goals in Rural Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-9, March.
    17. Klimczuk, Andrzej & Butkeviciene, Egle & Kerla, Minela, 2022. "Citizen Science and Social Innovation: Mutual Relations, Barriers, Needs, and Development Factors," EconStor Books, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, number 251554, April.
    18. Alblas, Edwin & van Zeben, Josephine, 2023. "Public participation for a greener Europe: The potential of farmers in biodiversity monitoring," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    19. Anders Brostrom & Cornelia Lawson & Mabel Sanchez Barrioluengo, 2024. "Are scientists perceived as credible experts?," MIOIR Working Paper Series 2024-04, The Manchester Institute of Innovation Research (MIoIR), The University of Manchester.
    20. Stefano Abbate & Piera Centobelli & Roberto Cerchione & Simon Peter Nadeem & Emanuela Riccio, 2024. "Sustainability trends and gaps in the textile, apparel and fashion industries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 2837-2864, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:13:y:2021:i:20:p:11406-:d:657282. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.