IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v15y2023i22p16095-d1283337.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

High-Performance Project Teams: Analysis from the Stoic Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Nelson Moreno-Monsalve

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universidad Ean, Bogotá 110221, Colombia)

  • Marcela Delgado-Ortiz

    (Faculty of Engineering, Universidad Ean, Bogotá 110221, Colombia)

  • Alfredo Sanabria-Ospino

    (Faculty of International Business, Universidad de Santo Tomas, Bucaramanga 680006, Colombia)

  • Tamara Tatiana Pardo Ezcurra

    (Department of Research, Universidad Privada Peruano Alemana, Lima 15064, Peru)

  • Yoni Wildor Nicolás Rojas

    (Department of Research, ELP Escuela Superior La Pontificia, Ayacucho 06002, Peru)

  • William Fajardo-Moreno

    (Department of Research and Transfer, Universidad Ean, Bogotá 110221, Colombia)

Abstract

Nowadays, any consideration regarding project management implies an all-encompassing approach constituted by three perspectives: organizational, human, and engineering. In this sense, it is necessary for the project manager to reflect on various issues, such as ethics, the understanding of the environment, leadership, teamwork, achieving results, change in management, the adoption of new technologies, and knowledge management, among many others, all this with the intention of ensuring success through value creation, consistent and aligned with the expectations of the different stakeholders. Because of the adoption of a comprehensive vision of project management, disciplines such as philosophy have become logical within the reasoning of organizational management. Classic postulates such as those of the Stoic school have become references for modern leader-managers because of their approach associated with personal development, self-discipline, self-control, logic, balance with the environment, and the creation of social value. The research analyzed how the postulates of the Stoic philosophy can determine the high performance of project teams. To achieve this, 70 project managers from different small and medium enterprises (SMEs) located in Bogotá, Colombia, were surveyed about the seven main thoughts of Stoicism and the possible relationship with the performance of their project teams. Based on their answers, a correlational model of structural equations was applied to obtain the conclusions of this study. The results obtained in this investigation are intended to contribute significantly to the maturity and modernization of the project management discipline.

Suggested Citation

  • Nelson Moreno-Monsalve & Marcela Delgado-Ortiz & Alfredo Sanabria-Ospino & Tamara Tatiana Pardo Ezcurra & Yoni Wildor Nicolás Rojas & William Fajardo-Moreno, 2023. "High-Performance Project Teams: Analysis from the Stoic Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-12, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:16095-:d:1283337
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/16095/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/15/22/16095/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sooyoung Choi & Alisa Kazakova & Kijung Choi & Yong-Seok Choi & Insin Kim, 2023. "Effects of Residents’ Empowerment on Citizenship Behavior and Support for Convention Development: Moderation of Innovativeness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-14, September.
    2. Sae-hoon Lee & Hyun-chul Kang & Jong-sung Kim & Woo-yeul Baek, 2023. "Effects of College Faculty Members’ Entrepreneurial Orientation on Organizational Performance: Case of South Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-12, February.
    3. Marly Monteiro de Carvalho & Roque Rabechini Junior, 2015. "Impact of risk management on project performance: the importance of soft skills," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 53(2), pages 321-340, January.
    4. Panagiotis Kafetzopoulos & Evangelos Psomas & Anastasia A. Katou, 2023. "Promoting Strategic Flexibility and Business Performance through Organizational Ambidexterity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
    5. Umar Nawaz Kayani & Anamul Haque & Umme Kulsum & Nishat Taslin Mohona & Fakhrul Hasan, 2023. "Modeling the Antecedents of Green Consumption Values to Promote the Green Attitude," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Silvia Martínez-Perales & Isabel Ortiz-Marcos & Jesús Juan Ruiz & Francisco Javier Lázaro, 2018. "Using Certification as a Tool to Develop Sustainability in Project Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Jamaliah Said & Md. Mahmudul Alam & Razana Juhaida Johari, 2020. "Assessment of risk management practices in the public sector of Malaysia," International Journal of Business and Emerging Markets, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 12(4), pages 377-390.
    3. Tor Guimaraes & Ketan Paranjape & Mike Walton, 2019. "An Expanded Model of Success Factors for NPD Performance," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(07), pages 1-29, November.
    4. Diego F. Uribe & Isabel Ortiz-Marcos & Ángel Uruburu, 2018. "What Is Going on with Stakeholder Theory in Project Management Literature? A Symbiotic Relationship for Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-23, April.
    5. Rasimikayati, Elly & Karyani, Tuti & Rachmat Saefudin, Bobby, 2023. "Characteristics of Vegetables and Fruit Firms and their Relationship with Business Risk," International Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Research, Malwa International Journals Publication, vol. 9(4), August.
    6. Xue, Jinjie & Yuan, Hongping & Shi, Benshan, 2016. "Investigating partners' opportunistic behavior in joint ventures in China: The role of transaction costs and relational exchanges," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(12), pages 6067-6078.
    7. Zuo, Fei & Zio, Enrico & Xu, Yue, 2023. "Bi-objective optimization of the scheduling of risk-related resources for risk response," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    8. Kanghee Park & Boyoung Kim, 2024. "Effects of Individual Client’s Competencies on Construction Project Performance: Mediating Participation Attitude and Partnership," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-17, February.
    9. Tor Guimaraes & Ketan Paranjape & Mike Cornick & Curtis P. Armstrong, 2018. "Empirically Testing Factors Increasing Manufacturing Product Innovation Success," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(02), pages 1-26, April.
    10. Seyed Hossein Razavi Hajiagha & Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji & Maryam Behnam & Boshra Nekoughadirli & Rohit Joshi, 2022. "A scenario-based robust time–cost tradeoff model to handle the effect of COVID-19 on supply chains project management," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 357-377, June.
    11. Miao Yu & Fangwei Zhu & Xiaotian Yang & Linzhuo Wang & Xiuxia Sun, 2018. "Integrating Sustainability into Construction Engineering Projects: Perspective of Sustainable Project Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-17, March.
    12. Saad Muslet Albogami & Mohd Khairol Anuar Bin Mohd Ariffin & Eris Elianddy Bin Supeni & Kamarul Arifin Ahmad, 2021. "A New Hybrid AHP and Dempster—Shafer Theory of Evidence Method for Project Risk Assessment Problem," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(24), pages 1-30, December.
    13. Lyu, Wenjing & Liu, Jin, 2021. "Soft skills, hard skills: What matters most? Evidence from job postings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 300(C).
    14. Bin Xue & Bingsheng Liu & Ting Sun, 2018. "What Matters in Achieving Infrastructure Sustainability through Project Management Practices: A Preliminary Study of Critical Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-20, November.
    15. Singh, Shikha & Chandra Misra, Subhas & Kumar, Sameer, 2020. "Identification and ranking of the risk factors involved in PLM implementation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    16. Marko Jakšič & Matej Marinč, 2019. "Relationship banking and information technology: the role of artificial intelligence and FinTech," Risk Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 21(1), pages 1-18, March.
    17. Sigal Kordova & Shimon Fridkin, 2021. "Risk Management for Defense SoS in a Complex, Dynamic Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    18. Mansoor Shekarian & Mahour Parast, 2021. "Do Entrepreneurship Skills Improve Project Performance? A Project-Based Learning Perspective," Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation in Emerging Economies, Entrepreneurship Development Institute of India, vol. 30(2), pages 267-305, September.
    19. Rocío Rodríguez-Rivero & Isabel Ortiz-Marcos & Luis Ballesteros-Sánchez & Xabier Martínez-Beneitez, 2020. "Identifying Risks for Better Project Management between Two Different Cultures: The Chinese and the Spanish," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-14, September.
    20. Ariadna Linda Bednarz & Marta Borkowska-Bierć & Marek Matejun, 2021. "Managerial Responses to the Onset of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Healthcare Organizations Project Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-25, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:15:y:2023:i:22:p:16095-:d:1283337. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.